Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "samba4bkp".
2019 Aug 08
0
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
On 07/08/2019 23:17, Igor Sousa via samba wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description:
>
> - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6
Ouch, using seriously old and EOL Samba versions is not a good idea. I
would suggest you upgrade at regular intervals.
> on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS;
> - I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and as D...
2019 Aug 13
1
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
On 13/08/2019 21:28, Igor Sousa wrote:
> I've found divergences when I've compared the dns entries on 'king'
> and 'samba4' servers ('samba4' has the fsmo roles on 'SMB' domain).
> There are some 'samba4bkp' entries on 'king' and theses same entries
> there aren't on 'samba4'. I've understood that I've could to demoting
> 'samba4bkp' using samba-tool, but master DC 'samba4's version is 4.1.6
> and this options there isn't on this version....
2019 Aug 12
2
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
Em seg, 12 de ago de 2019 ?s 14:36, Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu:
> > OOOOOPPPPSSSS
> >
> > You have compiled Samba yourself, so samba_dnsupdate will not be in
> > /usr/sbin, it will be in /usr/local/samba/sbin
> >
> > so change the line in smb.conf to:
> >
> > dns update command =
2019 Aug 07
2
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
Hello everybody,
I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description:
- There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6
on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS;
- I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and as DC
to *SMB *domain with BIND9 DNS Back End;
- *king* has updated dns zones and I've checked it;
- *king *has got resolve...
2019 Aug 13
0
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
I've found divergences when I've compared the dns entries on 'king' and
'samba4' servers ('samba4' has the fsmo roles on 'SMB' domain). There are
some 'samba4bkp' entries on 'king' and theses same entries there aren't on
'samba4'. I've understood that I've could to demoting 'samba4bkp' using
samba-tool, but master DC 'samba4's version is 4.1.6 and this options there
isn't on this version. Is possible to fo...
2019 Aug 09
2
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu:
> > What a lot of work you didn't need to do, 'samba-tool domain demote
> --remove-other-dead-server=samba4bkp' would have done it for you ;-)
>
Good to know it. I'll tried if I face the same problem.
Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu:
> > Is 'king' using itself for its nameserver ?
> >
> > It looks l...
2019 Aug 09
0
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
...or Sousa wrote:
> Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> escreveu:
>
> > What a lot of work you didn't need to do, 'samba-tool domain demote
> --remove-other-dead-server=samba4bkp' would have done it for you ;-)
>
> Good to know it. I'll tried if I face the same problem.
>
> Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> escreveu:
>
> > Is 'king'...