Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "sc1696".
Did you mean:
1696
2018 Aug 11
2
Need help in understanding llvm optimization
I am sorry to not make my question clear. My question is how this value is
calculated without having fadd and fsub in IR?
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Neither 1e16 or 1e16+1 can be accurately represented in a double. The
> largest integer than be accurately represented is 2^53. As the number gets
> larger floating sacrifices