search for: scpd

...ng planned, welcomed or whether there are some good reasons to keep scp alive. I have in my mind three things/steps that would make it possible: * Update sftp client to be drop-in replacement for scp (and/or) * Change scp to use sftp internally * Modify sshd to use some compatibility "scpd" to support old clients and some time later * Remove scp or replace it with a symlink [1] http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-8.0 Any ideas/comments/suggestions? Best regards, -- Jakub Jelen Senior Software Engineer Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc.

...different steps: > My naive approach would be to keep the scp user interface and switch > to the sftp protocol internally. We could add a -M [scp|sftp] option > to scp and select the internal protocol. Later we switch the default > from scp to sftp. > No need to change sshd or write scpd. Thank you all for comments and initial feedback. It looks like this is something that many people already had in minds, but for some reasons, it never happened. I tried to put together something that now works and passes the scp testsuite (with both scp and sftp modes): https://github.com/opens...

...o use sftp internally Then you either have no fallback for scp with very old servers, or a mess of either/or code to cope with both protocols. And it would seem more complex to change the protocol code than the UI code. > > * Modify sshd to use some compatibility "scpd" to support old clients > > and some time later > > * Remove scp or replace it with a symlink > > > [1] http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-8.0 > > Any ideas/comments/suggestions? > > > Best regards,...

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 14:07, David Newall <openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote: > [about scp] That's just awful, and I should have > thought it was not at all necessary. Am I missing something? > If you're saying that the scp protocol is an unfixable mess then the openssh team has been agreeing[0] with you for at least a decade and a half. We fix what we can, but some

Hello there! Yesterday I started my experiments with HTB. I configured it this way: 1: root HTB qdisc | 1:1 HTB class rate 1000kbit | /-------+------\ 1:40 1:50 1:60 user1 user2 user3 rate 333 & ceil 1000 for everyone. User2 is disconnected and user1 and user3 are downloading. For all the time (t1-t5) there are ONLY these two users downloading! HTB should give