search for: scapy

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966 Summary: iptables can't change or drop or any effect on scapy packet! Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org...

...iority -300; policy accept; fib saddr . iif oif 0 udp dport 1337 counter packets 0 bytes 0 fib saddr . iif oif "enp0s5" udp dport 1337 counter packets 0 bytes 0 fib saddr . iif oif "enp0s6" udp dport 1337 counter packets 0 bytes 0 } } Using Scapy on another host, we now send some packets to the wrong interface (to enp0s6 with a source address belonging to enp0s5's net): >>> e = Ether(dst='00:1c:42:5c:28:c0') >>> i = IPv6(src='fd00::1', dst='fd11::3') >>> u = UDP(dport=1337) &gt...

...t nwl.cc> --- I can't reproduce this issue. Here's what I tried on a current Fedora Rawhide: table inet t { chain c { type filter hook input priority 0; policy accept; ip6 hoplimit 1 icmpv6 type mld-listener-query counter accept } } Then created the packet using scapy: >>> p = IPv6(src='fec0:42::1', dst='fec0:42::5')/ICMPv6MLQuery() >>> ep = Ether(src='fe:54:00:62:0e:9a', dst='52:54:00:62:0e:9a')/p >>> sendp(ep, iface='vnetbr0') Looking at the ruleset, I see the counter increments so the packet...

...Component: ulogd Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org Reporter: farzadazizsoltani98 at gmail.com When I test ulogd, I found that after a while ulogd hasn't "flow.start.sec" and "flow.start.usec" fileds in their JASON file. I send packet with scapy as follows: send(IP(dst='myIP')/fuzz(UDP()),loop=1) log with those fileds: { "ct.event" : 4, "ct.id" : 1864591088, "ct.mark" : 2147483767, "dest_ip" : "192.168.2.100", "dvc" : "Netfilter", "flow.en...

On 03/04/2015 09:45 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > On 03/04/2015 03:37 PM, Oliver Welter wrote: >> Am 04.03.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Dave McGuire: >>> Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: >>>> Please add [DNSBL] support to iptables instead of Dovecot. It's a waste of >>>> effort to code it into every application that listens on the network.

[ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum search] returns a 404. Can the forum search https://www.centos.org/forums/search.php? be used with parameters that will provide the supporting material for the warning "Many CentOS users have had problems after enabling this repo"? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

...2.2.x86_64 rrdtool-1.4.3-2.el5.rf.x86_64 city-fan.org-release-1-12.rhel6.noarch dhcp-4.1.1-43.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64 libmetalink-0.1.2-7.rhel6.x86_64 chkconfig-1.3.49.3-2.el6_4.1.x86_64 gnutls-2.8.5-14.el6_5.x86_64 libcurl-7.41.0-1.0.cf.rhel6.x86_64 yajl-1.0.7-3.el6.x86_64 libICE-1.0.6-1.el6.x86_64 scapy-2.0.0.10-5.el6.noarch gdbm-1.8.0-36.el6.x86_64 lzop-1.02-0.9.rc1.el6.x86_64 libgcrypt-1.4.6-4.2.cf.rhel6.x86_64 libattr-2.4.44-7.el6.x86_64 numad-0.5-11.20140620git.el6.x86_64 libidn-1.30-1.el6.x86_64 libsepol-2.0.41-4.el6.x86_64 libvorbis-1.2.3-4.el6_2.1.x86_64 libidn-devel-1.30-1.el6.x86_64 yum-m...

...city-fan.org-release-1-12.rhel6.noarch > dhcp-4.1.1-43.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64 > libmetalink-0.1.2-7.rhel6.x86_64 > chkconfig-1.3.49.3-2.el6_4.1.x86_64 > gnutls-2.8.5-14.el6_5.x86_64 > libcurl-7.41.0-1.0.cf.rhel6.x86_64 > yajl-1.0.7-3.el6.x86_64 > libICE-1.0.6-1.el6.x86_64 > scapy-2.0.0.10-5.el6.noarch > gdbm-1.8.0-36.el6.x86_64 > lzop-1.02-0.9.rc1.el6.x86_64 > libgcrypt-1.4.6-4.2.cf.rhel6.x86_64 > libattr-2.4.44-7.el6.x86_64 > numad-0.5-11.20140620git.el6.x86_64 > libidn-1.30-1.el6.x86_64 > libsepol-2.0.41-4.el6.x86_64 > libvorbis-1.2.3-4.el6_2.1.x86...

Hi, Two doubts. 1. What I've to replace in "NEEDED"? or I need to just run the whole command you given 2. You mean this one, rpm -qa | grep libguestfs* On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:14:55PM +0530, Thirumalai Nambi wrote: > > Thanks for your update, > > > > I got the