search for: scoreboard

Hi all, I am using libvirt:qemu-kvm and I want to access(RO) the procfs of the guest vm. I was trying to use guestfs for the same purpose. I can access /tmp of the guest but not the /proc Is it a known issue? If so, how can I overcome the same? Any pointers? Snippet> [root@hv285 scoreboards]# virsh list Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 80 instance-00000121 running [root@hv285 scoreboards]# virt-cat -d instance-00000121 /tmp/uname Linux 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.XXXXX.20140407.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 7 11:31...

...] [info] Server built: Mar 11 2004 16:11:52 [Fri Mar 12 02:16:21 2004] [debug] prefork.c(1037): AcceptMutex: pthread (default: pthread) [Fri Mar 12 02:16:22 2004] [debug] util_ldap.c(1104): [1423] ldap cache init: Error 0 [Fri Mar 12 02:16:22 2004] [error] jk2_init() Can't find child 1423 in scoreboard [Fri Mar 12 02:16:22 2004] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2 [Fri Mar 12 02:16:22 2004] [debug] util_ldap.c(1104): [1424] ldap cache init: Error 0 [Fri Mar 12 02:16:22 2004] [error] jk2_init() Can't find child 1424 in scoreboard [Fri Mar 12 02:16:22 2004] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2 [Fri Mar...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15497 Summary: mlb.com scoreboard does not render correctly Product: swfdec Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: plugin AssignedTo: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org...

...USE 11.1 KDE 4.1 and I'm trying to install Team Fortress 2 which I installed by clicking run with wine on the setup.exe which was on the DVD. Steam installed installed with no problems, But when I start TF2: 1.I get no background image in the menu, 2. there is no crossair in the game, 3. the scoreboard doesn't appear by click tab, 4. the frag notifications doesn't work and 5. I can't see the progress when capturing a control point. But otherwise it runs well, the sound works and stuff. Lots of people got it to run perfectly in the WineHQ and I've seen a youtube video where he h...

...ed > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [info] Init: Initializing (virtual) > servers for SSL > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [info] mod_ssl/2.2.15 compiled against > Server: Apache/2.2.15, Library: OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [debug] proxy_util.c(1833): proxy: > grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 24112 for worker proxy:reverse > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [debug] proxy_util.c(1949): proxy: > initialized single connection worker 0 in child 24112 for (*) > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [debug] proxy_util.c(1833): proxy: > grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 24113 for w...

As I posted on AppDB my CSS Scoreboard (when you press tab) shows up blank, with no player names or scores despite having installed the Tahoma and Lucida fonts using winetricks. I'm using Ubuntu 10.10 with an nVidia GeForce Go 7700 video card.

Hi all, I am using libvirt:qemu-kvm and I want to access(RO) the procfs of the guest vm. I was trying to use guestfs for the same purpose. I can access /tmp of the guest but not the /proc Is it a known issue? If so, how can I overcome the same? Any pointers? Snippet> [root@hv285 scoreboards]# virsh list Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 80 instance-00000121 running [root@hv285 scoreboards]# virt-cat -d instance-00000121 /tmp/uname Linux 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.XXXXX.20140407.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 7 11:31...

ARM can reuse all the default scoreboard hazard recognizer logic such as recede cycle (naturally since its the primary client). If you can do the same with PPC that's great. Andy On Nov 29, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> Thanks! Since I have to change PPCHazardRecognizer for bottom-up suppo...

u've been already answered at web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/UmjnMJR2SGFfbbR1sAEu :)

Hal, On 6/11/2012 12:48 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > Ignoring compile time for a moment, I think an advantage of a DFA is modeling a situation where the hardware can assign resources to best fit the entire group rather then one instruction at a time. For example, if InstA requires either Unit0 or Unit1, and InstB requires Unit0, is {InstA, InstB} a valid group? Depending on your cpu, a DFA could

What is showing in the apache error log? ------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Thursday, May 07, 2015 04:28:16 PM -0400 > From: John <tuxfed at gmail.com> > > Directories permissions: 755 Files permissions: 644 > > On 15-05-07 04:21 PM, John wrote: >> I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/html are owned >> by apache:apache >>

...means that multiple instructions will stall in some pipeline stage until a complete group is formed, then all will continue. I expect to provide CPU-specific code to help determine when the currently-waiting instructions would form a group. Is there a straightforward way that I could override the scoreboard hazard detector (or layer on top of it) to insert this kind of logic? Should I instead be looking to do something like what Hexagon does for VLIW cores? I think the main difference between the PowerPC scheme and a VLIW scheme, is that the CPU itself can form groups internally, it is just more effi...

...:37 2015] [info] Init: Initializing (virtual) > > servers for SSL > > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [info] mod_ssl/2.2.15 compiled against > > Server: Apache/2.2.15, Library: OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips > > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [debug] proxy_util.c(1833): proxy: > > grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 24112 for worker proxy:reverse > > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [debug] proxy_util.c(1949): proxy: > > initialized single connection worker 0 in child 24112 for (*) > > [Thu May 07 15:09:37 2015] [debug] proxy_util.c(1833): proxy: > > grabbed scoreboard slot 0...

...ructions will stall in some pipeline stage > until a complete group is formed, then all will continue. > > I expect to provide CPU-specific code to help determine when the > currently-waiting instructions would form a group. Is there a > straightforward way that I could override the scoreboard hazard > detector (or layer on top of it) to insert this kind of logic? > > Should I instead be looking to do something like what Hexagon does > for VLIW cores? I think the main difference between the PowerPC scheme > and a VLIW scheme, is that the CPU itself can form groups interna...

On Jun 11, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Looking at VLIWPacketizerList::PacketizeMIs, it seems like the > instructions are first scheduled (via some external scheme?), and then > packetized 'in order'. Is that correct? Anshu? > In the PowerPC grouping scheme, resources are assigned on a group > basis (by the instruction dispatching

...d have been more clear, the ARM implementation has: void ARMHazardRecognizer::RecedeCycle() { llvm_unreachable("reverse ARM hazard checking unsupported"); } How does that work? Thanks again, Hal On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 09:47 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > ARM can reuse all the default scoreboard hazard recognizer logic such as recede cycle (naturally since its the primary client). If you can do the same with PPC that's great. > > Andy > > On Nov 29, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > >> Thanks! Since I have to change PPCHazard...

...C, now that Hybrid > > scheduling is enabled, EmitInstruction seems never to be called (at > > least it is not called when running any PPC codegen test in the > > regression-test collection). > > > Hal, > > > Since PPCHazardRecognizer is not derived from > ScoreboardHazardRecognizer, you'll need to initialize MaxLookAhead to > the max depth of your target's itinerary. Andy, Thanks! Since I have to change PPCHazardRecognizer for bottom-up support anyway, is there any reason not to have it derive from ScoreboardHazardRecognizer at this point? It look...

...t; pipeline stage until a complete group is formed, then all will > > continue. > > > > I expect to provide CPU-specific code to help determine when the > > currently-waiting instructions would form a group. Is there a > > straightforward way that I could override the scoreboard hazard > > detector (or layer on top of it) to insert this kind of logic? > > > > Should I instead be looking to do something like what Hexagon does > > for VLIW cores? I think the main difference between the PowerPC > > scheme and a VLIW scheme, is that the CPU itsel...

..., in order to implement a really trivial (and really inefficient) backtracking mechanism. This approach leads to a subtle "segmentation fault", when the pass ends and invokes the deleter. The reason of the fault is due to the custom deleter of SchedBoundary, which explicitly deletes the scoreboard object. Follows that, since both the boundary objects, the original and the copy, hold  a pointer to the same object, a double "delete" is performed. I think this is an issue deriving from the design: if SchedBoundary is designed to be copiable, then solutions may be:     1. The pointer...

Dear All, I am following a flow to generate object files(.o) from input (.s assembly) files. The input .s is given to AsmParser, which creates MCInst after matching instruction opcode. These MCInst are converted to MCStream and then finally emitting to an object file using Target Code Emitter. I am considering whether hazard recognition can be done on the list of MCInst, which I get after