search for: sawar

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "sawar".

Did you mean: saar
2007 Jan 22
5
LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl''s.
...ad will be full and download almost empty? I believe this situation can happen due to fact that load balancing is based on flows and for example p2p or smpt/pop3 will eat whole upload. If my problem isn''t clear I''ll try to explain it better later. Thanks in advance. Pozdrawiam sawar ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolne adresy pocztowe @interia.eu >>> http://link.interia.pl/f19e8
2006 Mar 28
1
IP route balance problem
Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| |...
2007 Nov 12
18
How to fight with encrypted p2p
Hi I believe that whole question is in topic. Is there any way to recognize ( and then shape ) p2p traffic which is encrypted? Modern p2p clients have this ability moreover some of them have this enabled by default. Now I''m using ipp2p for iptables but as I know this doesn''t recognize encrypted traffic. Thanks in advance. Pozdrawiam Szymon Turkiewicz
2006 Mar 28
13
Load-banancing. two ip''s from one isp
--------------eth0---80.48.56.70---------- -------------80.48.56.65 ISP | my | router1 | | | linux | | | router2 ------------eth1---192.168.200.10----- ----------------192.168.1.1 ISP I''ve two ip from my isp one public and one internal. ISP have two routers router1 is gw for public ip and router2 is gw for internal
2006 Oct 04
5
Intel or AMD is better processor for router (800+ users)
Hi I would like to ask you which processor is beter solution for router? Please shortly explain why? I have about 800 users. For each I create 2 htb classes and 4 filters. Moreower router have dhcp serwer and lots of iptables rules. I''m interested in P4 3Ghz HT and AMD Athlon 64 3000+. What is beter choice for my needs? What parametrs of processors are important: clock, cache, fsb
2006 May 13
4
Simple routing question from networking newbie
I''ve recently got a new modem. In fact, it''s a modem-router with NAT functionality. Before I had a plain modem-modem, and I was able to access my workstation from my remote server using the IP address assigned to me by my ISP. Now however, that IP address only reaches the modem-router and the IP address of my workstation is set by my modem-router to 192.168.0.2 How can I
2006 Mar 29
3
Re: Load-banancing. two ip''s from one isp - solution
hi for those who was fallowing this topic I can say that IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED must be disabled! After few tests I''m quite sure that this was cousing my problems. Now I''m using 2.5.15 kernel without patch of Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working. lartc split-access how to and http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt now both are working fine Now I will try to use fwmark
2007 Oct 12
0
Weird problem with maximum upload speed on Windows
Witam, I had very big problem since last Friday. I noticed that clients with Windows can''t upload faster than ~140kB/s at one connection ( ftp http). It''s quite weird because when I do exactly the same test (the same server, time, computer, client ip address, even switch and port) but on Linux upload speed is much bigger. Very interesting is that this is always something about
2006 Aug 23
3
How to select Skype traffic??
Hi, I have simple question about Skype. What are the methods of selecting packets which belongs to Skype?? I know about 7layer but I don''t belive that is only way. Is 7layer realy good and stable solution for routers which must handle more than 1000 users ? Thanks in advance Pozdrawiam Szymon Turkiewicz
2006 Mar 31
0
rule fwmark desn''t work for local packets (output chain)
Witam wszystkich After few days with yours help I''ve succeeded with setup of load-balancing. Now I have problem with next step. I want to mark some packets and than put them to the one of the routing tables to force them going via only one interface with only one ip. Easy?? Ofcourse, but not for me :(. I''m NOT using NAT. Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 71 packets, 24227