Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "scheding".
Did you mean:
scheduing
2010 Nov 26
0
CPU Scheding package
Hi everybody,
I would like to know if there is any CPU scheduling package in R. Anybody knows?
Thanks,
Romildo
2016 Jul 07
5
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:48:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-07-06 20:28 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
> > Hmm, you're right. We can use bit 0 of struct kvm_steal_time's flags to
> > indicate that pad[0] is a "VCPU preempted" field; if pad[0] is 1, the
> > VCPU has been scheduled out since the last time the guest reset the
2016 Jul 07
5
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:48:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-07-06 20:28 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
> > Hmm, you're right. We can use bit 0 of struct kvm_steal_time's flags to
> > indicate that pad[0] is a "VCPU preempted" field; if pad[0] is 1, the
> > VCPU has been scheduled out since the last time the guest reset the
2016 Jul 06
3
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
On 06/07/2016 14:08, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-07-06 18:44 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
>>
>>
>> On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>>> change fomr v1:
>>>> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
>>>> skip mahcine
2016 Jul 06
3
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
On 06/07/2016 14:08, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-07-06 18:44 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
>>
>>
>> On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>>> change fomr v1:
>>>> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
>>>> skip mahcine
2016 Jul 07
0
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
2016-07-07 17:42 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:48:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> 2016-07-06 20:28 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
>> > Hmm, you're right. We can use bit 0 of struct kvm_steal_time's flags to
>> > indicate that pad[0] is a "VCPU preempted" field; if pad[0]
2016 Jul 07
0
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
2016-07-06 20:28 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
>
>
> On 06/07/2016 14:08, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> 2016-07-06 18:44 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>>>> change fomr
2016 Jul 07
1
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
2016-07-07 18:12 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp at gmail.com>:
> 2016-07-07 17:42 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:48:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> 2016-07-06 20:28 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
>>> > Hmm, you're right. We can use bit 0 of struct kvm_steal_time's flags
2016 Jul 07
1
[PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
2016-07-07 18:12 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp at gmail.com>:
> 2016-07-07 17:42 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:48:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> 2016-07-06 20:28 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>:
>>> > Hmm, you're right. We can use bit 0 of struct kvm_steal_time's flags