search for: scrubber

...ately, the patch made no difference. > > > > I've been looking at how the graphics on my laptop is set up, and have a bit of a worry about whether the firmware might > > be playing a part in this problem. In order to offload video decoding to the NVidia TU117 GPU, it seems the scrubber > > firmware must be available, but as far as I know,that has not been released by NVidia. To get it to work, I followed > > what ubuntu have done and the scrubber in /lib/firmware/nvidia/tu117/nvdec/ is a symlink to > > ../../tu116/nvdev/scrubber.bin. That, of course, means that...

...ces are configured via udev, the root partition is mounted and the drivers can get at the firmware. > >>> > >>> I've found, by turning on nouveau debug and taking a video of the screen as the system shuts down, that nouveau seems to > >>> be trying to run the scrubber very very late in the shutdown process. The problem is that by this time, I think the root > >>> partition, and thus the scrubber binary, have become inaccessible. > >>> > >>> I seem to have two choices - either make the firmware accessible on an initrd or unload...

...dev, the root partition is mounted and the drivers can get at the firmware. > >>>>> > >>>>> I've found, by turning on nouveau debug and taking a video of the screen as the system shuts down, that nouveau seems to > >>>>> be trying to run the scrubber very very late in the shutdown process. The problem is that by this time, I think the root > >>>>> partition, and thus the scrubber binary, have become inaccessible. > >>>>> > >>>>> I seem to have two choices - either make the firmware accessibl...

...ined wait of 120 seconds. This default value is captured in the volume option 'features.expiry-time' and is configurable - in your case, it can be set to 0 or 1. > > Point 2 is correct. A file corrupted before the bitrot signature is generated will not be successfully detected by the scrubber. That would require admin/manual intervention to explicitly heal the corrupted file. > > -Sweta > > On 04/16/2018 10:42 PM, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am playing around with the bitrot feature and have some questions: >> >> 1. when a fil...

...nd the drivers can get at the firmware. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I've found, by turning on nouveau debug and taking a video of the screen as the system shuts down, that nouveau seems to > >>>>>>>> be trying to run the scrubber very very late in the shutdown process. The problem is that by this time, I think the root > >>>>>>>> partition, and thus the scrubber binary, have become inaccessible. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I seem to have two choices...

...modules, So, by > the time the devices are configured via udev, the root partition is mounted and the drivers can get at the firmware. > > I've found, by turning on nouveau debug and taking a video of the screen as the system shuts down, that nouveau seems to > be trying to run the scrubber very very late in the shutdown process. The problem is that by this time, I think the root > partition, and thus the scrubber binary, have become inaccessible. > > I seem to have two choices - either make the firmware accessible on an initrd or unload the module in a shutdown script > b...

...I get write permission is denied on /home/user. I've enabled the bitrot daemon but it's still running: Volume name : home State of scrub: Active (In Progress) Scrub impact: normal Scrub frequency: biweekly Bitrot error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/bitd.log Scrubber error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/scrub.log ========================================================= Node: localhost Number of Scrubbed files: 152451 Number of Skipped files: 197 Last completed scrub time: Scrubber pending to complete. Duration of last scrub (D:...

....Egger@amd.com> This patch uncovers a strange behaviour on 32bit. On 64bit I get this: (XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM 0xffff830000100000 -> 0xffff83003fff0000: ....done. On 32bit I get this: (XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM 0xffc00000 -> 0xdefb0000: .............................done. On 64bit the scrubber goes up, but on 32bit it goes down. Is this behaviour expected? -- AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany Operating System Research Center Legal Information: AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift): Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Deutschland Registergeric...

...lace the venerable html-scanner with Loofah, picking up where this issue left off: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/2550. Rafael França was assigned to that issue and he is my mentor during the summer. I want to hear your thoughts about a new API that will take advantage of Loofahs custom scrubbers. Here''s the example I gave in my project proposal<https://github.com/kaspth/gsoc-application> : class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base # block based # block takes a node scrubs :body do |node| node.remove if node.name == "script" end # method based # metho...

.../ filesystem (dev/sdb1) had badblocks. I reinstalled without checking for badblocks and the system refused to boot (again failing at the apm line). I left it overnight and this morning it decided to boot. Is this likely a hardware or software issue and if it is the latter is there a heavy duty disc scrubber to ensure a fresh RH install? Any help much appreciated!! --

...n; 53 void *scrub_image; 54 struct fw_bin_header *hsbin_hdr; 55 struct hsf_fw_header *fw_hdr; 56 struct hsf_load_header *lhdr; 57 void *scrub_data; 58 int ret; 59 60 nvkm_debug(subdev, "running VPR scrubber binary on NVDEC...\n"); 61 62 if (!(engine = nvkm_engine_ref(&device->nvdec->engine))) 63 return PTR_ERR(engine); This code doesn't make sense. nvkm_engine_ref() isn't going to return NULL because we're not passing a NULL to it....

Is there a method to view the status of the rams ecc single or double bit errors? I would like to confirm that ecc on my xeon e5520 and ecc ram are performing their role since memtest is ambiguous. I am running memory test on a p6t6 ws, e5520 xeon, 2gb samsung ecc modules and this is what is on the screen: Chipset: Core IMC (ECC : Detect / Correct) However, further down "ECC" is

I am having some trouble calculating the duration of my speex files. I am writing a speex player in Java and I am using the JSpeex port of the codec which works but doesn't give me the audio duration which I need to show progress or implement a scrubber. JSpeex appears to be all but dead but I don't see any other option for Java playback. I have tried the method posted here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2006-May/004509.html but it looks like I don't have direct access to the number of packets in the file. I am currently readi...

Say I''m firing off an at(1) or cron(1) job to do scrubs, and say I want to scrub two pools sequentially because they share one device. The first pool, BTW, is a mirror comprising of a smaller disk and a subset of a larger disk. The other pool is the remainder of the larger disk. I see no documentation mentioning how to scrub, then wait-until-completed. I''m happy to be pointed

...gr/gpccs_inst.bin nvidia/gp104/gr/gpccs_data.bin nvidia/gp104/gr/gpccs_sig.bin nvidia/gp104/sec2/image.bin nvidia/gp104/sec2/desc.bin nvidia/gp104/sec2/sig.bin nvidia/gp104/acr/ucode_load.bin nvidia/gp104/acr/ucode_unload.bin nvidia/gp104/acr/bl.bin nvidia/gp104/acr/unload_bl.bin nvidia/gp104/nvdec/scrubber.bin" > > Bisecting is kinda painful with miscompilation and init/main.c breakage. > > > > BTW do I need all those megabytes of firmware? > > > > [ 0.923273] fb0: switching to nouveaufb from EFI VGA > > [ 0.923440] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: NVIDIA GP104 (1...

...would the APIs exposed by libcxxabi be sufficient for the sanitizer runtimes? AFAICT, the only other way forward is to: 1) Move/re-implement the demangling (and hopefully the mangling as well) into llvm/Support, following proper style and writing proper unittests as we go. 2) Write my object-file-scrubber so that we can statically link llvm/Support into a runtime without collision issues. 3) Potentially split up llvm/Support (and other libraries) enough to have depending upon it not burden or bloat the runtime libraries unnecessarily. All of these options seem... moderately painful. My inclination...

For some reason, I didn't get Brians email, but I noticed it was replied to, so I'll copy from the archive > Is there an overview - in plain English - summarizing the API changes? No, not yet, as it isn't final yet. However, for the API changes, one only has to look at the header files, not the actual source files. > Without diving in to the source changes, my first question

...edetermined wait of 120 seconds. This default value is captured in the volume option 'features.expiry-time' and is configurable - in your case, it can be set to 0 or 1. Point 2 is correct. A file corrupted before the bitrot signature is generated will not be successfully detected by the scrubber. That would require admin/manual intervention to explicitly heal the corrupted file. -Sweta On 04/16/2018 10:42 PM, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > Hello, > > I am playing around with the bitrot feature and have some questions: > > 1. when a file is created, the "trusted.bit-rot.s...

...ve to hold down the power button fot a few seconds to switch it off. > > Linux 6.1 is OK but 6.2-rc1 hangs, so I bisected between this two and landed on: > > # first bad commit: [0e44c21708761977dcbea9b846b51a6fb684907a] drm/nouveau/flcn: new code to load+boot simple HS FWs > (VPR scrubber) > > I built and installed a kernel with f15cde64b66161bfa74fb58f4e5697d8265b802e (the parent of the bad commit) checked out > and that shuts down and reboots fine. It the did the same with the bad commit checked out and that does indeed hang, so > I'm confident the bisect outcome...

On 04/17/2018 06:25 PM, Omar Kohl wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question regarding bitrot detection. > > Following the RedHat manual (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.3/html/administration_guide/bitrot-restore_corrupt_file) I am trying out bad-file-restoration after bitrot. > > "gluster volume bitrot VOLNAME status" gets me the