search for: script_target

Op 2014-06-21 om 21:19 schreef intrigeri: > Hi, > > Ian Bannerman wrote (21 Jun 2014 15:49:51 GMT) : > > One advantage of the Perl one for me is that I can run it on Windows. > > We at Tails rely on isohybrid.pl for installing on OSX: > https://tails.boum.org/doc/first_steps/installation/manual/mac/ > > Of course, this does not mean that the current syslinux team

Op 2014-06-20 om 15:56 schreef Ady: > > The Perl variant, isohybrid.in, seems to be getting left behind > regarding several patches. I don't recall whether there is at least > some mention in the isohybrid docs about the existence of 2 variants > included in Syslinux (and that is in addition to other isohybrid > methods outside Syslinux). Is there any reference? >

...= $(GCCWARN) -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I$(SRC) -LDFLAGS = -O2 +CC = $(CC_FOR_BUILD) +CFLAGS = $(CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) $(GCCWARN) -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I$(SRC) +LDFLAGS = $(LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) -O2 C_TARGETS = isohybrid gethostip memdiskfind SCRIPT_TARGETS = mkdiskimage -- 2.1.4

Hi, > Not being compatible with EFI/GPT is already a problem for the Perl > variant. The relation of both is: isohybrid.in/.pl is being left behind. http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/utils/Makefile has: SCRIPT_TARGETS += isohybrid.pl # about to be obsoleted isohybrid.c replaces it feature-wise and adds new features. Only those new features contain the bugs, afaik. > Add the lack of documentation about the differences, ... and the fact that http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Doc/isolinux still des...

> Hi, > > Ady: > > Since both included variants are currently different, and both > > variants have problems > > I am not aware of problems of the perl version. It is just lacking > the newer features which support EFI/GPT and Mac/APM. > The known bugs of isohybrid.c are with those newer features. > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2012-May/017843.html >

Hi together, this is the second version of my cross-compilation patch serie. I'm sending it in the hope to get an honest review, and possibly see the patches integrated upstream. Those patches allow to build syslinux using a toolchain different from the host one by explicitely using the host toolchain for the utilities that are required at build-time / on the build machine. I am using the

...\ $(OPTFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) LDFLAGS = --- syslinux-6.04-pre1-BROKEN/utils/Makefile.ORIG 2016-03-04 17:21:56.879041790 +0100 +++ syslinux-6.04-pre1-BROKEN/utils/Makefile 2016-03-04 17:24:16.387537657 +0100 @@ -28,17 +28,17 @@ ASIS = $(addprefix $(SRC)/,keytab-lilo TARGETS = $(C_TARGETS) $(SCRIPT_TARGETS) -ISOHDPFX = $(addprefix $(OBJ)/,../mbr/isohdpfx.bin ../mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin \ - ../mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin \ - ../mbr/isohdppx.bin ../mbr/isohdppx_f.bin ../mbr/isohdppx_c.bin) +ISOHDPFX = $(addprefix $(OBJ)/,../bios/mbr/isohdpfx.bin ../bios/mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin \ + ../bios/mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin \...

Hi there, I've had issue with the integration of syslinux into the buildroot project [0]. After some research, it turned out that we were wrongly using the host toolchain instead of the target toolchain to build syslinux. This gave us bigger issues (for instance) when trying to link syslinux with gnu-efi, that was built using the target toolchain. The first one forces ld to output i386

> Hi, > > > Not being compatible with EFI/GPT is already a problem for the Perl > > variant. > > The relation of both is: > > isohybrid.in/.pl is being left behind. > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/utils/Makefile > has: > SCRIPT_TARGETS += isohybrid.pl # about to be obsoleted > > isohybrid.c replaces it feature-wise and adds new features. > Only those new features contain the bugs, afaik. I understand that the differences between the 2 variants are related to EFI/GPT/Apple. Whichever they are, the existence of 2 var...