search for: sealing

Dear All, It may be this not the correct mailing list, but I''m having a ZFS issue when a disk is failing. The system is a supermicro motherboard X8DTH-6F in a 4U chassis (SC847E1-R1400LPB) and an external SAS2 JBOD (SC847E16-RJBOD1). It makes a system with a total of 4 backplanes (2x SAS + 2x SAS2) each of them connected to a 4 different HBA (2x LSI 3081E-R (1068 chip) + 2x LSI

...set) *NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - using NTLM1* [2023/07/06 11:14:15.786392, 3, pid=2118992, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/libsmb/cliconnect.c:1678(cli_session_setup_creds_done_spnego) SPNEGO login failed: The request is not supported. What would cause the client to use NTLM1 for signing and sealing? Is this due to the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL flag not being set? Is this even an issue? I presume it may be problematic, due to the subsequent "SPNEGO login failed" message. Thank you, Vincent

Hi, I have a test AD running Samba on Ubuntu that I sometimes poke with Sysinternal's ADExplorer. A few days ago I tried connecting to it, but got a short reply of "The directory service is not available." As it was working earlier, I tried finding the problem. After installing a few older releases, I found that it was working on Ubuntu 17.04, Samba 4.5.8 and stopped working on

Hi, I encounter a problem with method dispatch with S4 classes, using the 'sealed' parameter in setClass. See that example below: setClass("X",representation(x="numeric"),sealed=TRUE) setGeneric("foo",function(x) standardGeneric("foo")) setMethod("foo",signature("X"),function(x) print("foo(X)")) x <-

Dear All, Recently I notice that sometime the AD DC will die sometime. Any one have see this issue before? And yesterday case lead me to believes that this error message was the issue... They are repetitive and thus I only show 2... [2015/07/29 00:00:04.620033, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for

On 3/27/2018 6:37 AM, Erdei Miklos via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I have a test AD running Samba on Ubuntu that I sometimes poke with Sysinternal's ADExplorer. > A few days ago I tried connecting to it, but got a short reply of "The directory service is not available." > As it was working earlier, I tried finding the problem. > After installing a few older releases, I

IMHO, in short, learn to use encrypted connections. 2016-07-27 22:38 GMT+02:00 Kris Lou <klou at themusiclink.net>: > As of 4.2.11: https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2112.html > > =================== > New smb.conf option > =================== > > ldap server require strong auth (G) > > The ldap server require strong auth defines whether the

What Samba version are you using? I have seen a similar problem triggered by connectivity issues between the DCs. What's the output from samba-tool drs showrepl? Still, I haven't found a solution... On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Just to ask. > Anyone can shard some light on that wrong is that? > > Thank you. > > Min

Hi the list When two setGeneric occurs on the same function, the second erage the first and erase all the function previously define. Is it possible to prevent that ? Is it possible to declare a setGeneric that can not be erased later ? Something like the |sealed for setMethod...| || |Thanks| || Christophe

Dear list, this is not a problem report -- I would like to ask for advise what the recommended and safe way to perform the following is or what problems might arise in doing it differently. The question is: What is the recommended way of providing a default value in a prototype statement for a derived class for a slot provided from a parent class? I have first consulted the methods package

Hi, On 3/27/2018 6:37 AM, Erdei Miklos via samba wrote: &gt; Hi, &gt; &gt; I have a test AD running Samba on Ubuntu that I sometimes poke with Sysinternal's ADExplorer. &gt; A few days ago I tried connecting to it, but got a short reply of "The directory service is not available." &gt; As it was working earlier, I tried finding the problem. &gt; After

Hi everyone, I have installed a Samba AD DC version 4.2.11-20 in a Centos 6.7 machine and joined it in an existing domain. Everything seems working fine except I can't bind to it using LDAP simple authentication. When I try to perform a simple ldapsearch I get the following response: ldap_bind: Strong(er) authentication required (8) additional info: BindSimple: Transport encryption required.

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > There's some way to ''tight'' that configuration , eg permit 'ldap server require strong auth = > > no' only by some hosts? > > Or some other smb.conf options that i've missed? > Nothing at this stage. Ok. > The issue is that they need to do fully signed or sealed Kerberos

I had 444 errors I didn't want to put them all up here. Maybe I missed a step, maybe it's an easy "oops you forgot to do this" I'm on ubuntu 10.10 amd64 server completely uptodate today. I followed the http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO My git is also today. == samba4.rpc.echo on ncacn_ip_tcp with validate and --option=socket:testnonblock=True

Just to ask. Anyone can shard some light on that wrong is that? Thank you. Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> 於 2015年7月30日 星期四寫道： > Dear All, > > Recently I notice that sometime the AD DC will die sometime. > Any one have see this issue before? > > And yesterday case lead me to believes that this error message was the > issue... > They are repetitive and thus I

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:19:34 +0000 Brian Candler via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 21/11/2016 17:21, Brian Candler wrote: > > I'd quite like to be able to fetch a ticket using the keytab > > I found a solution to that part by using a different form of > principal name with "hostname$" > > root at client-ad:~# kinit -k -t

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

I have a couple of Debian 8.5 systems set up in similar manner. Samba is version 4.2.10-Debian Here is the essential config... # testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section "[homes]" Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global]

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do

Hallo When rejoining a dc to the domain I get the following error message: [2015/07/02 11:51:44.089786, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:729(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for