Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "sb_enc_stack".
Did you mean:
nb_enc_stack
2005 Jun 06
1
Bug from revision 9316: SB_ENC_STACK misdefined
Revision 9316 introduced SB_ENC_STACK and friends, but misdefines
SB_ENC_STACK to be too small, resulting in quite noticable artifacts in
wideband mode as well as memory corruption and a crash (sooner or later).
The patch below should return SB_ENC_STACK to be equal to what it
replaced.
Index: sb_celp.c
===========================...
2006 Jan 01
2
Experimental psycho-acoustic model
Happy new year all!
I have had a few issues with this sort of stuff- you could adjust NB_ENC_STACK
or SB_ENC_STACK (which ever you may be fiddling with) and see if the problem
goes away- could be the allocation for the vorbis psy tables takes up more
space than
the current stack size allows (not sure how allocated? Could be your
settings for
supporting alloca/etc. are set different than jm, due to support fo...
2006 Jan 02
0
Experimental psycho-acoustic model
...an
off-by-one overflow on the heap. Maybe that was the error and your
debugger is just reporting a wrong offset. Could you try what's in the
current svn (you were using svn already, right)?
Jean-Marc
> I have had a few issues with this sort of stuff- you could adjust NB_ENC_STACK
> or SB_ENC_STACK (which ever you may be fiddling with) and see if the problem
> goes away- could be the allocation for the vorbis psy tables takes up more
> space than
> the current stack size allows (not sure how allocated? Could be your
> settings for
> supporting alloca/etc. are set different t...
2005 Dec 31
3
Experimental psycho-acoustic model
> When enabling and compiling this with mingw on Win32, my debugger
> complains about heap overruns when calling speex_encoder_destroy(). This
> could be a mingw issue though, as I also found a stackalignment bug which
> prevents me from _USING_SSE (apparantly -mpreferred-stack-size is just
> "prefered" and therefore ignored... *Sigh*).
Just so I understand, the
2005 May 25
3
Speex on TI C6x, Problem with TI C5x Patch
>> There is a bit of work remaining to get the memory usage down for a
>> multichannel application. There have been some good posts over the
>> last couple of months about reducing memory usage.
>
> I think 1.1.8 incorporates all memory reductions proposed. Let me know
> otherwise.
For the persistent storage, the only change that I have made is to
MAX_CHARS_PER_FRAME,