Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "sdassert".
Did you mean:
dassert
2010 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] Possible SelectionDAG Bug
In the continuing quest to try to track down problems we're seeing in
SelectionDAG, I added the following assert
toSelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesOfValuesWith:
// Read up all the uses and make records of them. This helps
// processing new uses that are introduced during the
// replacement process.
SmallVector<UseMemo, 4> Uses;
for (unsigned i = 0; i != Num; ++i) {
unsigned
2010 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] Possible SelectionDAG Bug
...They fire
tons of times in the testbase.
This concerns me greatly.
Are all of these asserts valid? If not, we should document why with
comments in the source.
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sdassert.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5517 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100226/5387a80e/attachment.bin>