Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "saparation".
Did you mean:
  aspiration
  
2005 Dec 24
2
Eleven??
I was poking around in the Gentoo Linux repository yesterday, trying to 
satisfy my curiosity about how many programming languages there are in 
"common use" today. I found one called "Eleven" which is quite strangely 
similar in intent to Rails. The home page is 
http://eleven.sourceforge.net/.
Eleven is much simpler than Rails, and there are some interesting ideas 
in it. To
2018 Jan 23
2
[virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP feature bit
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:05:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > As we are using virtio_net to control and manage the VF data path, it is not
> > clear to me
> > what is the advantage of creating a new device rather than extending
> > virtio_net to manage
> > the VF datapath via transparent bond mechanism.
> 
> So that XDP redirect actions can differentiate
2018 Jan 23
2
[virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP feature bit
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:05:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > As we are using virtio_net to control and manage the VF data path, it is not
> > clear to me
> > what is the advantage of creating a new device rather than extending
> > virtio_net to manage
> > the VF datapath via transparent bond mechanism.
> 
> So that XDP redirect actions can differentiate
2018 Jan 23
2
[virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP feature bit
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:47:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:16:23PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:05:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:  
> > > > As we are using virtio_net to control and manage the VF data path, it is not
> > > > clear to me
> > > > what is the advantage of creating a new device
2018 Jan 23
2
[virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP feature bit
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:47:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:16:23PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:05:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:  
> > > > As we are using virtio_net to control and manage the VF data path, it is not
> > > > clear to me
> > > > what is the advantage of creating a new device
2012 Jul 06
0
I changed the separator from . to / and it still seems to work.
Hello,
Just as an experiment I changed the separator from . to / restarted dovecot (v2.1.1).
When adding an existing account with lots of mail folders to thunderbird everything still seems to work. 
My directory layout is like this:
.Info.mailinglists
.Info.mailinglists.Horde
.Info.mailinglists.modperl
.Info.mailinglists.PDNS
.Info.mailinglists.Sogo
.Info.mailinglists.tinc
2018 Jan 23
0
[virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP feature bit
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:16:23PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:05:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > As we are using virtio_net to control and manage the VF data path, it is not
> > > clear to me
> > > what is the advantage of creating a new device rather than extending
> > > virtio_net to manage
> > > the VF datapath
2013 Jan 13
6
[Bug 9560] New: drop-cache option
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560
           Summary: drop-cache option
           Product: rsync
           Version: 3.0.9
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: core
        AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
        ReportedBy: colundrum at gmail.com
         QAContact: rsync-qa at
2018 Jan 23
0
[virtio-dev] [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] virtio_net: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP feature bit
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:13:01PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:47:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:16:23PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 02:05:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:  
> > > > > As we are using virtio_net to control and manage the VF data path, it is not
> > >