Displaying 20 results from an estimated 78 matches for "samba_servic".
Did you mean:
samba_service
2004 Jan 19
0
W2K AD domain join success, wbinfo -t error - question
Hi all!
I'm configuring Samba 3.0.1 on Solaris 9 (rel s9_58shwpl3) Sparc.
Have successfully installed Ldap libs, Krb5 libs, and, finally - Samba. Trying to join W2KSP4 domain.
net rpc join -S dc01 -U Administrator
Gives
bash-2.05# /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc join -S dc01-tmn -U Administrator
Password:
Joined domain MYDOMAIN.
Now i start winbindd.
The smb.conf file is:
2002 Aug 13
2
WinXP cant connect Samba_Server which can connect WinXP for files sharing
Hi All Folks.
I encountered following problem
WinXP can't connect Samba_Server but Samba_Server can connect WinXP for
files sharing
WinXP box and Samba_Server are connected directly via a crossover cable as
experiment. Firewall of WinXP is off and ipchains on Samba_Server also off.
(Remark: The WinXP box has been tested via direct connection with a
crossover cable to a WinME box/Win98
2020 Jul 30
2
NTP and FreeBSD jails
FreeBSD-12.1p7
Samab-4.10.15 running in FreeBSD Jail
I just wish to ensure that my conclusion respecting Samba, FreeBSD Jails, and
NTP is correct.
1. Unless configured otherwise Windows domain clients will query and obtain
their time from the samba_server DC.
2. Samba_server obtains its time from the OS, in this case a FreeBSD Jail.
3. FreeBSD Jails get their time from their host.
4. If
2000 Jan 07
1
Problems with the 2.0.6 release ....
Hello,
we are trying to upgrade from 2.0.5a to 2.0.6 (under Digital Unix and
Windows 95 clients). After the upgrade we get a lot of errors like
these:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Log <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Jan 4 16:18:35 fissio smbd[31799]: [2000/01/04 16:18:35, 0]
smbd/service.c:make
2020 Jul 31
1
NTP and FreeBSD jails
On Thu, July 30, 2020 17:23, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 7/30/20 5:00 PM, James B. Byrne via samba wrote:
>> FreeBSD-12.1p7
>> Samab-4.10.15 running in FreeBSD Jail
>>
>>
>> I just wish to ensure that my conclusion respecting Samba, FreeBSD Jails, and
>> NTP is correct.
>>
>> 1. Unless configured otherwise Windows domain clients will query and
2017 Feb 16
0
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
Hi Brian,
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:20:46 -0800, brian lamb via samba wrote:
> Configured as you mention, and prior with the other tweaks I had in the first place, Im getting the same results, which is "FSUTIL utility requires a Local NTFS Volume", and mapping it.
Hmm, this works fine for me against a Samba 4.4.2 Btrfs backed Samba
share.
smb.conf:
[global]
...
store dos
2014 Sep 18
0
Member server only shares locally
Hello
In 2 different subnets I have setup 2 identical samba servers (RH 6.5) as
fileservers for windows clients. Each is a member of it's own AD Domain
(Windows 2003 Servers).
The problem: one of them only is accessible and sharing locally.
On the windows-client, trying to mount a share gives this error:
C:\Users\testuser>net use y: \\samba_server\topfolder /user:testuser
System
2020 Jun 09
1
Samba410 AD DC samba_server initial startup log messages
Now I am down to discovering the meaning of these entries in:
/var/log/samba4/smbd.log:
[2020/06/09 09:04:54.269011, 1] ../../source3/lib/messages.c:899(send_all_fn)
send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 57458 failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
[2020/06/09 09:04:54.269680, 1] ../../source3/lib/messages.c:899(send_all_fn)
send_all_fn: messaging_send_buf to 57477 failed:
2005 Apr 22
1
Samba as a PDC with LDAP and Kerberos
I've been searching and researching this and I can't seem to find the
answers I'm looking for. I'd like to setup a Samba PDC that Windows
clients will join. The PDC will use an LDAP backend to get authorization
information (username, home directory, etc). The authentication portion
is handled by an MIT Kerberos KDC. I think I'm real close to having it
all together but I'm
2002 Oct 21
2
W2KSP2 vs W2KSP2RP1 - failed logon to Samba 2.2.6
Hello, samba.
I upgraded samba 2.2.5 to samba 2.2.6 in Debian 3.0. Both versions was
built myself by script "rules binary".
Before:
Our network have a few of W2KSP2.rus and a few of W2KSP2RP1.rus. All
workstations can logon to samba 2.2.5.
After:
W2KSP2.rus can't login to samba 2.2.6, though W2KSP2RP1.rus still can
logon to PDC on samba 2.2.6. W2KSP2 tells me, that it can not find
2020 May 05
1
Samba-4.10.13 IPv6 turn it off
I am working on a FreeBSD jail (12.1p4) using samba410. I have joined this
service to our existing Samab DC DOMAIN using samba-tool domain join. This
worked as far as I can tell.
I have these entries in smb4.conf
# BOF
# Global parameters
[global]
netbios name = SAMBA-02
realm = BROCKLEY-2016.HARTE-LYNE.CA
server role = active directory domain controller
workgroup = BROCKLEY-2016
2020 Jul 13
3
DC replications of FreeBSD samba-4.10.15
On Mon, July 13, 2020 10:23, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 2020-07-13 15:06, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>>> Just out of curiosity, are you also using vfs_zfsacl?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> But only on DC1, AFAICT!
> I see no mention of it on DC2's smb.conf.
> That could be the reason why you have two different behaviour.
>
> bye
> av.
>
That appears to
2017 Feb 16
4
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
Hi David,
Configured as you mention, and prior with the other tweaks I had in the first place, Im getting the same results, which is "FSUTIL utility requires a Local NTFS Volume", and mapping it.
I then went to contig, `contig -n X:\share\sparesefile 0`, as well as a few other size. Maybe im using it wrong, but some testing on contig has only "Access is denied" when I try
2011 Feb 16
3
I can't connect to a Samba resource
Dear, I'll appreciate your help because I can't connect to a samba
resource. Here are the details:
Samba Server: Centos 5.5 with samba and samba-common packages
Content of smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = somisa
server string = Test server
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
2020 Jul 23
2
samba-tool domain backup offline stalls
On Wed, July 22, 2020 14:48, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 22/07/2020 19:40, James B. Byrne via samba wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, July 22, 2020 12:35, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>> FreeBSD-12.1p7 jail running Samba-4.10.15 on ZFS.
>>>
>>> When I run 'samba-tool domain backup offline targetdir=/tmp' I see this:
>>>
>>> running backup on dirs:
2005 Jan 24
3
changing ldap passwords?
Samba experts,
I am using Samba 3.0.8 on an AIX 5.1 system with ldap authentication. I
have ldap working so that users can authenticate in their samba account via
ldap. However, I am trying to figure out the best method for allowing
users to change their ldap samba account password.
What is the best method to allow end users to change their LM/NT
passwords for Samba via LDAP?
Should
2024 Aug 12
1
winbindd fails to start
Rowland Penny rpenny at samba.org
Fri Aug 9 15:25:00 UTC 2024
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:40:18 -0400
"James B. Byrne via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>> I am testing samba-4.19 on FreeBSd-14.1 and am getting this error in
>> the log.wb-<DOMAIN> file:
>>
>> ../../source3/winbindd/winbindd_dual.c:1965(winbindd_sig_term_handler)
>>
>>
2020 Jul 23
3
samba-tool domain backup offline stalls
On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:50, Rowland penny wrote:
> Port 137 should only be used by Samba nmb, so has nmbd somehow
> been started ?
No. The error is not caused by anything else listening on 137.
[root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# netstat -an | grep -i listen
tcp4 0 0 192.168.18.162.22 *.* LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 192.168.216.162.22 *.*
2020 Jul 08
6
How to delete an unwanted NS record
On Wed, July 8, 2020 04:23, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 08:50, Mani Wieser via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 07.07.2020 22:14, Mani Wieser via samba wrote:
>> Found it (while having my morning walk with the dog): same as with
>> SOA: this is a zone/domain thing and not record
>>
>> Usage: samba-tool dns delete <server> <zone> <name>
2017 Feb 22
1
(DeviceIoControl, FSCTL_SET_SPARSE)
For some reason It's not erroring now, I will look into it more, but I suspect it鈥檚 the settings, the last thing mentioned
David
> [globa]l section is fine, as long as it's not also set in the share section.
So, yeah, that may have fixed im for the time being not getting the sparse errors, for the first time in 4 months, however, there is a couple other problems, so hopefully they