Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "schani".
Did you mean:
schanz
2006 Feb 22
0
Problem: Null values in a CSV format fixture show up a 0 in the test database
...rrors.
As a work around, I commented out my validate, but I''d like to turn
it back on.
I''m running the following:
Mac OSX 10.4.5
Ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]
Rails 1.0.0
Thanks for any help.
-Steve
_____________________
Steven Chanin
steven.chanin@gmail.com
schani@sapient.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060222/3627db2b/attachment.html
2003 Feb 25
2
Configuration file format changes
After tomorrow's 0.99.8 release I think it's time for a new config file
format. It could be made backwards compatibile with the old format, but
there would be new tree-like categories. I was thinking something like
this:
# global settings
protocols = imap
# "foo.server.org" is just descriptive name
# settings inside server { .. } will override global ones.
# groups (namespace,
2010 Jan 04
0
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation
On Monday 04 January 2010 05:16:40 Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> > LLVM's TCO already handles mutual recursion.
>
> Only for fastcc functions
Yes.
> compiled with -tailcallopt, right?
If you use the compiler, yes.
> http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#tailcallopt
>
> I believe
2010 Jan 04
2
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> On Monday 04 January 2010 03:33:06 Simon Harris wrote:
>> On 04/01/2010, at 3:01 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>> > I am certainly interested in tail calls because my HLVM project relies
>> > upon LLVM's tail call elimination. However, I do not understand what tail
>> > calls LLVM