search for: scheller

Tilmann Scheller <tilmann.scheller at googlemail.com> writes: [snip] > It might be worth to put an Eclipse CDT project file with relative > paths to the header files in the LLVM SVN repository to make it easier > for people to use Eclipse in the future (my project files currently > contain absol...

On Jul 17, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Tilmann Scheller <tscheller at apple.com> wrote: > I actually never did a build with Eclipse, only used it for code navigation and debugging :) Actually that’s not really true, I did build with Eclipse from time to time to get all the sources TableGen generates automatically. This is really nice because t...

Hi Viktor, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> writes: > > >> To me, increasing coverage of the FastISel seemed more involved than > >> directly emitting opcodes to memory, with a lesser outlook on > >> reducing overhead. > > > > That seems extremely unlikely.

Hi Patrick, On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Patrick Alexander Simmons<simmon12 at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Has anyone tried using the Eclipse CDT plugin (or another C++ IDE) to > develop code in LLVM? I'm specifically interested in getting code > completion to work. I've been sucessfully using the Eclipse CDT with LLVM for quite a while now. The official releases of Eclipse

Hi Oscar, On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> It might be worth to put an Eclipse CDT project file with relative >> paths to the header files in the LLVM SVN repository to make it easier >> for people to use Eclipse in the future (my project files currently >> contain absolute paths, so they're probably not useful to other

Tilmann Scheller <tilmann.scheller at googlemail.com> writes: > Apparently CMake deletes the C++ files which are generated by > TableGen, is it possible to tell CMake to not throw them away? Certainly the build does not delete those files. Maybe you looked at the wrong place. Try $OBJDIR/lib/Target/X8...

...internal drive the default main OS. Study the extlinux manual gave me no idea to realize such a menu for extlinux and I hope now to get a guidance from syslinux experts that solve this problem. Sorry for my bad english because for most of this words I used a dictonary. Yours faithfully Wolfgang Scheller

Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> writes: >> To me, increasing coverage of the FastISel seemed more involved than >> directly emitting opcodes to memory, with a lesser outlook on >> reducing overhead. > > That seems extremely unlikely. You'd be effectively re-implementing > both fast-isel and the MC binary emitter layers, and it sounds like a > new

On 07/16/2013 05:21 AM, Tilmann Scheller wrote: > Hi Reed, > > I’ve used Eclipse for a long time to do LLVM development on Linux (both for code navigation/editing and debugging), any recent Linux distribution and version of Eclipse should be fine (even older versions should be good enough as this has been working for many years)....

...tions that get written directly to the executable memory. In CACAO, registers are used while available, then everything is spilled. Relocations are resolved and patched in a second go. It seems this is similar to what Tilmann refers to in the old qemu JIT: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Tilmann Scheller <tilmann.scheller at googlemail.com> wrote: > The old qemu JIT used an extremely simple and fast approach which performed > surprisingly well: Having chunks of precompiled machine code (from C > sources) for the individual IR instructions which at runtime get glued > together and...

Has anyone tried using the Eclipse CDT plugin (or another C++ IDE) to develop code in LLVM? I'm specifically interested in getting code completion to work. --Patrick

Hi Reed, I’ve used Eclipse for a long time to do LLVM development on Linux (both for code navigation/editing and debugging), any recent Linux distribution and version of Eclipse should be fine (even older versions should be good enough as this has been working for many years). Xcode works fine as well, I started to use Xcode exclusively when I switched to OS X. The key to make this work is to

Is anyone using Eclipse and gdb to debug llvm/clang? If so, which version of Eclipse, gdb and linux flavor. I just use gdb currently. I'm going to try using my mac also. Is anyone using xcode/lldb to debug llvm/clang? Tia. Reed

...al//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Thanks to all those who responded to our email.<br> <br> Tilmann Scheller wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:aec43a860804051030g14d8514agb574f7fdcbbc9be6@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <div class="gmail_quote"> <div><br> However, there is still potential for improvement, one being an efficient implementation of direct b...

Hi, I'm having problem with generating ppc64-assembler code. First I create ppc64-assembler with llc: llc -march=ppc64 gzip.bc -f -o gzip.s Then I try to compile this with a cross-compiler on x86_64-linux to ppc64-linux: .../crosstools/gcc-4.2.4-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc gzip.s But the compiler gives me gzip.4.s: Assembler messages:

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Is there something wrong with my cross-compiler or is the llc-generated code bad? Most likely the latter, the powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu target is not officially supported by LLVM. In fact there is no support for the 64-bit PowerPC Linux ABI in the PPC backend at all. The generated assembly is

Hi, Tilmann Scheller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas > Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >> Is there something wrong with my cross-compiler or is the llc-generated code bad? > Most likely the latter, the powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu target is not > officially...

What was the first target for LLVM? Tia. Reed

Hi Reed, I think it was SPARC, feel free to correct me though :) Regards, Tilmann On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:21 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > What was the first target for LLVM? > > Tia. > > Reed > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >

...s is a production system with 80+ users so any downtime can be detrimental to the business. Rather than continuing to research, I would like to see if there are some "rock-solid" configurations from a hardware stand point that may improve the situation. Thank you for any feedback. Bob Scheller -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060310/9526ea82/attachment.htm