search for: sch_esfq

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "sch_esfq".

2004 Aug 17
2
esfq hash type
Hi I have a small lan (10.0.0.0/8) behind my linux box. I use MASQUERADE to allow users connects to internet. I set up an esfq qdisc for outgoing traffic. And there is a little question. Does source hash type in esfq recognize NATed local ip''s? -- Pozdrawiam Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing
2004 Feb 26
1
ESFQ Modification
...+151,9 @@ case TCA_SFQ_HASH_SRC: fprintf(f,"src"); break; + case TCA_SFQ_HASH_FWMARK: + fprintf(f,"fw"); + break; default: fprintf(f,"Unknown"); } diff -urN ./orig/sch_esfq.c ./patched/sch_esfq.c --- ./orig/sch_esfq.c 2004-02-26 09:27:54.000000000 +0100 +++ ./patched/sch_esfq.c 2004-01-07 21:39:24.000000000 +0100 @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ { u32 h, h2; u32 hs; + u32 nfm; switch (skb->protocol) { case __constant_htons(ETH_P...
2005 Jan 04
11
ESFQ?
Hi again, I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I see that the main site is down, and only has kernel 2.6.4 patches. Is ESFQ maintained? If so, where can I find patches for 2.6.10? Thanks, -justin _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2006 Dec 12
1
Layer7 module doesn''t detect nothing on my bridge with a 2.6.18.3 kernel
...959 (129.6 MiB) TX bytes:162558207 (155.0 MiB) Base address:0xd100 Memory:f1000000-f1020000 # lsmod Module Size Used by ipt_ipp2p 6400 0 ipt_LOG 5248 2 xt_multiport 2176 4 ipt_layer7 8840 14 cls_u32 5636 6 sch_esfq 4736 10 xt_CLASSIFY 1024 28 xt_limit 1280 0 ipt_TOS 1152 0 xt_length 1152 6 ipt_tos 896 2 sch_htb 12544 2 xt_physdev 1808 2 floppy 44580 0 e1000...
2006 Dec 14
0
Re: [RESOLVED] Layer7 module doesn''t detect nothing on my bridge with a 2.6.18.3 kernel
...00-f1020000 >> >> # lsmod >> Module Size Used by >> ipt_ipp2p 6400 0 >> ipt_LOG 5248 2 >> xt_multiport 2176 4 >> ipt_layer7 8840 14 >> cls_u32 5636 6 >> sch_esfq 4736 10 >> xt_CLASSIFY 1024 28 >> xt_limit 1280 0 >> ipt_TOS 1152 0 >> xt_length 1152 6 >> ipt_tos 896 2 >> sch_htb 12544 2 >> xt_physdev...
2004 Nov 24
8
tc and iptables trouble
...5772 - sch_ingress 2604 - ipt_TCPMSS 3208 - iptable_filter 1864 - ipt_MARK 1512 - cls_fw 3208 - iptable_mangle 1832 - ppp_async 7816 - crc_ccitt 1512 - ip_gre 8672 - sch_esfq 4936 - sch_netem 4808 - ipt_connlimit 2248 - ipt_connmark 1160 - sch_gred 5704 - sch_red 3368 - sch_hfsc 16360 - sch_cbq 13864 - sch_prio 3528 - sch_tbf...
2005 Oct 15
5
esfq ? or wrr ?
Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres
2007 Jun 24
5
ESFQ: request for user input
..., if any maintainers read this, I would value their input at this point as well. Here are some advantages and disadvantages of merging ESFQ with SFQ. Please correct me or let me know of any others you think of. ---Advantages--- * There''s nothing radically different about ESFQ. A separate sch_esfq.c would duplicate lots of the code in sch_sfq.c. * Current users of SFQ would benefit from the better hashing of using jhash. Other than that, the default parameters of ESFQ are the same as SFQ''s hardcoded values, so ESFQ would be a drop-in replacement. * Having two similar-looking s...
2004 Mar 12
0
for testing/examiniation: updated esfq patch for 2.6.4
...its own headers in /usr/include, and iproute2 needs to reference the patched pkt_sched.h. I don''t know what the best way around this is. Please note that I don''t really know what I''m doing. The process seemed straightforward enough and so loading and using the new sch_esfq module hasn''t caused my computer to crash, complain, melt, or walk away. Actually, it seems to work as expected; however, don''t blame me if you use the patch and something starts setting the evil bit on all your packets. I''m posting this partly because I hope somebody wh...