search for: samba_internal

Dear all, I have a few question regarding to DNS and upgrading from Samba 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. After reading about the Badlock Bug, I feel the urge to upgrade my Samba installation and to move from BIND9_FLATFILE to SAMBA_INTERNAL_DNS. I am using Samba version 4.1.17. During provisioning (some years ago) I have decided to use BIND9_FLATFILE. At this moment I would like to upgrade to Samba 4.4.2 and I would like to migrate to SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS. I have noticed the command "samba_upgradedns" but unfortunately I cou...

I had configured Samba AD's with Bind9_DLZ in all DC. But for some reason (i couldn't determine) three (sambadc02,03,04) AD's responded very slowly . So change to Samba_Internal backend into the servers with problem and works fine. sambadc01 -> with FSMO roles - Bind9_DLZ sambadc02 -> Samba_Internal sambadc03 -> Samba_Internal sambadc04 -> Samba_Internal My question is: ?The DNS backend can be different between Ad's? ?can affect the performance? Saludos....

> > > Join command was: > samba-tool domain join domain.com DC -k yes --server=vm-dc1.domain.com --dns-backend > SAMBA_INTERNAL -v -d 5 2>&1 | tee join.txt Here, you have "--dns-backend SAMBA_INTERNAL" where perhaps you meant "--dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL" ? I'm guessing that it was interpreted as "--dns-backend=NONE" Kris Lou klou at themusiclink.net On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at...

...t;bind interfaces only=yes" Usage: samba-tool domain provision [options] root at server-linux:~# samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [TESTARGUS123.COM]: TESTARGUS123.COM Domain [TESTARGUS123]: TESTARGUS123 Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: dc DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [192.168.200.1]: 8.8.8.8 Administrator password: Retype password: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - Provisioni...

...two Samba AD DC on each side of the VPN, one forest, one domain, one site, two subnets. Note that this target configuration is not yet operational since I'm trying to make the DSN names resolution work first through the VPN. The DNS servers are Samba internal DNS servers. During the provision, SAMBA_INTERNAL was chosen. +---------------------------+ | SUBNET: 192.168.1.0/24 +---------------------------+ | SAMBA AD DC DNS server 1 +---------------------------+ | DOMAIN: company.elmts +---------------------------+ | hostname_1_1 | hostname_1_2 | ... | hostname_1_N1 +---------------------------+ | | | VP...

...er WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE or "TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure" > On 13/03/2020 16:04, Kris Lou via samba wrote: >>> >>> Join command was: >>> samba-tool domain join domain.com DC -k yes --server=vm-dc1.domain.com --dns-backend >>> SAMBA_INTERNAL -v -d 5 2>&1 | tee join.txt >> >> Here, you have "--dns-backend SAMBA_INTERNAL" where perhaps you meant >> "--dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL" ? >> >> I'm guessing that it was interpreted as "--dns-backend=NONE" >> >> &...

...samba version, because i've een reports the 4.8 fails and 4.7 fails but 4.6 should work, and i dont know about 4.9.2 Can you show your /etc/hosts file and /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/krb5.conf You used : samba-tool domain join mydomain.com DC -U"MYDOMAIN\administrator" --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --option="interfaces=ens2f0" not wrong, but can you try. kinit Administrator samba-tool domain join mydomain.com DC --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --site=MySite --option="interfaces=ens2f0" -k If that does not work. samba-tool domain join mydomain.com DC --dns-backend=SAMBA_I...

On 5/4/2016 5:02 AM, David STIEVENARD wrote: > Hi > > first project with samba, first post on this mailing list and, > actually, first time using a mailing list ever ;-) > > > > In summary > ========================================== > I try to install samba in a test VMs, everything seems fine but when > windows client joins the domain it doesn't register in

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:11:17 +0100 Sina Owolabi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi List! > > Im trying to switch from using the samba internal dns to bind. > Im running a self-compiled samba 4.7.1 pair of DCs on Centos 7.2. > > After following the steps in the wiki, named refuses to start with > this error: > > ● named.service - Berkeley Internet

Hi, I see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Internal_DNS_Back_End#Limitations The internal DNS does not support: * acting as a caching resolver * recursive queries * shared-key transaction signature (TSIG) * stub zones * zone transfers * Round Robin load balancing among DC's but this was relevant for 2018-2019. What limitations rem...

I keep seeing different approaches/recommendations as to which DNS services to utilize for an AD controller... what are your recommendations, and why? Thanks very much. -- Jefferson K Davis Technology and Information Systems Manager Standard School District 1200 North Chester Ave Bakersfield, CA 93308 661.392.2110 ext 120 (office) http://district.standard.k12.ca.us District

Hello. which are the main differences between Samba_Internal and BIND9_DLZ ? I refer to the differences about functionality such as zone transfers and automatic updates. Which others functionalities offers BIND9, that Samba_Internal doesn't support ? Is it possible to use a DNS Server (Bind9) separate of the DC Samba4? I mean, in other server. Than...

In short: BIND9_DLZ to avoid issues. Regarding your issue with internal DNS and client updates, I don't know if Windows client rely on DNS I would check SOA record of root zone to verify it is set up correctly (ie it is aiming a valid DC, up and well running) with: dig -t SOA your.domain.tld (on linux) nslookup -type=soa your.domain.tld (on windows) You must receive a reply. The reply must

Hello guys, It is possible to work with the "dns-backend = SAMBA_INTERNAL" in Samba4 NT4 style? I followed the link below, but there was some errors. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend Errors: *# samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL* *lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf* *params.c:pm_process() - Processing co...

...se of the support for newer SMB protocol versions. But when I call samba-tool without --use-ntvfs option I got the following: root at openindiana:~# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain provision Realm: domain.local Domain [domain]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [134.102.20.20]: none Administrator password: Retype password: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: guess...

Dear samab developer, Im getting the below error while using samba-tool domain provision and others like dbcheck and time, [root at emad-srv1 bin]# ./samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm: EMAD.HC Domain [EMAD]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: BIND9_DLZ Administrator password: Retype password: INFO 2019-03-31 19:02:33,254 pid:17520 /usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py #2079: Looking up IPv4 addresses WARNING 2019-03-31 19:02:33,255 pid:17520 /usr/l...

Hello, I need help you to understand my error. I have juste generate samba ad with the following command samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm:? SAMBADOM.CALAIS.FR Domain [SAMBADOM]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]:? dc DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]:? SAMBA_INTERNAL DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]: Administrator password: Retype password: I want first test my samba server . when i execute /usr/sbin/samba -i? I have the following err...

...revert back as I ran out of time (and energy) to do all the remaining housekeeping tasks. Plus I didn't specify the dns-backend or use-rfc2307. Some things that are not clear to me regarding the DC join of a much newer version to an older one: If dns-backend is not specified does it default to SAMBA_INTERNAL? Can the new DC use SAMBA_INTERNAL while the old uses BIND9_DLZ? Does the new joined DC use its native updated schema or is the schema identical to the old DC? Is the "hot-backup of the /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb" necessary if one is planning on removing the old DC as soon as the...

...domain "FILE.DUCK" provisioning runns, but I got the error What I am doing wrong? root at file:~# rm /etc/samba/smb.conf root at file:~# samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [DUCK]:  Domain [DUCK]:  Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]:  DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]:  DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [192.168.1.254]: Administrator password: Retype password: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: guess_name...

Hallo, We have Samba4 (Sernet, Version4.1) on a Debian Wheezy server. There we try to use our Infoblox (It is our primary and secondary DNS server) as an external DNS server for the active directory on the samba4 server. It doesn?t matter which setup option (Samba_internal, bind_dlz, none) we use it doesn?t work. Harry