Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "sangitachowdhary".
2018 Jan 13
0
Integrating llvm pass with pass manager
Do you pull clang under llvm/tools and compile it as well? In theory, if
`opt` recognize the option, so does `clang -mllvm`.
2018-01-12 8:47 GMT+08:00 sangeeta chowdhary <sangitachowdhary at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried giving this option like this
>
> clang -c -emit-llvm -mllvm -rdetector hello.c -c -o hello.bc
> but I am getting error " Unknown command line argument '-rdetector’.”
>
> Although same option work with opt -
> opt -rdet...
2018 Jan 08
5
Integrating llvm pass with pass manager
Hello,
I have followed steps given in - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693 <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693>, to integrate my pass with pass manager and run it with clang. I am able to run my pass with opt - opt -mypass but when I try to run it with clang, I always get an error -
2018 Jan 15
0
Integrating llvm pass with pass manager
On 14 Jan 2018, at 00:14, sangeeta chowdhary <sangitachowdhary at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have taken SimplePass and added in Transform directory, “libLLVMSimplePass.a” is built but I can not see this pass in opt —help. I don’t even see the name of pass while registering it in the example.
The SimplePass example is intended to be built out of tree, s...
2018 Jan 14
2
Integrating llvm pass with pass manager
I have taken SimplePass and added in Transform directory, “libLLVMSimplePass.a” is built but I can not see this pass in opt —help. I don’t even see the name of pass while registering it in the example.
> On Jan 13, 2018, at 7:35 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 13 Jan 2018, at 03:45, Craig Topper via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
2018 Jan 13
2
Integrating llvm pass with pass manager
...mputer.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:00 PM 陳韋任 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
wrote:
> Do you pull clang under llvm/tools and compile it as well? In theory, if
> `opt` recognize the option, so does `clang -mllvm`.
>
>
> 2018-01-12 8:47 GMT+08:00 sangeeta chowdhary <sangitachowdhary at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have tried giving this option like this
>>
>> clang -c -emit-llvm -mllvm -rdetector hello.c -c -o hello.bc
>> but I am getting error " Unknown command line argument '-rdetector’.”
>>
>> Although same o...
2020 Jun 24
2
Function name demangling in llvm ir
(though, usual caveat: you /usually/ shouldn't be doing that - instead
relying only on whatever semantics the IR actually carries, rather
than implying extra semantics based on the demangled name)
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:48 PM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I have not tried it but maybe
>
> `std::string llvm::demangle(const
2018 Aug 21
4
different output with fast-math flag
This is of course not homework. I am trying to understand how fast math
optimizations work in llvm. When I compared IR for both the programs, the
only thing I have noticed is that fdiv and fmul are replaced with fdiv fast
and fmul fast. Not sure what happens in fdiv fast and fmul fast.
I feel that its because d/max is really small number and fast-math does not
care about small numbers and consider