search for: sdk1

Hallo, linux-btrfs, I''ve (once again) tried "add" and "delete". First, with 3 devices (partitions): mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdl1 /dev/sdm1 Mounted (to /mnt/btr), filled with about 100 GByte data. Then btrfs device add /dev/sdj1 /mnt/btr results in # show Label: none uuid: 6bd7d4df-e133-47d1-9b19-3c7565428770 Total devices 4 FS bytes used 100.44GB devid 3 size 68.37GB used 44.95GB path /dev/sdm1 devid...

Hi, I rebooted some CEPH servers with 24 HDs and do get some messages for some of the disks: [ 519.667055] XFS (sdk1): Mounting V4 Filesystem [ 519.692307] XFS (sdk1): Ending clean mount [ 519.781975] attempt to access beyond end of device [ 519.781984] sdk1: rw=0, want=1560774288, limit=1560774287 All disks are xfs formated and currently I don't see any problem on the CEPH side. But I have a bad feeling...

Hello I have a CentOS 6.6 Server with 13 disks in a RAID 6. Some weeks ago, i upgraded it to 17 disks, two of them configured as spare. The reshape worked like normal in the beginning. But at 69% it stopped. md2 : active raid6 sdj1[0] sdg1[18](S) sdh1[2] sdi1[5] sdm1[15] sds1[12] sdr1[14] sdk1[9] sdo1[6] sdn1[13] sdl1[8] sdd1[20] sdf1[19] sdq1[16] sdb1[10] sde1[17](S) sdc1[21] 19533803520 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 1024k chunk, algorithm 2 [15/15] [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] [=============>.......] reshape = 69.0% (1347861324/1953380352) finish=46103134.8min speed=0K/sec I already...

...t End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 243201 1953512001 83 Linux .... I go about creating the array as follows # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md3 --level=6 --raid-devices=10 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdi1 /dev/sdj1 /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdl1 mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric mdadm: chunk size defaults to 64K mdadm: size set to 1953511936K Continue creating array? As you can see mdadm sets the size to 1.9T. Looking around there was this limitation on older versions of mdadm if they are the 32 bit version. I am using t...

I used this command to create volume label on OCFS: mkfs.ocfs -F -b 128 -L data13 -m /oradata/data13 -u oracle -g dba -p 0775 /dev/emcpowerp1 emcpowerp is composed of /dev/sdad and /dev/sdk. It seems the above command created the same labels for /dev/emcpowerp1, /dev/sdad1 and /dev/sdk1. But when I tried to mount this ocfs filesystem by label, it gave me the following error. # mount -L data13 /oradata/data13 mount: the label data13 occurs on both /dev/emcpowerp1 and /dev/sdad1 - not mounted Is this a bug? Or does it mean OCFS label would not work for EMC PowerPath devices? Than...

...ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdd1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sde1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdf1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdg1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdh1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdi1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdj1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdk1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdl1 ocfs2 ppsdb102, ppsdb101 /dev/sdm1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdn1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdo1 ocfs2 ppsdb102 /dev/sdp1 ocfs2 ppsdb102, ppsdb101 /dev/sdq1 ocfs2 ppsdb102, ppsdb101 /dev/sdr1...

...o2cb A183305755964CF7B8D1A7307FAA0171 cluster /dev/sdg1 ocfs2 o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/sdh1 ocfs2 o2cb 3A88FC23DBC34233BB175B056BC744A1 cluster /dev/sdi1 ocfs2 o2cb A183305755964CF7B8D1A7307FAA0171 cluster /dev/sdj1 ocfs2 o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/sdk1 ocfs2 o2cb 3A88FC23DBC34233BB175B056BC744A1 cluster /dev/sdl1 ocfs2 o2cb A183305755964CF7B8D1A7307FAA0171 cluster /dev/sdm1 ocfs2 o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/mapper/san_lun2p1 ocfs2 o2cb F5E5D05E10D5416690D8EBA6A6C56D64 cluster /dev/mapper/san_lun1p1 ocfs2 o2cb A183305755964C...

Are there instructions on how to take the actual ISO install image (not a live image), put that iso file on a USB thumbdrive and install from that instead of DVD? I would be interested in putting a kickstart file on the USB also. so just plug in a USB and everything installs just the way I want/need. Thanks, Jerry

...v/sda2 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [39.88 GB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdg1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdh1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdi1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdj1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdk1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.47 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdl1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.47 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdm1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdn1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdo1 VG bak-rdc lvm2 [1.95 TB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdp1 VG...

...th?) of the md devices is generating these errors. system is running centos 5.3 64bit: # uname -a Linux xenmaster.dimension-x.local 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 09:53:14 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md1 : active raid5 sdk1[2] sdj1[4] sdi1[3] sdh1[0] sdg1[1] 976783616 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU] md0 : active raid5 sdf1[3] sde1[1] sdd1[4](S) sdc1[0] sdb1[2] 2197715712 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] unused devices: <none> here is what dmesg has to say: (...

Hi all, Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it? usb-storage: device found at 5 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning Vendor: Model: Rev: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic

My CentOS 5.4 box has a single HBA card with 2 ports connected to my Storage. 2 Luns are assigned to my HBA card. Under /dev instead of seeing 4 devices I can see 12 devices from sdb to sdm. I am using qlogic driver that is bulitin to the OS. Has any one seen this kind of situation? Paras -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Gluster-user folks, I'm trying to use gluster in a way that may be a considered an unusual use case for gluster. Feel free to let me know if you think what I'm doing is dumb. It just feels very comfortable doing this with gluster. I have been using gluster in other, more orthodox configurations, for several years. I have a single system with 45 inexpensive sata drives - it's a

.../dev/sdh1 raid-disk 5 device /dev/sdi1 raid-disk 6 device /dev/sdj1 raid-disk 7 device /dev/sdk1 raid-disk 8 device /dev/sdl1 raid-disk 9 device /dev/sdm1 raid-disk 10 device /dev/sdn1 raid-disk...

Hallo, "never change a running system" ... For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without problems. Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems. Copying something into the btrfs "directory" worked well for some files, and then I got error messages (I''ve not