search for: samba_shares

Hello, I want to access a shared folder on my linux from a windows machine. The smb.conf has this entry ?? [samba_share] ??????? comment = QEMU share place ??????? path = /media/samba_share ??????? valid users = mahmood vb ??????? public = no ??????? writable = yes ??????? printable = no ??????? create mask = 0777 Then I added a user to samba with "smbpasswd mahmood". The folder mask

...hell and home directory winbind nss info = rfc2307 # Enable extended ACL support https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_wi th_Windows_ACLs vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = yes store dos attributes = yes [home] path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/home read only = no admin users = @"PHM\Domain Admins" [Profiles] path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Profiles read only = no admin users = @"PHM\Domain Admins" [Accounts] comment = PHM Accounts path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Accounts admin users = @"PHM\Domain Admins&quot...

I've got a Redhat 5 server running Samba, and two dualboot CentOS 5 workstations. Until we get a better backup strategy, I'm backing up the workstations to the server via mounting a shared samba drive to /mnt. Trying tar cvf /mnt/samba_share/backup.tar /* eventually yields backing up /mnt, which produces an unwanted loop, including /mnt/samba_share I looked at tar with --exclude /mnt

...inbind nss info = rfc2307 > > # Enable extended ACL support https://wiki.samba.org/index. > php/Shares_wi > th_Windows_ACLs > vfs objects = acl_xattr > map acl inherit = yes > store dos attributes = yes > > > [home] > path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/home > read only = no > admin users = @"PHM\Domain Admins" > > [Profiles] > path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Profiles > read only = no > admin users = @"PHM\Domain Admins" > > [Accounts] > comment = PHM Accounts > path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Account...

*Another reply that was accidentally sent to the wrong address...* I ran another test of a share on the raid array after making the changes you suggested Rowland. I reset the ACLs on /mnt/md0/samba_shares/test as outlined in the wiki and set the default group to domain admins. I executed setfacl commands g=rwx and chgrp domain admins, then added the directory to my smb.conf and ran "smbcontrol all reload-config". I then logged in to a Windows box as administrator and set ACLs for my test...

Hi all, I have a quota problem with xfs (xfsprogs 3.1.7+b1 on debian GNU/Linux 7 -- wheezy) and samba-4.1.19. If I set a user quota to say 10GB, windows explorer reports a 20GB quota of which none used. If I change quota to x, windows explorer reports 2x space of which none used. So I assume samba is somehow getting (albeit incomplete and incorrect) xfs quota info from operating system. disks

...created /etc/samba/user.map ls -la /etc/samba/user.map -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73 Sep 21 20:53 /etc/samba/user.map cat /etc/samba/user.map !root = PHM\Administrator PHM\administrator Administrator administrator Here is the output of the getfacl command you requested I run: sudo getfacl /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Accounts getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: mnt/md0/samba_shares/Accounts # owner: itwerks # group: domain\040admins user::rwx group::rwx other::rwx default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:group:domain\040admins:rwx default:mask::rwx default:other::rwx Rega...

Hello, I am not sure if this is a bug or a feature... When I use scp to copy a file to a filesystem which forces or masks permissions on new files (in my case a samba share) the resulting permissions depend on whether the owner had write access in the original permissions. If the owner did have write access then the copied file ends up with the permissions specified by the filesystem. If the

...reating directories and we know that Domain Admins have Full Control I'm skipping those steps from the wiki. Step 5: Create a Share: I added the "Accounts" directory to my smb.conf again: [RAID-Accounts] comment = PHM Accounts Directory on RAID ARRAY path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Accounts read only = no and the executed *sudo smbcontrol all reload-config* *Step 6: Setup share permissions:* I logged in to a Windows 7 workstation that is joined to the domain as user "itwerks", a member of the Domain Admins group with the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege set. I op...

...d via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > *Another reply that was accidentally sent to the wrong address...* > > > > I ran another test of a share on the raid array after making the > > changes you suggested Rowland. I reset the ACLs > > on /mnt/md0/samba_shares/test as outlined in the wiki and set the > > default group to domain admins. I executed setfacl commands g=rwx > > and chgrp domain admins, then added the directory to my smb.conf and > > ran "smbcontrol all reload-config". I then logged in to a Windows > > box a...

...file "a.doc" from the samba share, it remains in the backup server but rsync doesn't put it back on the samba share. The backup server is running the rsync daemon. The command I have been using from the samba share computer. rsync -pavzW --stats user@192.168.1.2::back_up_daemon /samba_shares Thanks -- Mark Busby

...d only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Necessary share for domain controller path = /samba_shares/netlogon admin users = admins [profiles] comment = Share for storing user profiles path = /samba_shares/profiles/ read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700

...6 19:23:05 -0400 Jason Secord via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > *Another reply that was accidentally sent to the wrong address...* > > I ran another test of a share on the raid array after making the > changes you suggested Rowland. I reset the ACLs > on /mnt/md0/samba_shares/test as outlined in the wiki and set the > default group to domain admins. I executed setfacl commands g=rwx > and chgrp domain admins, then added the directory to my smb.conf and > ran "smbcontrol all reload-config". I then logged in to a Windows > box as administrator and...

Hi all, I am experiencing something similar to what Andreas described on march 9th. Since upgrade to samba-4.12.0, users can sometimes have errors on accessing shares. Errors can be different, most often NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION, but also "Invalid handle". Just restarting smbd fixes the issue, for a while. The server serves six shares: one or a few may be locked, the other are

Hi Gurus, Can anybody advise me on how to connect from NT to Samba share which reside on Solaris 2.6. Enclosed with this email is a copy of my smb.conf file. Thanks. [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP comment = "Samba version %v" preexec = csh -c 'echo /var/opt/samba -M %m -I %I' & status = yes browseable = yes guest account = cmsndba admin users = root encrypt

> Message: 26 > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:56:38 -0400 (EDT) > From: Scott Ehrlich <scott at MIT.EDU> > Subject: [CentOS] Help with backups > To: centos at centos.org > Message-ID: > <Pine.GSO.4.64L.0708172056230.29233 at biohazard-cafe.mit.edu> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > I've got a Redhat 5 server running Samba,

...dmins have Full Control I'm skipping those > steps from the wiki. > > Step 5: Create a Share: > > I added the "Accounts" directory to my smb.conf again: > > [RAID-Accounts] > comment = PHM Accounts Directory on RAID ARRAY > path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Accounts > read only = no > > and the executed *sudo smbcontrol all reload-config* > > *Step 6: Setup share permissions:* > > I logged in to a Windows 7 workstation that is joined to the domain > as user "itwerks", a member of the Domain Admins group wit...

...hose > > steps from the wiki. > > > > Step 5: Create a Share: > > > > I added the "Accounts" directory to my smb.conf again: > > > > [RAID-Accounts] > > comment = PHM Accounts Directory on RAID ARRAY > > path = /mnt/md0/samba_shares/Accounts > > read only = no > > > > and the executed *sudo smbcontrol all reload-config* > > > > *Step 6: Setup share permissions:* > > > > I logged in to a Windows 7 workstation that is joined to the domain > > as user "itwerks", a...

I'm setting up a dedicated database server, and since this will be a central service to my various web servers I wanted it to be as secure as possible...so I am leaving SELinux enabled. However I'm having trouble getting Apache to use mod_auth_pam. I also now can't get setroubleshootd working to send me notifications of the denials and provide tips to solve the problem. The Apache

I had this problem and I could not find the solution on Usenet that's why I'm posting - maybe somebody more fortunate won't have to spend hours and hours to fix this. Problem: successfully joined Samba to Windows AD. wbinfo -g and wbinfo -u worked fine, wbinfo -t did not: # wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW