search for: search2

...tep<-10^(-2) n.steps<-(end-start)/step steps2 <-n.steps^2 grids<-seq(from=start+step, to=end, by=step) xMax <-matrix(0,N*steps2,3) xMax[,1]<-rep(x[,1],steps2) xMax[,2]<-rep(x[,2],steps2) xMax[,3]<-rep(x[,3],steps2) G.search1<-as.matrix(rep(grids, n.steps, each=N)) G.search2<-as.matrix(rep(grids, N, each=n.steps)) G.search<-cbind(1,G.search1, G.search2) Thank you Dimitris -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/memory-problem-Error-cannot-allocate-vector-of-size-915-5-Mb-tp3707943p3707943.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive...

...authentication build in, meaning that if the user enabled it, we will query about his basic data (email,pwd) on a user-setup LDAP directory. It used to work fine when I was testing with OpenLDAP. The code, essentially, is this: connection.bind(self.bind_dn,self.password) connection.search2(self.base_dn,1,"(& (userPassword=#{password}) (mail=#{email}))",nil,false,5,5000) It binds and then searches for the user by mail and password. The entries must have a userPassword and mail attributes. It''s part of the core schema (I guess), so it works fine on OpenLDAP. I...

...r-slave switch in this case is non-trivial task, that may have result in whole dataset inconsistency. Do you have any experience in such cases ? Maby load-balance in HAProxy colud do the thing ? Something like: ......... server search1 192.168.1.1:8983 check port 8983 inter 20s fastinter 2 server search2 192.168.1.2:8983 backup ......... Best Regards

Obviously I am missing something and I don''t know what it is... I am following the instructions at http://rubyforge.org/docman/view.php/381/114/activeldap_rb.html and also here... http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/HowtoAuthenticateViaLdap my model looks exactly like this... class LdapUser < ActiveRecord::Base ldap_mapping :dnattr => ''uid'', :prefix

...playing items. When it comes to using Ruby-ldap though, it is quite a different matter. We''ve tried using Ruby-ldap within irb, and all seems well. The basic scenario is: conn = LDAP::Conn.new(''server_name'', 389) conn.bind(account_here, password_here) my_results = conn.search2(''base_here'', LDAP::LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE, filter_here, attrs=nil) When the third line is executed we get (again, all works fine in irb): WEBrick server error: Assertion failed: LDAP_VALID( ld ), file error.c, line 257 [2006-04-20 14:38:15] INFO WEBrick 1.3.1 [2006-04-20 14:38:15...

...ontrived example in the Appendix which demonstrates the code generated for both approaches. The key differences are highlighted inline. Evaluation In this section, we present an in-depth evaluation of the impact on clang bootstrap and summary results for two google internal workloads, Search1 and Search2 as well overall results on the SPECInt 2017 benchmarks. All experiments are conducted on Intel Skylake based systems unless otherwise noted. Profile guided optimizations using instrumented profiles are enabled for all builds. clang-bootstrap We pick 500 compiler invocations from a bootstrap build...

...ontrived example in the Appendix which demonstrates the code generated for both approaches. The key differences are highlighted inline. Evaluation In this section, we present an in-depth evaluation of the impact on clang bootstrap and summary results for two google internal workloads, Search1 and Search2 as well overall results on the SPECInt 2017 benchmarks. All experiments are conducted on Intel Skylake based systems unless otherwise noted. Profile guided optimizations using instrumented profiles are enabled for all builds. clang-bootstrap We pick 500 compiler invocations from a bootstrap buil...

...generated for both approaches. The key differences are highlighted >> inline. >> >> Evaluation >> >> In this section, we present an in-depth evaluation of the impact on clang >> bootstrap and summary results for two google internal workloads, Search1 >> and Search2 as well overall results on the SPECInt 2017 benchmarks. All >> experiments are conducted on Intel Skylake based systems unless otherwise >> noted. Profile guided optimizations using instrumented profiles are enabled >> for all builds. >> >> clang-bootstrap >> &gt...

..., we originally reported ~35G. That is *wrong* since the clang binary used to measure bolt overheads was built with basic block labels. Our *sincere apologies* for this, this showed BOLT as consuming more memory than is actual for clang. We double-checked BOLT numbers with the internal benchmark search2 for sanity and that is built *without any labels* and only with "-Wl,-q". We are checking the other large internal benchmarks too. We cannot disclose internal benchmarks. So, we will get more large open-source benchmarks like Chrome or gcc built with bolt and share the binaries and resu...

Finally I kind of modified llvm to generate assembly that can run on AMDGPU pro drivers. One problem is the performance of the code generated by llvm is about 10% slower than amdgpu's online compiler. Anything I can tune the performance up the performance of llvm?\ Thanks! On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM 董昌道 <dongchangdao at gmail.com> wrote: > I am writing a miner of crypto

...rted ~35G. > That is *wrong* since the clang binary used to measure bolt overheads was > built with basic block labels. Our *sincere apologies* for this, this > showed BOLT as consuming more memory than is actual for clang. We > double-checked BOLT numbers with the internal benchmark search2 for sanity > and that is built *without any labels* and only with "-Wl,-q". We are > checking the other large internal benchmarks too. We cannot disclose > internal benchmarks. So, we will get more large open-source benchmarks like > Chrome or gcc built with bolt and share t...

...rted ~35G. > That is *wrong* since the clang binary used to measure bolt overheads was > built with basic block labels. Our *sincere apologies* for this, this > showed BOLT as consuming more memory than is actual for clang. We > double-checked BOLT numbers with the internal benchmark search2 for sanity > and that is built *without any labels* and only with "-Wl,-q". We are > checking the other large internal benchmarks too. We cannot disclose > internal benchmarks. So, we will get more large open-source benchmarks like > Chrome or gcc built with bolt and share t...

Hello, I wanted to consolidate all the discussions and our final thoughts on the concerns raised. I have attached a document consolidating it. BOLT’s performance gains inspired this work and we believe BOLT is a great piece of engineering. However, there are build environments where scalability is critical and memory limits per process are tight : * Debug Fission,