search for: scaleway

Hi, This morning my day began quite badly, since my main production server wasn't responsive anymore. For public hosting I'm using a "Dedibox Pro" server at the french provider Online that's recently been acquired by Scaleway. I'm currently managing half a dozen public servers at that provider, all running CentOS 7. For debugging purposes, Online's web console enables you to boot the machine into a live rescue system, in that case Ubuntu 18.04. Once I managed to connect via SSH to the live system, here's wha...

...C being restored. > I'll update the bug with some more info, but you need to reproduce it > in trunk and in a hardware that I have access to. RPI is just not > relevant enough for me, that I don't even have one. Perhaps I should > buy one... I think you could reproduce this on scaleway.io 's hosted service, which offer a free month, but I'd be happy to provide access to something if that's what it took. As I said though, RPi 2 should be a pretty vanilla Cortex A7 core. Ben. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lis...

...inovak <kikinovak at protonmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > This morning my day began quite badly, since my main production server wasn't responsive anymore. For public hosting I'm using a "Dedibox Pro" server at the french provider Online that's recently been acquired by Scaleway. I'm currently managing half a dozen public servers at that provider, all running CentOS 7. > For debugging purposes, Online's web console enables you to boot the machine into a live rescue system, in that case Ubuntu 18.04. > Once I managed to connect via SSH to the live system, here...

...Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.9p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-copy-id Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter: vlebedev at scaleway.com ssh-copy-id add public key to /etc/dropbear/authorized_keys This is wrong place. As mentionned here: https://linux.die.net/man/8/dropbear The correct place is $HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

...39;s entirely possible that GCC is being lenient where it shouldn't, or that pathscale's libunwind is abusing of some GCC bug, there doesn't exist in Clang. We have seen those by the bucket loads in the kernel, android and other large projects. > I think you could reproduce this on scaleway.io 's hosted service, which > offer a free month, but I'd be happy to provide access to something if > that's what it took. As I said though, RPi 2 should be a pretty vanilla > Cortex A7 core. Right, so that's the other missing piece of information. One that you are extrem...

...he diagram I provided may be a little misleading, so I have attached a new diagram (also available here: https://i.imgur.com/X3nFMCz.png ). I think I also need to provide some more detail about my scenario here: These physical nodes are provided to me by "bare-metal cloud" providers like Scaleway / OVH / Packet.net / etc. I have opted to use Ubuntu on each bare-metal server, but I am also well-versed in RHEL/CentOS environments, so if you want to help me out by telling me CentOS-specific details, I'm sure that I can "translate" that to an Ubuntu/Debian setup. Considering my sc...

On 29 July 2015 at 20:14, Mason Wheeler <masonwheeler at yahoo.com> wrote: > Well, yes, an unwinding expert *was* who I was really hoping to hear from. But > if I understand correctly, you're saying that rather than seeing the values Ben > reported, the sample code crashes on you on both compilers? I do notice that > you're using different versions of both compilers

> From: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > > > On 29 July 2015 at 16:53, Mason Wheeler <masonwheeler at yahoo.com> wrote: > > A couple weeks ago, Ben Pye, a developer working on the ARM32 stuff, found > > and reported a bug related to incorrect generation of stack unwinding info. > > ( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24146 ) Apparently it

Hello Libvirt Users, I would like to setup a two node bare-metal cluster. I need to guidance on the network configuration. I have attached a small diagram, the same diagram can be seen here: https://i.imgur.com/SOk6a6G.png I would like to configure the following details: - Each node has a DHCP enabled guest network where VMs will run. (eg, *192.168.1.0/24 <http://192.168.1.0/24>* for

On 8/02/2018 4:45 AM, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > After seeing command history, I could see that you have 3 nodes, and > firstly you are peer probing 51.15.90.60? and 163.172.151.120 from? > 51.15.77.14 > So here itself you have 3 node cluster, after all this you are going > on node 2 and again peer probing 51.15.77.14. > ?Ideally it should work, with above steps, but due to some