Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "sdxdebug".
Did you mean:
ddebug
2010 Mar 01
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debug
...se in issue in SelectionDAG in our sources and
also in the Blackfin codegen on TOT.
Please review, comment and let me know what needs to change for
commit.
Thanks!
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sdxdebug.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7881 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100301/b83b5e81/attachment.bin>
2010 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Debug SelectionDAG & SDUse
...having XDEBUG-style checks
on SelectionDAG is extremely valuable. I've been working this bug for two
weeks and only nailed it down with this patch.
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sdxdebug.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7706 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100225/630d18b2/attachment.bin>
2010 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] Massive Number of Test Failures
On Thursday 25 February 2010 20:20:56 Dan Gohman wrote:
Wrong thread?
> SDUse::setInitial should initialize List to null in your patch. You're
> probably seeing random uninitialized data noise without that.
> (Though valgrind wouldn't notice this because of the aggressive reuse
> of allocated memory.)
Why isn't the default constructor called? I would have expected that
2010 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] Massive Number of Test Failures
...d patch. It shows the same iterator errors I'm seeing
with 2.5. Run make-check with a Debug+Checks compiler. I
will file a bug once I have a proper internet connection. :-/
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sdxdebug.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7858 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100225/6d9e89ad/attachment.bin>
2010 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debug
...t; I've used this to diagnose in issue in SelectionDAG in our sources and
> also in the Blackfin codegen on TOT.
>
> Please review, comment and let me know what needs to change for
> commit.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Dave
>
> <sdxdebug.patch>_______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2010 Feb 26
4
[LLVMdev] Massive Number of Test Failures
On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:24 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Thursday 25 February 2010 16:17:10 David Greene wrote:
>> On Thursday 25 February 2010 16:07:59 Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:01 PM, David Greene wrote:
>>>> I am seeing a whole lot of failures in the tests on trunk. From
>>>> discussions with Chris and others, I should not be seeing