search for: schmutz

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "schmutz".

Did you mean: schmitz
2004 Jan 09
2
strange behaviour when converting from char to POSIX (PR#6422)
Full_Name: Christoph Schmutz, MeteoSchweiz, Switzerland Version: R1.7.1, R1.8.1 OS: windows2000, solaris sunOS 5.8 Submission from: (NULL) (141.249.133.6) I'm not sure if I don't get the clue, but please consider this: > strptime("19930870150","%Y%j%H%M") [1] "1993-03-28 01:50:00" &g...
2007 Nov 09
1
fisher.test, chisq.test
Hi, I want to analyse a contigency table (3 x 12) with a fisher.test beacause there are cells that are less than 5. ?mmen Anken Baf Belchen H?chi Hof Porti R?m Schmutz Sch?n Sissa Tann class14 7 26 150 2 46 68 126 66 3 31 7 61 class24 7 6 55 5 49 71 93 90 1 18 16 79 class34 1 1 4 3 19 8 29 61 4 4 5 37 So in made a matrix and used >fisher.test(clas...
2004 Jan 09
0
strange behaviour when converting from char to POSIX (PR#6423)
...Xct(strptime("19930870001","%Y%j%H%M")) -> foo > foo [1] "1993-03-28 00:01:00 GMT Standard Time" > foo+3480 [1] "1993-03-28 00:59:00 GMT Standard Time" > foo+3540 [1] "1993-03-28 02:00:00 GMT Daylight Time" On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 christoph.schmutz@meteoschweiz.ch wrote: > Full_Name: Christoph Schmutz, MeteoSchweiz, Switzerland > Version: R1.7.1, R1.8.1 > OS: windows2000, solaris sunOS 5.8 > Submission from: (NULL) (141.249.133.6) > > > > I'm not sure if I don't get the clue, but please consider this: > &gt...
2004 Jan 11
1
strange behaviour when converting from char to POSIX (PR#6427)
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:01:27PM +0100, christoph.schmutz@meteoschweiz.ch wrote: > > Full_Name: Christoph Schmutz, MeteoSchweiz, Switzerland > > Version: R1.7.1, R1.8.1 > > OS: windows2000, solaris sunOS 5.8 > > Submission from: (NULL) (141.249.133.6) > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if I don't get th...
2006 Jan 06
4
Design flaw with Fixtures?
I''ve been trying to add unit testing for collection of models with complex relationships -- and failing miserably. Because of the complexity of the relationships, I''m using a database which validates foreign key constraints (PostgreSQL 8). I''m finding it nearly impossible to generate tests that are independent of each other. The basic problem is the DELETE then