search for: samuraileuma

----- Original Message ---- > From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>; LLVM Developers Mailing List ><llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:39:57 PM > Subject: Re: Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile > > Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com>...

...bug+Asserts mode without complaint with --enable-bindings=none. I suspect this makes something fishy looking with the CMake build. Do you need logfiles from configure? Thanks again, --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 7:27:18 AM > Subject: Re: Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile > > Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > > > The single-threaded b...

...ing, go to definition, etc. As any prototype, editor has some limitations (e.g. no cross-file indexing). If there is any interest to such tool I will improve it a bit and then publish. Also considering llvm asm (ll) editing and build support. Regards, Sergey Yakoushkin 2010/3/16 Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com>: > Hello Sergey, > > I'd be interested in such a plugin.  At one time somebody else started a plugin to cause Eclipse to compile with LLVM-GCC but I hadn't heard anything else from them.  I've been just modifying the commands manually for that.  I have definit...

...rs/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/trunk-build2/bindings/ocaml/llvm/Debug+Asserts/llvm.cmx] Error 2 make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 make[1]: *** [ocaml/.makeall] Error 2 Thanks for helping, --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thu, January 13, 2011 4:49:56 PM > Subject: Re: Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile > > Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > > > [ 73%] Regenerating...

Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > This time the autotools version of LLVM trunk build with Clang trunk compiled in > Debug+Asserts mode without complaint with --enable-bindings=none. I suspect > this makes something fishy looking with the CMake build. Do you need logfiles > from configu...

After waiting through about 2 hours of hard drive spinning for Clang to link under my Xubuntu Lucid Lynx Linux setup on VirtualBox, ld finally just gave up trying to link it. I was using CMake's build scripts on version 2.7 release of LLVM and Clang. The version of ld is (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.20.1-system.20100303. Can anyone confirm this problem? If needed I'll cross-post this to

Hi Mike-M, Thanks for the help. It seems I'll have to just download the precompiled binaries since I only have 1 Gig in the entire system I'm using. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: mike-m <mikem.llvm at gmail.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 3:36:34 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Another bad binutils? > > You will need a 1GB guest. Linking is the biggest memory hog of the entire build > process. I've measured it to require 850MB to 950MB for linking clang on various > 32...

I build llvm+clang almost every day with Ubuntu 10.04. Everything goes fine. I guess it's your VirtualBox has too little memory. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> wrote: > After waiting through about 2 hours of hard drive spinning for Clang to > link under my Xubuntu Lucid Lynx Linux setup on VirtualBox, ld finally just > gave up trying to link it. I was using CMake's build scripts on version 2.7 > release of LLVM and Clan...

Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > The single-threaded build failed the same place as the double threaded build > failed which is the same place I just indicated in my previous post. The > ../llvm/configure script version failed with OCaml building with about 600 > assembler errors since...

Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > I have attached the logfiles here. I think you didn't set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE while configuring the cmake build. On your build directory, please do: make clean cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug path/to/your/llvm/source/root make If that doesn't work, show t...

Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > Here's some of what it would take to make portable bitcodes in C or LLVM Assembly: A look at the work done on ANDF in the 90's may be helpful. I've only skimmed it but there's been some deep thinking about stuff like this....

Forgot to CC the list, sorry. ----- Forwarded Message ----- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:40 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RTTI gone in 3.0? > > Hi FlyLanguage, > > I thought LLVM disabled RTTI a long time ago.  It was just too slow. > > --Sam >...

...get the name on the second pass. Should I just make another StringMap for all of my variable names and declared constants? That seems to me what a symbol table is used for though. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Fri, July 9, 2010 3:03:50 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] ValueSymbolTable's mutators are private? > > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Samuel Crow wrote: > > > Hello, > >...

----- Original Message ---- > From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 5:00:00 PM > Subject: Re: Build problems and workarounds with CMake and XCode > > Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > > [snip] > > &gt...

Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: > [ 73%] Regenerating > /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt.tmp > > [ 73%] Updating > /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt > if necessary... > [ 73%]...

Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> writes: [snip] > I tried making a separate build of LLVM SVN in XCode using build files created > with CMake. Surprisingly, it worked better than Eclipse! The Build_All target > completed its build. The install target was another story though. First of > all,...

----- Original Message ---- > From: Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com>; LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 12:22:55 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] fastcc and ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction() > > > I agree with you Overmind...

[ 73%] Regenerating /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt.tmp [ 73%] Updating /Users/samuraicrow/Documents/workspace/llvm-trunk-build/tools/llvm-config/LibDeps.txt if necessary... [ 73%] Checking for cyclic dependencies between LLVM libraries. find-cycles.pl: Circular dependency between *.a files: find-cycles.pl: libLLVMAsmPrinter.a

> I agree with you OvermindDL1, > > SInce the language I'm going to be working on doesn't support varargs, it would be nice to be able to ditch the C calling convention for fastcc in all occurrances for an added speed boost.  I also will need to add my own library calling convention on one platform I plan on supporting which will be register-loaded as well. Are you going to be

Whoops, phone rang and I forgot to cc to the list before I typed the message. ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 3:38:21 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and >autofoo builds > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >...