Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "schedulepostratdlist".
2017 Oct 25
2
Empty implementation of SchedulingPriorityQueue::dump
Hi All,
While reading SchedulePostRATDList::ListScheduleTopDown() [1], I
find SchedulingPriorityQueue::dump has an empty implementation. Therefore,
the following debug dump basically outputs nothing.
DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n*** Examining Available\n";
AvailableQueue.dump(this));
Not sure why we want this. Is it intended...
2017 Jun 09
2
[Newbie Question] Compute a schedule region's scheduled cycles.
...rs that does the following:
1. Find candidate nodes in the DAG, and speculatively modify the node (nodes).
2. After modification, try to compute the scheduled cycles of the region.
3. If the cycle number improves, go back to 1. to find the next candidate node.
I am thinking using SchedulePostRATDList's top-down algorithm to calculate the cycles needed for the region's execution. However, it decomposes the schedule DAG while calculating the cycles --- In my case I want to keep the DAG so that we don't need to construct it again in the following steps.
So my question is: is there a w...
2017 Jun 09
2
[Newbie Question] Compute a schedule region's scheduled cycles.
...he
>> node (nodes).
>>
>> 2. After modification, try to compute the scheduled cycles of the
>> region.
>>
>> 3. If the cycle number improves, go back to 1. to find the next
>> candidate node.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking using SchedulePostRATDList’s top-down algorithm to
>> calculate the cycles needed for the region’s execution. However, it
>> decomposes the schedule DAG while calculating the cycles --- In my case I
>> want to keep the DAG so that we don’t need to construct it again in the
>> following steps.
>>...
2016 Apr 20
2
How to get started with instruction scheduling? Advice needed.
...;
> - Pre 2008: SelectionDAGISel pass creates the ScheduleDAG from the
> SelectionDAG at the end of instruction selection
> - ScheduleDAG works on SelectionDAG Nodes (SDNodes)
> - Circa 2008: Post Register
>
> Allocation pass added for
>
> instruction selection ( SchedulePostRATDList
>
> works on MachineInstrs)
>
> - Circa 2012: MIScheduler
>
> (ScheduleDAGMI) added as
>
> separate pass for pre-RA
>
> scheduling
>
> - Circa 2014: MIScheduler
>
> adapted to optionally replace
>
> PostRA Scheduler
>
> In the presentation...
2016 Apr 26
3
How to get started with instruction scheduling? Advice needed.
...roach scheduling in LLVM over the years:
* Pre 2008: SelectionDAGISel pass creates the ScheduleDAG from the SelectionDAG at the end of instruction selection
* ScheduleDAG works on SelectionDAG Nodes (SDNodes)
* Circa 2008: Post Register
Allocation pass added for
instruction selection ( SchedulePostRATDList
works on MachineInstrs)
* Circa 2012: MIScheduler
(ScheduleDAGMI) added as
separate pass for pre-RA
scheduling
* Circa 2014: MIScheduler
adapted to optionally replace
PostRA Scheduler
In the presentation he goes with defining a subclass of SchedMachineModel in the schedule .td file. And...
2017 Feb 11
2
Specify special cases of delay slots in the back end
...the functional units, processor and instruction itineraries.
Regarding the Stalls argument to my method
[Target]DispatchGroupSBHazardRecognizer::getHazardType() I always get the argument Stalls
= 0. This is no surprise since in PostRASchedulerList.cpp we have only one call to it, in
method SchedulePostRATDList::ListScheduleTopDown():
ScheduleHazardRecognizer::HazardType HT =
HazardRec->getHazardType(CurSUnit, 0/*no stalls*/);
Let me state what I have added to my back end to enable scheduling with hazards:
- inspiring from lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCHazardRecognizers.h, I have c...
2017 Feb 10
2
Specify special cases of delay slots in the back end
Hello.
I am progressing a bit with difficulty with the post RA scheduler
(PostRASchedulerList.cpp with ScoreboardHazardRecognizer) - the problem I have is that it
doesn't advance at the next available instruction when the overridden
ScoreboardHazardRecognizer::getHazardType() method returns NoopHazard and it gets stuck at
the same instruction (store in my runs).
Just to make sure: