search for: save_ifs

...# Existing files will *not* be overwritten unless `-c' is specified. # # This shar contains: # length mode name # ------ ---------- ------------------------------------------ # 7088 -rw-r--r-- runif-tst.S # 3646 -rw-r--r-- setseed-ex.S # 1132 -rw-r--r-- ../C-Progs/programs/Runif.c # save_IFS="${IFS}" IFS="${IFS}:" gettext_dir=FAILED locale_dir=FAILED first_param="$1" for dir in $PATH do if test "$gettext_dir" = FAILED && test -f $dir/gettext \ && ($dir/gettext --version >/dev/null 2>&1) then set `$dir/gettex...

...eg) IS_RREG_OUT(reg) + +/* check whether pred is a predicate register */ +#define IS_PRED_IN(pred) \ + ;; \ + (pred) nop 0 \ + ;; + +#define IS_PRED_OUT(pred) \ + ;; \ + cmp.eq pred, p0 = r0, r0 \ + ;; + +#define IS_PRED_CLOB(pred) IS_PRED_OUT(pred) + + +#define DO_SAVE_MIN(__COVER, SAVE_IFS, EXTRA, WORKAROUND) \ + nop 0 +#define MOV_FROM_IFA(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_ITIR(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_ISR(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_IHA(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_IPSR(pred, reg) \ + IS_PRED_IN(pred) \ + IS_RRE...

...eg) IS_RREG_OUT(reg) + +/* check whether pred is a predicate register */ +#define IS_PRED_IN(pred) \ + ;; \ + (pred) nop 0 \ + ;; + +#define IS_PRED_OUT(pred) \ + ;; \ + cmp.eq pred, p0 = r0, r0 \ + ;; + +#define IS_PRED_CLOB(pred) IS_PRED_OUT(pred) + + +#define DO_SAVE_MIN(__COVER, SAVE_IFS, EXTRA, WORKAROUND) \ + nop 0 +#define MOV_FROM_IFA(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_ITIR(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_ISR(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_IHA(reg) \ + IS_RREG_OUT(reg) +#define MOV_FROM_IPSR(pred, reg) \ + IS_PRED_IN(pred) \ + IS_RRE...

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to

Hi. This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 8 which was updated following Tony's review. (Thank you very much, Tony.) This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset is for linux ia64 test branch and depends on some patches for xen common part I'll send separately. To compile, the changesets in x86/xen

Hi. This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 8 which was updated following Tony's review. (Thank you very much, Tony.) This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset is for linux ia64 test branch and depends on some patches for xen common part I'll send separately. To compile, the changesets in x86/xen

This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 9 which is rebased to 2.6.26 This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define related structures. - Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to communicate with Xen

This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 9 which is rebased to 2.6.26 This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define related structures. - Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to communicate with Xen

This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 10 which is rebased to 2.6.27-rc4. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define related structures. - Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to communicate with

This patchset is ia64/xen domU patch take 10 which is rebased to 2.6.27-rc4. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define related structures. - Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to communicate with

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops