Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "se'rver".
Did you mean:
5server
2016 Apr 04
2
DNS issues after FSMO seize
SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone".
Using Bind-DLZ all DNS servers can modify the AD zones, they all reply "I
am the SOA" when you ask them about SOA for AD zones.
Using Internal DNS I expect all DNS servers can modify the AD zones also
(that's internal stuff) but even if they can mod...
2016 Apr 04
0
DNS issues after FSMO seize
On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote:
> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone".
No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to
contact for the domain records.
> Using Bind-DLZ all DNS servers can modify the AD zones, they all reply "I
> am the SOA" when you ask them about SOA for AD zones...
2016 Apr 05
5
DNS issues after FSMO seize
2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>:
> On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote:
>
>> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone".
>>
>
> No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to
> contact for the domain records.
>
Rowland... thank you again Captain Obvious. Yes SOA means Start Of
Authority, but I took time explain to clarify things...
2016 Mar 31
3
DNS issues after FSMO seize
...problems... Welcome to the continuing saga of FILER.
It appears that neither SOA or NS records were updated during the process
of moving fsmo roles to CBADC01. SOA entries on all three active DCs point
to FILER. There aren't any NS records for any of the new DCs, only FILER.
In RSAT each DNS server's properties show filer.cb.cliffbells.com is the
primary server. This looks at awful lot like this to me:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-October/195352.html
This process is killing me.
I assume this misconfiguration is in large part responsible for
authentication and share a...
2016 Apr 05
0
DNS issues after FSMO seize
On 05/04/16 09:33, mathias dufresne wrote:
>
>
> 2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org
> <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>>:
>
> On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote:
>
> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone".
>
>
> No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who
> to contact for the domain records.
>
>
> Rowland... thank you again Captain Obvious. Yes SOA means Start Of
> Authority, but I took time explai...
2016 Apr 05
0
DNS issues after FSMO seize
>> There is no link between SOA and NS except they share the zone....
Really... ? i dont agree..
SOA specifies the DNS server providing authoritative information about a domain, so looks to me its direcly related to NameServers.
SOA contains the primary (NS) server of the domain.
Looks to me its related...
Below it nice explained how DNS works.
That a SOA not (always) related is to a NS records, that i agree....
2016 Apr 05
3
DNS issues after FSMO seize
For me:
- SOA means where updates can be sent.
- SOA can be one or several.
- NS is a record to help non-authoritative name servers to find a valid
name server for the zone they receive a request and they don't know
anything about that zone.
- SOA is often declared as NS, I agree. I explained this is not mandatory.
There is no link betw...