search for: sda11

...e benchmark results and other related information are available through this site. Please check it out: http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/ Bandwidth control on a per partition basis ========================================== Test procedure -------------- o Prepare three partitions sda11, sda12 and sda13. o Create three ioband devices ioband1, ioband2 and ioband3 on each partition respectively. o Give weights of 40, 20 and 10 to each ioband device respectively. o Run 50, 100 and 200 processes issuing random read/write direct I/O with 4KB data on each ioband device at...

...e benchmark results and other related information are available through this site. Please check it out: http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/ Bandwidth control on a per partition basis ========================================== Test procedure -------------- o Prepare three partitions sda11, sda12 and sda13. o Create three ioband devices ioband1, ioband2 and ioband3 on each partition respectively. o Give weights of 40, 20 and 10 to each ioband device respectively. o Run 50, 100 and 200 processes issuing random read/write direct I/O with 4KB data on each ioband device at...

...e benchmark results and other related information are available through this site. Please check it out: http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/ Bandwidth control on a per partition basis ========================================== Test procedure -------------- o Prepare three partitions sda11, sda12 and sda13. o Create three ioband devices ioband1, ioband2 and ioband3 on each partition respectively. o Give weights of 40, 20 and 10 to each ioband device respectively. o Run 50, 100 and 200 processes issuing random read/write direct I/O with 4KB data on each ioband device at...

...sic test and the results are cool. 1. single node test: first column is the result without inode allocation patches, and the second one with inode allocation patched enabled. You see we have great improvement with the second "ls -lR". echo 'y'|mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4K -C 4K -M local /dev/sda11 mount -t ocfs2 /dev/sda11 /mnt/ocfs2/ time tar jxvf /home/taoma/linux-2.6.28.tar.bz2 -C /mnt/ocfs2/ 1>/dev/null real 0m20.548s 0m20.106s umount /mnt/ocfs2/ echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches mount -t ocfs2 /dev/sda11 /mnt/ocfs2/ time ls -lR /mnt/ocfs2/ 1>/dev/null real 0m13.965s 0m13.76...

...familiar with KVM. Could anyone give me any advice? For dm-ioband details, please see the website at http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/ The number of issued I/Os -------------------------------------------------------------- | device | sda11 | sda12 | | weight setting | 80% | 20% | |----------------------+-------------------+-------------------| | KVM | I/Os | 4397 | 2902 | | | ratio to total | 60.2% | 39.8%...

...familiar with KVM. Could anyone give me any advice? For dm-ioband details, please see the website at http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/ The number of issued I/Os -------------------------------------------------------------- | device | sda11 | sda12 | | weight setting | 80% | 20% | |----------------------+-------------------+-------------------| | KVM | I/Os | 4397 | 2902 | | | ratio to total | 60.2% | 39.8%...

In ocfs2, the inode block search looks for the "emptiest" inode group to allocate from. So if an inode alloc file has many equally (or almost equally) empty groups, new inodes will tend to get spread out amongst them, which in turn can put them all over the disk. This is undesirable because directory operations on conceptually "nearby" inodes force a large number of seeks. So

Is this a known problem? I've seen this problem both under 2.0.6 and 2.0.7, on my Debian Linux system (kernel 2.2.14): A Win95 share that I mounted under smbfs will show up as mounted in df, and even contain the correct Used/Available info. If I do an 'ls' on the mountpoint, I see no files. If I 'umount' the share, I get the 'not mounted' error, but then no longer

...ich went unsovled here is what I did I compiled a Dom0 kernel and it compiled without any errors and then installed aptitude ubuntu-xen-desktop now when I adjusted grub I got errors like Error 15 File not found then I checked my grub directory and on grub command prompt manually started doing /dev/sda11 is where I have boot partition grub> root (hd0,10) then grub >kernel /xen-3.3.gz grub> module /xen-test-vmlinuz grub> module /initrd-test-2.6.29.img and then grub> boot hit enter finally machine gave me a screen with a lot of messages and then left me to (initramfs) ................

...9 256000000 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda7 76669 103440 215040000 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda8 103440 103466 204800 83 Linux /dev/sda9 103466 110477 56320000 83 Linux /dev/sda10 110477 111497 8192000 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda11 111497 117676 49629184 83 Linux// //Can you help me out?/ best regards, yours alex

...9 256000000 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda7 76669 103440 215040000 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda8 103440 103466 204800 83 Linux /dev/sda9 103466 110477 56320000 83 Linux /dev/sda10 110477 111497 8192000 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda11 111497 117676 49629184 83 Linux// //Can you help me out?/ best regards, yours alex

On 07/28/2016 04:20 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: <<>> > i do hope it is driver problem and not the touch pad. > ===> thank you Jesus. strange, but it was the driver. new install ran without a stall. lt is now recovered from 7-32 trashing. i would very much like to install 7-32, but it looks like it just may be that, like fine wine, 7-32 needs to age a little longer for my

.... this lt came with oos 7 already installed. after i tricked the oos 7 partition a few times to reduce size, i repartitioned drive with oos down to sda1= 1.6 GB system, sda2= 43.0 GB oos 7, sda4= 8.4 GB recovery, sda3= extended sda5= 1.1 GB boot, sda6= 3.1 GB swap, sda7 thru sda10= 11 GB linux os, sda11= 84 GB home, sda12= 66 GB open use. only reason i left oos 7 is that if i ever, God forbid, am forced to lower my self, it is installed. only times i have booted oos was during repartitioning to see if it had problems with sda3. it did not, i have not booted oos again. i did pull an update package...

On 07/29/2016 02:52 AM, Peter wrote: > On 29/07/16 18:10, John R Pierce wrote: >> also, try and scrounge another DDR2 SODIMM for that thing, according to >> my google search, it supports up to 2 x 4GB == 8GB, and you said you >> only have the stock 2GB. > > They are dirt cheap on ebay, from Hong Kong with free shipping. I would > go all the way and max it out. >

...ext3 defaults 1 2 > LABEL=/usr /usr ext3 defaults 1 2 > LABEL=/usr/local /usr/local ext3 defaults 1 2 > LABEL=/var /var ext3 defaults 1 2 > /dev/sda11 swap swap defaults 0 0 > /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom udf,iso9660 > noauto,owner,kudzu,ro 0 0 ============================================================================================= [root at advaitha /]# cat /proc/mounts rootf...

...088-87c0-5bde8470a8ba" SEC_TYPE="ext3" TYPE="ext2">/dev/sda9</device> <device DEVNO="0x080b" TIME="1079722753" LABEL="/0" UUID="655e3381-7157-463e-aaed-fe45a9617e79" SEC_TYPE="ext3" TYPE="ext2">/dev/sda11</device> <device DEVNO="0x0821" TIME="1079722753" LABEL="/2" UUID="b0971594-1529-406a-b969-278d4f770cb3" SEC_TYPE="ext3" TYPE="ext2">/dev/sdc1</device> <device DEVNO="0x0831" TIME="1079722753" LAB...

Hi all, I am trying to install OpenSUSE 11.1 as a para-virtualized DomU on an opensolaris2009.06 guest using the xvm packages provided via IPS. I followed the instructions available here: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/xen/docs/virtinstall/ but I get the following error when trying to install from a NFS share where I mounted the iso (as far as I understand the only way to get a Linux

.../sda7 7295 7902 4883728+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda8 7903 8145 1951866 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda9 8146 8511 2939863+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda10 8512 8574 506016 83 Linux /dev/sda11 8575 8637 506016 83 Linux /dev/sda12 8638 8700 506016 83 Linux /dev/sda13 8701 8825 1004031 83 Linux /dev/sda14 8826 8888 506016 83 Linux /dev/sda15 8889 9013 1004031 83 Linux...

Hi everyone, I am working on a project whose goal is evaluating the performance of the vTPM Manager. For this project I am using Xen 4.1, Kernel 2.6.31.13 with Fedora11. I I finished all installation and configuration parts. Now I need to boot the system with Xen but while booting, it is freezing at the step "scrubbing free ram". What can be cause this problem and how can I figure it

Hi everyone, I am working on a project whose goal is evaluating the performance of the vTPM Manager. For this project I am using Xen 4.1, Kernel 2.6.31.13 with Fedora11. I I finished all installation and configuration parts. Now I need to boot the system with Xen but while booting, it is freezing at the step "scrubbing free ram". What can be cause this problem and how can I figure it