search for: scriptlex

...gh priority. Since I'm complaining so much about it maybe I should take a look this weekend :) > > As far as I know, the grammar is LL(1), so it needs only one push-back > buffer. Handling INCLUDE directive can be a bit tricky though. > > Maybe we should rename ScriptParserBase ScriptLexer. > That sounds like a good idea. -- Sean Silva > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < > rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hmm..., the crux of not being able to lex arithmetic expressions seems >> to >> > be due...

> Hmm..., the crux of not being able to lex arithmetic expressions seems to > be due to lack of context sensitivity. E.g. consider `foo*bar`. Could be a > multiplication, or could be a glob pattern. > > Looking at the code more closely, adding context sensitivity wouldn't be > that hard. In fact, our ScriptParserBase class is actually a lexer (look at > the interface; it

...Since I'm > complaining so much about it maybe I should take a look this weekend :) > > > > As far as I know, the grammar is LL(1), so it needs only one push-back > buffer. Handling INCLUDE directive can be a bit tricky though. > > Maybe we should rename ScriptParserBase ScriptLexer. > > > That sounds like a good idea. > > -- Sean Silva > > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < > rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hmm..., the crux of not being able to lex arithmetic expressions seems to > &g...