search for: sdfs

...tored. The registered office of Shop Direct Limited is First Floor, Skyways House, Speke Road, Speke, Liverpool, L70 1AB, registered number 04730752. Subsidiary companies of Shop Direct Limited include: Shop Direct Group Financial Services Limited (SDGFS), Shop Direct Financial Services Limited (SDFS) and Shop Direct Finance Company Limited (SDFC). The registered office of SDGFS, SDFS and SDFC is Aintree Innovation Centre, Park Lane, Netherton, Bootle, L30 1SL, registered numbers 05200103 (SDGFS), 04730706 (SDFS) and 04660974 (SDFC). SDFS and SDFC are authorised and regulated by the Financial S...

Hi list, is there any working solution for deduplication of data for centos? We are trying to find a solution for our backup server which runs a bash script invoking xdelta(3). But having this functionality in fs is much more friendly... We have looked into lessfs, sdfs and ddar. Are these filesystems ready to use (on centos)? ddar is sthg different, I know. Thx Rainer

.... Please note that email communications may be monitored. The registered office of Shop Direct Limited is 1st Floor, Skyways House, Speke Road, Speke, Liverpool, L70 1AB, registered number 04730752. Subsidiary companies within Shop Direct Limited include: Shop Direct Financial Services Limited (SDFS), Shop Direct Group Financial Services Limited (SDGFS) and Littlewoods Finance Company Limited (LFCo). The registered office of SDFS, SDGFS and LFCo is Aintree Innovation Centre, Park Lane, Netherton, Bootle, L30 1SL, registered numbers 04730706 (SDFS), 5200103 (SDGFS) and 04660974 (LFCo). SDFS and...

Hi people. I have some issues, I setup a samba server(3.0.28) with gentoo, samba + ldap. Is working, I can create users, change, add, mod, etc,etc. I setup each home drive, using smbldap-tools. Everything is working good. But I have 1 problem, I want to setup my windows xp pro sp2 users to have roaming + folder redirection to my samba server. Some folders are very easy to move to be in

...;a target='_blank' href='mailto:test at vinotekaolvi.cz'></a>): Error: Internal quota calculation error<br>Jan 10 20:44:14 lda(test at test.cz): Info: msgid=<<a target='_blank' href='mailto:1Qg.7WxZ.46PKIvcQWgrs.1Iq4r%7B at seznam.cz'>1Qg.7WxZ.sdfs.<wbr>1Iq4r{@seznam.cz</a>>: save failed to INBOX: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2014-01-10 20:44:14]</code> <code>$ cat /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf | grep -v "^ *#" | grep -v "^ *$"<br>protocols = pop3 imap...

Hey folks, I have a 14TB disk array that I want to use for rsnapshot backups, and am considering putting a dedup FS onto it. I know I've got about a TB of duplication, at least. And it is not easy to remove manually. Google lands me LessFS and SDFS as the prime candidates. thanks, -Alan -- ?Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV? ? ? ? ?? - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"

I have centos 5.7 (server). I need to configure it for backup system, that means it have to back up or back up documents shall be posted or send to this server from various users (clients using windows machine and ubuntu). Can someone help me with instructions on how i can make this possible? And /or is it possible to set active directory on this machine and if possible how? Please help, i am not

...? ? ? ? ? >> delay-gen.delay-duration ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?100000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> delay-gen.enable ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> disperse.parallel-writes ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> features.sdfs ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> features.cloudsync ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> features.utime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> ctime.noatime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on...

...? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > delay-gen.delay-duration ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?100000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > delay-gen.enable ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > disperse.parallel-writes ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > features.sdfs ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > features.cloudsync ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > features.utime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ctime.noatime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ?...

Hi David, On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > In testing we found that actually the GFS client having access to all 3 nodes made no difference to performance. Perhaps that's because the 3rd node that wasn't accessible from the client before was the arbiter node? It makes sense, as no data is being generated towards