search for: scoped_ptr

On Monday 17 December 2007 13:39, Evan Cheng wrote: > My only concern is the potential compile time impact. Do you see any? I don't notice any, but then I'm not particularly looking for that either. I'll run some tests. I also accidentally included some debugging code I added to track down this prioritization problem (the queue dumping code). I'll remove that before I

...> I'll wait for Chris' comments re: licensing. Re licensing, we have no problem slurping in boost code. Please do make it follow the LLVM standards (80 cols and a doxygen comment above each class saying what it is for). For an example of how to do the license, see include/llvm/ADT/scoped_ptr.h. Thanks for finding these bugs David! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

...I assume this is ok, but want to check. > Re licensing, we have no problem slurping in boost code. Please do make > it follow the LLVM standards (80 cols and a doxygen comment above each > class saying what it is for). For an example of how to do the license, > see include/llvm/ADT/scoped_ptr.h. No problem. -Dave

...t; Re licensing, we have no problem slurping in boost code. Please >> do make >> it follow the LLVM standards (80 cols and a doxygen comment above >> each >> class saying what it is for). For an example of how to do the >> license, >> see include/llvm/ADT/scoped_ptr.h. > > No problem. > > -Dave > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev