search for: sbs2008

...way, do I need different computer names for each boot mode? > > > > THX --Mark > > > > > > To answer number 1. Yes it's normal. It's working as intended. > > -- > -James > OK, if you say so. I'll not worry about it. I could have sworn the old SBS2008 DC removed the computer. --Mark

...t; >>> THX --Mark > >>> > >>> > >> To answer number 1. Yes it's normal. It's working as intended. > >> > >> -- > >> -James > >> > > OK, if you say so. I'll not worry about it. I could have sworn the old SBS2008 DC removed the computer. > > > > --Mark > > > > I never used a SBS so don't know if it differs from a 2008 or 2012 > server. I Assume they all work the same. When you remove the workstation > it should disable the workstation account. You can confirm by using RSA...

Hello all, I'm currently investigating the option to completely replace a SBS2003 DC with a Samba4 DC. My research (mostly on samba.org guides) shows that it is feasible, however I'd like to get feedback from the community on my goals. Current status: A Windows SBS 2003 is the PDC and a W2008 R2 server is acting as secondary DC. Domain operational level is 2003. There are ~40-50

Anastasios, I've done exactly what you want to do, only starting from SBS2008. Our office went down this road in 2014 when we investigated upgrading from SBS2008 only to find that MS replacement, Server Essentials, did not support Exchange. We currently have a "no cloud" policy, so going to Office 365, as you have done, was not an option (and btw, have you not co...

...he Windows protocol, and the code in this case thinks it's not > supported. GET_TGT (GETCHGREQ_V10) should be supported in Windows Server > 2008 R2 onwards - what version of Windows are you running? Well based on your explanation above this problem makes perfect sense. The existing DC is sbs2008 which is running 2008 SP2. I guess I need to remember that anything older then 2008 R2 needs to start with 4.7 until there is a better solution. > Rowland's idea of joining a 4.7 DC (and then doing a 'drs replicate > --full-sync'), then joining a 4.8 DC to the 4.7 DC should work....

On 26/07/16 21:43, Mark Foley wrote: > Well, ladies and gentlemen -- it's now working! Sendmail *is* authenticating with the > nsswitch.conf settings (winbind added): > > passwd: compat winbind > shadow: compat winbind > group: compat winbind > > and with the AD user REMOVED from /etc/passwd. All is well. I did nothing, no patching of >

I am running Samba4 version 4.2.12 as our office AD/DC. Two questions on domain member computers: 1) When I un-join a Windows 7 workstation from the domain (Start > Computer > Properties > Advanced > Computer Name > Change > Member of: Workgroup), it does not remove that computer from the list of domain computer. I have to either use samba-tool or (Windows)RAS Users and

...ter names for each boot mode? >>> >>> THX --Mark >>> >>> >> To answer number 1. Yes it's normal. It's working as intended. >> >> -- >> -James >> > OK, if you say so. I'll not worry about it. I could have sworn the old SBS2008 DC removed the computer. > > --Mark > I never used a SBS so don't know if it differs from a 2008 or 2012 server. I Assume they all work the same. When you remove the workstation it should disable the workstation account. You can confirm by using RSAT and seeing the disable icon att...

...rk >>>>> >>>>> >>>> To answer number 1. Yes it's normal. It's working as intended. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -James >>>> >>> OK, if you say so. I'll not worry about it. I could have sworn the old SBS2008 DC removed the computer. >>> >>> --Mark >>> >> I never used a SBS so don't know if it differs from a 2008 or 2012 >> server. I Assume they all work the same. When you remove the workstation >> it should disable the workstation account. You can confir...

...than a year and a half with WIN7 workstations in user offices and a couple of experimental Linux domain member workstations. We've never had a hiccup, never lost a file that I'm aware of and have had zero problems with Samba4 doing all this -- which is more than I can say for good 'ole SBS2008 in its day. All that said to demonstrate that we've been using Samba4 for supposedly "not recommended" purposes in a real production environment for quite a while. Furthermore, outfits like Zentyal must be doing the same. So, to repeat the main question: Why is Samba4 not recommen...

...tially Windows Server 2008 x64) in an HVM domain. The install starts OK, but when I get to the disk part of the installation it doesn''t detect the disk I have configured. What is the trick for getting the installer to recognise my disk? Here''s my config file: name = "06-sbs2008" memory = 4096 vcpus = 1 builder = "hvm" kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" boot = "d" device_model = "/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm" vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1" ] disk = [ "phy:/dev/sdd,hda,w" ] disk = [ "phy:/dev/loop0,hdc:...

On Thu, 2018-06-21 at 18:46 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:02:41 -0400 (EDT) > Tom Diehl via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to join a self compiled samba 4.8.2 DC to an existing > > Windows domain using > >

...ld be about the most common environment there is; especially > > now that > > Small Business Server is no longer sold and Server Essentials does not > > support > > Exchange. What are all the SBS/Exchange/Outlook small businesses doing? > > Limping > > along with SBS2008/11, or putting their email in Outlook.com? Seems like > > the > > Samba4/dovecot/Outlook combo would be an ideal migration. > > > > I appreciate your help. > > > >> Quoting Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org>: > >> > >> More info ... >...

...onment with lots of Windows workstations running Outlook would be about the most common environment there is; especially now that Small Business Server is no longer sold and Server Essentials does not support Exchange. What are all the SBS/Exchange/Outlook small businesses doing? Limping along with SBS2008/11, or putting their email in Outlook.com? Seems like the Samba4/dovecot/Outlook combo would be an ideal migration. I appreciate your help. > > Quoting Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org>: > > > More info ... > > > > My dovecot error log shows: > > > > Se...

...> running > Outlook would be about the most common environment there is; especially > now that > Small Business Server is no longer sold and Server Essentials does not > support > Exchange. What are all the SBS/Exchange/Outlook small businesses doing? > Limping > along with SBS2008/11, or putting their email in Outlook.com? Seems like > the > Samba4/dovecot/Outlook combo would be an ideal migration. > > I appreciate your help. > >> Quoting Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org>: >> >> More info ... >> >> My dovecot error log shows:...

...onment with lots of Windows workstations running Outlook would be about the most common environment there is; especially now that Small Business Server is no longer sold and Server Essentials does not support Exchange. What are all the SBS/Exchange/Outlook small businesses doing? Limping along with SBS2008/11, or putting their email in Outlook.com? Seems like the Samba4/dovecot/Outlook combo would be an ideal migration. I appreciate your help. > > Quoting Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org>: > > > More info ... > > > > My dovecot error log shows: > > > > Se...

More info ... My dovecot error log shows: Sep 05 16:45:19 auth: Debug: client in: AUTH 1 NTLM service=imap Sep 05 16:45:19 auth: Debug: client passdb out: OK 1 user=mark at hprs original_user=mark at HPRS Sep 05 16:45:19 auth: Debug: master in: REQUEST 998899713 10219 1 f56352c207cb8f6dea4d264b2c0f8dc1 session_pid=10220 request_auth_token Sep 05