Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "samplefdo".
Did you mean:
sampled
2014 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] Recent changes in -gmlt break sample profiling
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Diego,
>
> I think sampleFDO needs to be designed in a way which can protect itself
> from future breakage like this. The roots in the unnecessary dependency of
> sample FDO on gmlt setting. It is totally reasonable to tune debug binary
> size by changes like this.
>
> The right way is to fix this is to introduc...
2014 Oct 24
9
[LLVMdev] Recent changes in -gmlt break sample profiling
On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 6:21:14 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 6:11:21 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at
2016 Aug 12
3
AutoFDO sample profiles v. SelectInst,
I am looking for advice on a problem observed with
-fprofile-sample-use for samples built with the AutoFDO tool
I took the "hmmer" benchmark out of SPEC2006
It is initially compiled
clnag++ -o hmmer -O3 -std=gnu89 -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -fno-strict-aliasing -w -g *.c
This baseline binary runs in about 164.2 seconds as reported by "perf stat"
We build a sample file from this