Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "sathvikl".
Did you mean:
sathvik
2014 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Any way get debug output of generated assembly from MCJIT without completely redoing CodeGen?
Yeah, that's probably how I'd do it.
Might be useful if you guys want to contribute that as a command line
option Kevin.
-eric
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Kevin Modzelewski <kmod at dropbox.com> wrote:
> We do this in Pyston using a JITEventListener that just disassembles the
> output; it's "it works let's move on"-quality:
>
2014 Jun 21
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Ocaml binding
Dear,
I am actually using llvm ocaml binding to generate LLVM IR code.
Can some one tell me how to use the binding to generate debug informations
if it's possible ?
Many thanks
---
| J. Charles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140621/50464cda/attachment.html>
2014 Sep 17
3
[LLVMdev] Measure execution time of each basic block
Jon,
I need to create a database of basics blocks and their execution time. The
only thing I'm concerned is if a block A is more expensive than a block B.
Do you think that even with the overhead I would be able to get the A > B
information?
Like: overhead + time(A) > overhead + time(B) => A > B.
If so, I'm not too much concerned about the accuracy.
Not sure if I was clear,
2014 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] RDPMC inst use in llvm
I want to measure the performance of a JITed code snippet on MCJIT.
so I was planning to inject the RDPMC inst for the code generated through a
llvm IR builder.
Is there a patch available ? If there's a better way to do it please chime
in.
Thanks
sathvik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2014 May 22
4
[LLVMdev] perf tool support in MCJIT
I believe the perf tool cannot profile/analyze the JITed code in MCJIT
model.
Can you please confirm this ? I was working on a patch to fix this.
Another question, is the there any support to map the llvm IR with x86
generated assembly ? so its easier to analyze the code generator.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: