search for: sdb6

...o the disk, but usually it gets disconnected (usb cable pulled out) buy my 8 months old daughter. Here''s the output from dmesg: [ 299.699543] parent transid verify failed on 528952573952 wanted 22726 found 22728 [ 299.700947] btrfs read error corrected: ino 1 off 528952573952 (dev /dev/sdb6 sector 585319392) [ 299.701224] btrfs: open_ctree failed I then run "btrfsck /dev/sdb6" with not much more success at all. The output is as follows: Ignoring transid failure leaf parent key incorrect 528969142272 parent transid verify failed on 528969142272 wanted 22728 found 227...

...Layout : near=2, far=1 Chunk Size : 64K UUID : 1403e5aa:3152b3f8:086582aa:c95c4fc7 Events : 0.38695092 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 6 0 active sync /dev/sda6 1 8 22 1 active sync /dev/sdb6 2 8 54 2 active sync /dev/sdd6 3 8 38 3 active sync /dev/sdc6 As far as I know raid10 is ~ "a raid0 built on top of two raid1" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels#RAID_1.2B0 - raid10). So I think that by defa...

...2nd HDD again in the 2nd Server i don't know what went wrong. Here's my dmesg in my 1st server specific in md: md: raid0 personality registered as nr 2 md: raid1 personality registered as nr 3 md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: autorun ... md: considering sdb7 ... md: adding sdb7 ... md: sdb6 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb5 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb3 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb2 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sdb1 has different UUID to sdb7 md: adding sda7 ... md: sda6 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda5 has different UUID to sdb7 md: sda3 has different UUID to sdb7...

Am I right in thinking that the numbering of the versions are in synch with the gcc version that one is recommened to build with? In other words "use gcc version 3.foo". -- John Maclean - 07739 171 531 MSc (DIC) _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...prove performance for RAID 5 volumes, especially when the log file is on a separate mirrored volume. I have also read that using data=journal can further improve performance for applications such as NFS. For these tests I created a 256MB partition in the mirrored disk set for the log device: /dev/sdb6. The RAID5 volume is a 500GB partition: /dev/sda1. Here is a summary of the results: Log location: - log location does not affect the file system performance as measured by the sequential output and sequential input tests - random seek rate improves with an external log (25%) - log location affe...

Hi everyone, I made a utility tool for dm-ioband version 0.0.4, named iobandctl. It enables you to easily apply I/O bandwidth control to an entire disk, and manage it. It helps you set the percentage of bandwidth to give each partition, and each user, process, group, or cgroup. (You are not able to use cgroup support yet, because the dm-ioband patch to enable cgroup support

Hi everyone, I made a utility tool for dm-ioband version 0.0.4, named iobandctl. It enables you to easily apply I/O bandwidth control to an entire disk, and manage it. It helps you set the percentage of bandwidth to give each partition, and each user, process, group, or cgroup. (You are not able to use cgroup support yet, because the dm-ioband patch to enable cgroup support

Hi everyone, I made a utility tool for dm-ioband version 0.0.4, named iobandctl. It enables you to easily apply I/O bandwidth control to an entire disk, and manage it. It helps you set the percentage of bandwidth to give each partition, and each user, process, group, or cgroup. (You are not able to use cgroup support yet, because the dm-ioband patch to enable cgroup support

I've taken my RH7.1 system, rebuild kernel (2.4.9 with ext3 patches) and followed the ext3 instructions to install. Everything seems to work OK but - df -k doesn't list the ext3 partition (my root partition). Is this a known problem ? If not, how best can I gather diagnostics to identify the source of the problem ? Thanks -- Philip Nelson (teamdba@bojnice.com)

...a running system to a new drive. As a postscript, I'm wondering if it would have been preferable to run the machine under a Live OS, and simply copy the root partition to the new drive? Eg while running under the LiveOS, # mkdir /mnt/old /mnt/new # mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/old # mount /dev/sdb6 /mnt/new # cp -avx /mnt/old /mnt/new or # rsync -ax --progress /mnt/old /mnt/new -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin

...hing I don't understand, when partitions are created, why does Linux number it awkwardly? For example, I created 1 Primary partition of 10% disk, then created 1 Extended partition of 90% disk. Inside that extended partition, I created 3 logical partitions 33% each. It went numbering sdb1, sdb5, sdb6 and sdb7. Where's the hell 2,3 and 4? Anyways, I've got my partitions now and formatted them so, it's all good. Thanks for your help with this. Next, as I went through Bacula's pages, I found that they mostly use tape drives for backup....ugh.......how can I use my usb partitions w...

...Jun 10 21:25:39 postamt1 kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device Jun 10 21:25:39 postamt1 kernel: 08:06: rw=0, want=1680353324, limit=59954548 Jun 10 21:25:39 postamt1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,6)): ext3_readdir: directory #3473659 contains a hole at offset 1852399616 $ mount /dev/sdb6 on / type auto (rw) none on /proc type proc (rw) /dev/sdb5 on /boot type ext3 (rw) /dev/sda6 on /home type ext3 (rw,nosuid,noatime) /dev/sdb8 on /tmp type ext3 (rw,nosuid,nocheck) /dev/sdb7 on /var type ext3 (rw,nosuid,noatime) /dev/sdb9 on /extra type ext3 (rw,noatime,data=journal,nocheck) /dev/hd...

...500108 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdb: 976773168 512-byte hdwr sectors (500108 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4 < sdb5 sdb6 > sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdb device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3 device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.5-ioctl (2007-12-12) initialised: dm-devel at redhat.com device-mapper: dm-raid45: initialized v0.2594l md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: autorun ... md: considering sdb6 ... md: adding sdb6 .....

...ogs-devel-1.41.4-12.fc11.x86_64 e2fsprogs-debuginfo-1.41.4-12.fc11.x86_64 mount: /dev/sdb8 on /srv/multimedia type ext3 (rw,relatime) $ df -hT Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb2 ext3 30G 1.1G 28G 4% / /dev/sdb7 ext3 20G 1.3G 18G 7% /var /dev/sdb6 ext3 30G 12G 17G 43% /usr /dev/sdb5 ext3 40G 25G 13G 67% /home /dev/sdb1 ext3 107M 52M 50M 52% /boot */dev/sdb8 ext3 111G 79G 27G 76% /srv/multimedia* tmpfs tmpfs 2.9G 35M 2.9G 2% /dev/shm Parted info: (parted) select /dev/sdb Using...

...AID level 1, but I'm unable to understand how to use the installer correctly. What I'm trying to do is emulate something I've already done with another distro where: sda5 \ RAID1 --> /boot sdb5 / sda6 \ RAID1 --> LVM --> /root, /home, /usr, /var... etc. sdb6 / I've succesfully created the raid, and the PV for LVM, but I can't figure out how to create a VG inside the PV. Is it possible using the installer, or should I better install it using one disk, and once installed create the raid/pv/vg, and move everything around by hand? Many thanks in...

Hi, I'm setting up ocfs on opensuse 10.3 with kernel 2.6.22.5-31 . Appreciate if you could guide on the solution to this error. I have a secondary hard disk (80G) created raw paritions primary /dev/sdb1 - 12G extended /dev/sdb2 - 12G comprising of /dev/sdb5 - 4G /dev/sdb6 - 3G /dev/sdb7 - 5G The error is as follows: Could not get a raw device slot for disk access. Please free up some devices. Error: Error opening /dev/rawctl No such file or directory, bindraw.c 63 Since there was mention of /dev/rawctl, i tried the following too: # mkdir /dev/raw cd /dev/raw mkno...

...dstat I see this: md7 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 26627648 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md2 : active raid1 sda5[0] sdb5[1] 4192832 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md3 : active raid1 sdb6[1] sda6[0] 4192832 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md4 : active raid1 sdb7[1] sda7[0] 4192832 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md5 : active raid0 sdb8[1] sda8[0] 8385536 blocks 256k chunks [-->>>>>> What's the meaning of this? Is it an error on the hdds...

Sorry, got it the wrong way around :-( Hello everybody! As I wrote in my mail the previous week ("BUG: 2.4.19pre1 & journal_thread & open filehandles") I followed the problem a little bit further. Here's my patch; I beg the ext3-maintainers (Stephen, Andreas, Andrew) to have a look at it and submit it to Marcelo and Linux for inclusion. (2.4 is for now for me more

greetings, had problems burning a dvd for 6.4, so i burned a livecd and installed it from boot menu to ext4 /dev/sdb3. during install, i defined mounting of /dev/sdb5 as /home and a second partition /dev/sdb6. both are ext4. first boot went well, set up user, rebooted. rebooted level 5, logged in as user, all looked good. rebooted level 5, logged in as root, made changes to /boot/grub/grub.conf to boot other os. rebooted level 5, logged in as user, opened terminal, su to root, tried to 'yum upda...

Hello! I installed NexentaOS (Opensolaris kernel b104+). First booting system is true. Before first rebooting system updates boot_archive. It''s false. Computer is freeze and CapsLock and ScrollLock is blinking. Helps only RESET button. My system is Ubuntu 8.10, kernel-2.6.30-rc3-tip, Xen-3.4-Stable with debug options enabled. My hardware: AMD Athlon64X2 5400+, RAM 4GB. For DomU: mem=1024,