Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "sdcc".
Did you mean:
scc
2013 May 11
0
[LLVMdev] Fw: Accepting iCode as input to SDCC
FYI for people who may be interested in using LLVM with 8-bit CPUs.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 15:29:12 +0300
From: Paul Sokolovsky
To: sdcc-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Accepting iCode as input to SDCC
Hello,
I'm interested to make SDCC accept iCode (its own intermediate
representation) as an input format. The motivation being taking
intermediate format from other compilers' frontends, which support more
languages...
2009 Jan 29
1
Problem compiling 3.3.0?
...ntree Innovation Centre, Park Lane, Netherton, Bootle, L30 1SL, registered numbers 05200103 (SDGFS), 04730706 (SDFS) and 04660974 (SDFC). SDFS and SDFC are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority in respect of arranging insurance products.
Shop Direct Contact Centres Limited (SDCC) and Shop Direct Home Shopping Limited (SDHS). The registered office of SDCC and SDHS is First Floor, Skyways House, Speke Road, Speke, Liverpool, L70 1AB, registered numbers 05330323 (SDCC), 04663281 (SDHS).
All companies registered in England.
**************************************************...
2016 Oct 04
2
LLVM z80 backend and llvm-dis missing?
Inspired by Jason Turner's talk at CppCon 2016: Jason Turner “Rich Code
for Tiny Computers: A Simple Commodore 64 Game in C++17”
I got interested in writing a Zilog Z80 backend for LLVM. Jason actually
did no such thing, but instead wrote a x86-to-6502 translator (reassembler
he calls it) https://github.com/lefticus/x86-to-6502
So I'm now trying to bootstrap this project.
Goal:
- be
2006 Nov 23
3
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
...table code though.
>
> It generates C99. Its portability is no better or worse than any other
> backend.
Does that mean that I will have to configure llvm as a cross-compiler
even when using the C backend?
I want to use LLVM to translate C++ into C and compile the resulting C
code using sdcc.
I already noticed some problems (resulting C code uses different data
types than input).
Philipp
2008 Aug 13
1
Samba 3.0.28a integration with 2003 AD and password lockout policy?
...Innovation Centre, Park Lane, Netherton, Bootle, L30 1SL, registered numbers 04730706 (SDFS), 5200103 (SDGFS) and 04660974 (LFCo). SDFS and LFCo are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority in respect of insurance mediation activities only.
Shop Direct Contact Centres Limited (SDCC) and Shop Direct Home Shopping Limited (SDHS). The registered office of SDCC and SDHS is 1st Floor, Skyways House, Speke Road, Speke, Liverpool, L70 1AB, registered numbers 05330323 (SDCC), 04663281 (SDHS).
All companies registered in England.
**************************************************...
2006 Nov 23
1
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
Hello Philipp,
> Does that mean that I will have to configure llvm as a cross-compiler
> even when using the C backend?
Not llvm, but llvm-gcc only. I've successfully used llvm-gcc for
crosscompiling with host=linux and target=mingw32 platform.
So, you have just to supply host, build and target triples to llvm-gcc
configure and be also sure, that configure will find target headers,
2006 Nov 24
1
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
...them to be built you should, probably you should
consult gcc documentation to find right options or change build scripts.
> Can't I just Compile my C++ code to C code (maybe using a template-only
> libstdc++, so I won't have to link it) and then compile the resulting C
> code with sdcc and link it to C libraries compiled directly with sdcc.
Surely you can as soon as you have working llvm-gcc4.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2007 May 16
2
[LLVMdev] Back End for a stack based architecture
Hi all,
I was asked to write a C compiler back end for a dated stack based
architecture, i.e. once whose instructions operate only on the top
elements of a stack and doesn't use arguments, something like the JVM.
I looked at some open source compilers (gcc, sdcc, tinyc and LLVM). To
me LLVM seems promising (and I likes C++).
Because I'm new here I need your help to understand if:
1) LLVM could be used to target stack based architecture
2) is possible but LLVM is not the best solution for that kind of
architecture (in this case any hint for the rigth...
2006 Nov 07
1
[LLVMdev] How do I use this to optimize C or C++ code?
I tried
llvm-gcc -c test.c
llvm-gcc test.o
llc -march=c test.bc -f -o test2.c
Then I compiled both test.c and test2.c with sdcc, a compiler which
lacks high-level optimization. The code generated from test2.c was
bigger. Then I tried
llvm-gcc -O5 -Os -c test.c
llvm-gcc -O5 -Os test.o
llc -march=c test.bc -f -o test2.c
But it generated exactly the same code as the commands above.
What is it that I'm doing wrong? I expe...
2006 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
...er. Then it will
generate the correct LLVM input for that platform (and consequently LLVM
will generate code for that platform) regardless of the platform on
which either LLVM or your front end are running.
> I want to use LLVM to translate C++ into C and compile the resulting C
> code using sdcc.
I'm not familiar with that compiler, but it should be fine as long as it
can handle C99. Simply target llvm-gcc for platform you want to compile
for and the resulting code should be suitable for compilation by sdcc on
that platform.
> I already noticed some problems (resulting C code uses...
2008 Aug 13
4
Cannot Redirect some windows xp folders to samba share?
Hi people.
I have some issues, I setup a samba server(3.0.28) with gentoo,
samba + ldap. Is working, I can create users, change, add, mod,
etc,etc.
I setup each home drive, using smbldap-tools. Everything is working good.
But I have 1 problem, I want to setup my windows xp pro sp2 users
to have roaming + folder redirection to my samba server. Some folders
are very easy to move to be in
2019 Dec 05
2
Dovecot & OAuth
...tion destroy
----------------------------------------------------
*#dovecot -n *
----------------------------------------------------
# 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Server release 7.7 (Maipo)
# Hostname: mktst4.sdcc.bnl.gov
auth_debug = yes
auth_debug_passwords = yes
auth_mechanisms = oauthbearer xoauth2
auth_verbose = yes
auth_verbose_passwords = yes
first_valid_uid = 1000
mail_debug = yes
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir
mbox_write_locks = fcntl
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Drafts...
2019 Dec 05
0
Dovecot & OAuth
...--------------------------------------
>
> #dovecot -n
> ----------------------------------------------------
> # 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> # OS: Linux 3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo)
> # Hostname: mktst4.sdcc.bnl.gov (http://mktst4.sdcc.bnl.gov)
> auth_debug = yes
> auth_debug_passwords = yes
> auth_mechanisms = oauthbearer xoauth2
> auth_verbose = yes
> auth_verbose_passwords = yes
> first_valid_uid = 1000
> mail_debug = yes
> mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir
> mbox_write_lo...
2008 Sep 29
3
LVM related bug in the GPL PV drivers for Windows?
...eChannel paths to a
volume on a Sun Storagetek 6140 storage:
carrier3:~ # multipathd -k
multipathd> show topology
...
...
...
vw-storman2 (3600a0b80004807f80000091248da00ef) dm-0 SUN ,CSM200_R
[size=20G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=6][active]
\_ 3:0:1:19 sdcc 69:0 [active][ready]
\_ 1:0:0:19 sdag 66:0 [active][ready]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=0][enabled]
\_ 1:0:1:19 sdbi 67:192 [active][ghost]
\_ 3:0:0:19 sdbh 67:176 [active][ghost]
...
...
...
multipathd>
A Linux fdisk command in the dom0 has the following view of the volume:
carrier3:~ # fdisk...
2012 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
On 27.08.2012 22:56, Roel Jordans wrote:
>
> Anyway, that brings to my final question: Which features are
> critical/important/wanted/unwanted for a C back-end?
>
I'd like it to be easy to configure (e.g. to tell which size int is
assumed to have).
I'd prefer the resulting code to not rely on implementation-defined
behaviour (e.g. not make any assumptions about the size of
2006 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
Pertti Kellomäki schrieb:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> Many aspects of the target compiler can leak through.
>
> So if one wants to use the LLVM system as a cross compiler, one
> has to configure llvm-gcc as a cross compiler? Fair enough, I guess.
I hope the C backend is still meant to generate portable code though.
Philipp
2006 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:10 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> Pertti Kellomäki schrieb:
> > Chris Lattner wrote:
> >> Many aspects of the target compiler can leak through.
> >
> > So if one wants to use the LLVM system as a cross compiler, one
> > has to configure llvm-gcc as a cross compiler? Fair enough, I guess.
>
> I hope the C backend is still
2004 Jun 30
8
Special Delivery from China
I received a sample IP/Speakerphone from my friends in China today.
Asterisk setup was fairly uncomplicated and I had it running as an
extension on my server within a few minutes. Sounds quality of both the
receiver and the speakerphone are fine (wife's opinion). Are there any
tests I should run with this phone?
Following are the specs:
- Single line appearance
- Alpha display, 2x16 chars
-
2019 Dec 06
4
Dovecot & OAuth
...----
> >
> > #dovecot -n
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > # 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> > # OS: Linux 3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux
> Server release 7.7 (Maipo)
> > # Hostname: mktst4.sdcc.bnl.gov (http://mktst4.sdcc.bnl.gov)
> > auth_debug = yes
> > auth_debug_passwords = yes
> > auth_mechanisms = oauthbearer xoauth2
> > auth_verbose = yes
> > auth_verbose_passwords = yes
> > first_valid_uid = 1000
> > mail_debug = yes
> > mail_locatio...
2012 Aug 27
9
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
Hello all,
I am in need for a working C back-end for LLVM for my current research.
I know that the previous incarnation of this back-end has been kicked
out of the tree since the 3.1 release and I have gone through the
archives to restore it to it's previous 'glory'.
So far, I have restored most of the previous version (excluding some of
the parts that needed changes outside of