search for: scf_codewidth

...or thread that has surely been covered > many times before: Is there a reason to still cling to the 80 column > limit and not consider expanding it to a controversial 100 columns? This isn't open for debate and is covered in the coding standards: http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#scf_codewidth -Chris

On Jul 8, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, David Greene wrote: >>> Since I think it really is a part of the LLVM internals, I don't >>> think >>> that mangling it with a prefix is the right way to go. This would >>> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally >>> detrimental. >>