search for: sando

...ld so I can switch to maintaining it locally. thanks Iain ] On 13 Mar 2015, at 17:04, Rui Ueyama wrote: > Looks like most developers prefer Makefile removal, and there's no push-back. Let's go ahead and remove them. I'll send a patch. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Iain Sandoe <iain at codesourcery.com> wrote: > I have fixed the issue locally, but been out of the office - can apply the fix - or just maintain the makefiles locally if no-one else really wants them, > > fine with whatever the community decision is. > Iain > > On 11 Mar 2015, at 22...

...make or auto-fu, then things tend not to work completely (or as you might expect) :-) ... .. thus I expect we'll need to do some maintenance either way - but that's life! Apologies if I sounded grumpy, Iain > > Thanks, > -Chris > >> On Mar 13, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Iain Sandoe <iain at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >> I fixed the immediate problem - please let me know when you are going to break my build so I can switch to maintaining it locally. >> thanks >> Iain >> ] >> On 13 Mar 2015, at 17:04, Rui Ueyama wrote: >> >...

On Aug 10, 2013, at 6:07 , Iain Sandoe <iain at codesourcery.com> wrote: > >> RELATED PROBLEMS >> 1) addrspacecast support: approved but not implemented yet. It will >> cleanup address spaces conversions localized in a single instruction >> allowing each target to define the semantic... > > Is...

...-Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Y Knight" <jyknight at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Ehsan A Amiri" <amehsan at ca.ibm.com>, "Iain Sandoe" <iain at codesourcery.com> > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 10:37:44 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Removing PowerPC/Darwin Support? > > > The only part I'd like to see *NOT* removed is the darwin PPC asm > format. Not because I care about ppc/darwin, but be...

Hello all .. my first post to this thread (and this list, as it happens).. On 10 Aug 2013, at 07:46, Michele Scandale wrote: > I just want make a quick summary: a summary is indeed useful. > OBJECTIVE: discuss for finding a way to represent logical (derived from > source language abstractions) address space also in the IR to be able to > exploit this information for optimizations.

I have fixed the issue locally, but been out of the office - can apply the fix - or just maintain the makefiles locally if no-one else really wants them, fine with whatever the community decision is. Iain On 11 Mar 2015, at 22:11, Rui Ueyama wrote: > I'd agree, but the Makefiles were added just 9 months ago. I don't know if there's a real need of any kind. Added Iain who added

Hi Gents, For those of us with out-of-tree backends which are not 32bit, the msp430 backend is a useful vehicle for examining changes and testing out ideas. So I was wondering about enabling debug output on the MSP430 backend so that I can illustrate a few issues to Adrian and you on the variable pieces side. (there doesn't appear to be any specific person claiming the msp430 code right

I would still urge folks to consider keeping distinct functionality in separate places. Agreed, it makes more sense for the [language agnostic] unwinder to be in compiler-rt than libcxxabi -- but IMO it makes even more sense for it to be distinct. The bundling of the unwinder with libgcc_s gave us (i.e. 3rd party folks, outside the vendor's organisation) nothing but headaches. Much

Hi everyone!! I have dataset composed of a numbers of survival analyses. ( for batch survival analyses by using for-loop) . Here are code !! ####### dim(svsv) Num_t<-dim(svsv) Num<-Num_t[2] # These are predictors !! names=colnames(svsv) for (i in 1:Num ) { name_tt=names[i] survdiff(Surv(survival.m, survival) ~ names[i], data=svsv) fit.Group<-survfit(Surv(survival.m, survival) ~

Hi! Ive searched the net now for a couple of days, after the answer for this one: How do I enable encrypted passwords in samba so that nt4 sp3+ can access shares? ( I do not have access to the registry on those machines) Im using samba on debian, and I read someplace that youll have to recompile in support for enrypted password. I have put "enrypted passwords = yes" in smb.conf, doesnt

On 30 Jul 2014, at 21:29, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > The ELFv1 ABI is used on 64-bit big-endian Linux and AIX. There's one small difference between the two: with the 64 bit ELFv1/ SVR4 ABI, tail padding for structs passed by value is only performed in case the struct is larger than 8 bytes, while for AIX 64 bit it's always done. As an aside, on Darwin/ppc64 it's done if the

Hi everyone, I don't believe that anyone is currently using (a recent) LLVM on PowerPC/Darwin. As far as I know, Apple stopped supporting PowerPC hardware years ago. There is a significant amount of code in the PowerPC backend dedicated to Darwin support and removing it would make maintaining the rest of the backend easier. If anyone expects upcoming LLVM releases to continue to support

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Iain Sandoe <iain at codesourcery.com> wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > On 31 Jan 2014, at 08:50, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > > Thanks for the great overview. > +1 > ( and +1 for David's comment about moving the unwind stuff into this area) > > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 201...

Chandler, Thanks for the great overview. On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > >> On 30 January 2014 21:50, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>> >>> I don't see any compelling reason to split the

On 1/30/15 1:17 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: > Although this has been discussed in the past, I think that given a few > conversations, it seems that it unfortunately needs to be brought up again. > > There seems to be some disagreement over the ideal location of the > unwinder (libunwind). Currently, libunwind resides in a subdirectory of > libc++abi. There seems to be some

Hi Rafael, On 20 Dec 2013, at 14:30, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > On 20 December 2013 05:39, Daniel Liew <daniel.liew at imperial.ac.uk> wrote: >> Hi Rafael and other LLVM devs, >> >> I'm currently upgrading a project that uses LLVM that links a bitcode >> archive (a C library) with a module. Originally we used >> Linker::LinkInFile() but that was removed

Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with running out of mbuf clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down 1000-4000 connections, but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp 8192 mbuf clusters. I also tried setting maximum amount of mbuf clusters to 65536, but that only made the box hard-wire 86MB of 96MB RAM, making it just as unsuable as a dead machine. Of course, when the