search for: sdp_session

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sdp_session".

Did you mean: sbp_session
2020 May 30
1
PJSIP
...t0o-0u03@ infront of the ip address. ? Another question... how to set a=rtcp-fb Does asterisk support this ? Any help is much appreciated. PJSIP config. [test01] type=aor contact=sip:34.221.174.202:15033 [test01] type = endpoint transport=transport-tls ice_support = yes allow=!all,ulaw,h264 sdp_session=xaccel rtcp_mux=yes aors=test01 media_encryption=sdes from_user=109643183 from_domain=xaccel.net outbound_proxy=sip:34.221.174.202:15033 direct_media=no direct_media_method=invite dtmf_mode=rfc4733 use_avpf=yes John Bittner CTO [xaccellogoemail] 380 US Highway 46, Suite 500 Totowa, NJ 07512 Phone:...
2016 Jul 01
2
CALLERID on pjsip doesn't work?
Asterisk 13.8 Is CALLERID(all) supposed to wok for pjsip? When I do this: exten => 1234,Set(CALLERID(all)="Jon Doe" <+123456789>) same => n,Dial(PJSIP/phone123, 30) I expect the callerid to be as set, but is always seems to be "phone123", the name of the endpoint. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2016 Jul 04
2
CALLERID on pjsip doesn't work?
...th md5_cred= realm= auth_type=userpass password=4D7D9A7F1822 nonce_lifetime=32 username=507B495E565B [DEADDEADBEEF] type=endpoint timers_sess_expires=1800 device_state_busy_at=0 dtls_cipher= from_domain= dtls_rekey=0 dtls_fingerprint=SHA-256 direct_media_method=invite send_rpid=false pickup_group= sdp_session=Asterisk dtls_verify=No message_context= mailboxes= named_pickup_group= record_on_feature=automixmon dtls_private_key= named_call_group= t38_udptl_maxdatagram=0 media_encryption_optimistic=false aors=DEADDEADBEEF rpid_immediate=false outbound_proxy= identify_by=username inband_progress=false rtp_sy...
2017 Jun 05
3
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: >>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two ends >>> points on public networks and visible to one another? If not the reinvite >>> may be passing an internal (nat'ed)