search for: schedulemi

...ut and at this point I'm not sure what is important and what is not. I'm trying to solve this problem in small steps, so if asked I can certainly provide more information. The first error that I see during compilation is lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, bool): Assertion `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of sync"' failed. Another important detail is that we are running clang-3.5. I know it is old, but for now we are not allowed to switch to a newer version. I would greatly appreciate any help on this...

...Parzyszek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 4/27/2016 12:10 PM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev wrote: > >> >> The first error that I see during compilation is >> >> lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void >> llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, bool): Assertion >> `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of sync"' failed. >> > > This happens on Hexagon too. I have a patch for review: > http://reviews.llvm.org/D19438 > > -Krzysztof > > > -- > Qualcomm Innovatio...

...lvm.org>> wrote: >> >> On 4/27/2016 12:10 PM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >> The first error that I see during compilation is >> >> lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void >> llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, bool): Assertion >> `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of sync"' failed. >> >> >> This happens on Hexagon too. I have a patch for review: >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D19438 >> >> -Krzysztof &...

...e: > > On 4/27/2016 12:10 PM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev wrote: > > > The first error that I see during compilation is > > lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp:1165: void > llvm::ScheduleDAGMILive::scheduleMI(llvm::SUnit*, > bool): Assertion > `TopRPTracker.getPos() == CurrentTop && "out of > sync"' failed. > > > This happens on Hexagon too. I have a patch for review: > http://reviews.ll...