search for: scopeids

hi*& I have troubles with joining 2 NT PDC because I can not specify scopeID for smbpasswd command. What can I do? There is analogu problem with smb_mount, that not understand different scopeIDs. Any advices? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, i've got this problem with my jail and i'm abolutly lost as in the why of it. I previously posted this on comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc but i was advised to send here I was unable to find help on google :( To resume quick, when i'm in a jail, netstat doesn't work properly. Hopefully i have provided sufficient information for anyone willing to help me :p First of all, my system :

samba generates an unknown ip4 and ip6 address. here is my settings: root at server:/# ifconfig enp1s0f2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.81.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.81.255 inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> inet6 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 prefixlen 64 scopeid

Hi, I have a client that was using a scope ID with 1.9.x and when we upgraded to 2.2.2, the "-i" option no longer worked. I also can't find any reference to "netbios scope" in the smb.conf man page. I noticed smbclient still has it as an option. I don't particularly like scope IDs, so I already know not to use them, but what's the status of it? Thanks.

Hello, I have a big problem with my servers. I have 4 NIC on all my KVM Servers but the most time on a start (restart) I lost one NIC? It is not always the same, but this two are virtio NICs. with ifup eth0(1) the system say,I have no configured eth0 or eth1 file ? Can any tell me what I can do? thank's for a answer NetworkManager is disabled. -- mit freundlichen Gr??en / best regards,

Hello Am Friday 11 December 2015, 10:13:00 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 12/11/2015 06:04 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > > I have 4 NIC on all my KVM Servers but the most time on a start (restart) > > I > > lost one NIC? It is not always the same, but this two are virtio NICs. > > > > with ifup eth0(1) the system say,I have no configured eth0 or eth1 file ?

I have just checked the Openbsd box on the if interface. fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 address: 00:02:55:30:54:28 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::202:55ff:fe30:5428%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 xl0:

the dig is wrong as well, it adds an additional ip address, which i have not request to use other interfaces: root at server:/# dig p3x-dc.patrikx3.com ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1-Debian <<>> p3x-dc.patrikx3.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11190 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0,

sorry i mean dnsupdate, if i use bind9 with samba dlz dnsupdate does not work, so i have to leave it out. my problem is that i got 2 interfaces and still it 2 dual stack ip addresses, the 192.168.78.0/24 is correct. the 192.168.81.0/24 is giving 192.168.81.120 instead of 192.168.81.20. i found the whole root since "/" with grep there is no 192.168.81.120 at all. only in my router there

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161 Bug ID: 3161 Summary: ssh -J <public IPv6> <LL IPv6%scopeID> doesn't work as expected Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: 68k OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

On 03/08/2019 11:17, Patrik wrote: > the problem is that dnsupdate is not working becuase i use dlz. i > cannot use dbsupdate with dnsupdate it fails. > *_ > _* What is 'dbsupdate' ? I can assure you that dnsupdate does work with dlz. I think you need to give us more info. Rowland

Hi there, I've installed a new KVM-Server. The routing in all instances are only working after "arp -s ip_of_router mac_of_router" Server: CentOS7, KVM Clients: CentOS6 and Fedora 21 What going wrong? [root at bgstkvmlr01 ~]# ifconfig bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::3ed9:2bff:fe0b:c706 prefixlen 64 scopeid

Hi there, I'm playing with CentOS 7 (don't know if it's recommended at all have this one as a development server as maybe is not stable enough yet) and I installed it on a Vmware VM with two network interfaces: one as a bridged connected directly to the physical network and replicating the network state and the second one as a host only interface (the one I use to manage the VM) so

Hi Laine What you have suggested sounds eminently reasonable. Thanks for your advice. I'm going to give it a shot and report back. Richard On 11/27/19 1:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: >> Hello >> >> I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. >> >> Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

Hi, Is anyone here using the "Network Connect" VPN software from Pulse Secure (which was previously known as Juniper Networks Network Connect)? I've used this successfully in the past to connect to the machines at work from home. That was with CentOS 6, though, on CentOS 7 I can't seem to get it to work. The software actually starts, and it also successfully sets up a

Hello I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts connected by a physical switch.  Each host has two NICs leading to the switch, which have been combined into a team, team0. Each host a has a bridge br1, which has team0 as a slave. So communication between hosts is based on the IP address of bridge br1 on each host. Up until

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> >>> In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581b5e at domblogger.net>, >>> Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The last release (4.8.1) was back in January. Things have been pretty quiet but we've had a few bugs fixed since then, so it's probably time for another release. Not a lot of major changes with this one -- mostly just bugfixes. The main changes since 4.8.1 are: * Some distros (namely Fedora) are moving to having /etc/mtab be a symlink to