search for: samba43

On Tue, February 7, 2017 14:29, Alnis Morics wrote: > May I ask an off-topic question? > > James, does saying "samba43" mean you installed this FreeBSD port or > package? Which is known to crash during provisioning as DC. Did you > find the solution to that issue? > Samba43 was installed on FreeBSD-10.3 as a binary package using the pkg utility. Other than ignorance I had no problems with provisioni...

On Wed, February 8, 2017 10:40, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Samba43 was installed on FreeBSD-10.3 as a binary package using the > pkg utility. Other than ignorance I had no problems with provisioning > a Domain with it. On the other hand Samba44 could not be successfully > provisioned at the time I was setting Samba up which is why we went > with Samb...

...-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Juan Garcia [mailto:juan at ish.com.au] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016 13:47 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] Samba43 ACL's issues Hi there, I'm having trouble with permissions and ACL's running samba43. I want to be able to set permissions on a folder to an specific user. I'm having a similar issue reported here https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-July/156965.html However my error mess...

Hi there, I'm having trouble with permissions and ACL's running samba43. I want to be able to set permissions on a folder to an specific user. I'm having a similar issue reported here https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-July/156965.html However my error message is slightly different: When I set the permission on an specific user by creating a new folder...

Hello. Forgive me, but I'm quite new to AD and I've been searching the web for a couple of days, but found nothing relevant... What's exaclty the NSUPDATE option of this port? Is it intended to work with BIND (like the other two in that group)? What are its requirements? Any reference to a tutorial or any other documentation on how to use it? bye & Thanks av.

On 03/05/16 14:15, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Forgive me, but I'm quite new to AD and I've been searching the web > for a couple of days, but found nothing relevant... > > What's exaclty the NSUPDATE option of this port? Don't use freebsd, but Samba 4, when run as an AD DC, uses nsupdate to update a computers DNS records in AD. > Is it intended to

On 04/05/16 19:07, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 05/03/16 22:55, Rowland penny wrote: > >> Don't use freebsd, but Samba 4, when run as an AD DC, uses nsupdate to >> update a computers DNS records in AD. > > First off, thanks for answering. > > Alas, I don't really understand what you mean... > > Is it used to dynamically add A records for clients that

On 04/05/16 20:06, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 05/04/16 20:23, Rowland penny wrote: > > (I understand this might be specific to FreeBSD, but I asked on its > mailing list and got no answer...) > > > > > >>> Then why is it an option *in alternative* to BIND? >> >> What do you mean '*in alternative*' ?? > > I mean when I build Samba

On 05/04/16 21:28, Rowland penny wrote: >> Choosing NSUPDATE brings in another port/package, named samba-nsupdate >> and described as "nsupdate utility with GSS-TSIG support", which >> installs "/usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate". > > Is this a BSD thing ? I have heard of the python script 'samba-dnsupdate'. My understanding is that it's a

On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 13:06 -0500, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: > Recently we have been having a lot of trouble with time > synchronisation between our samba DC and the domain clients.  We are > not sure what started this issue since the Samba domain went live on > October 11, 2016 and the issues only began to surface this past > January but at some point the time on the clients

On Tue, February 7, 2017 13:15, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Have you also set mssntp in the restrict line for your clients? > > This is required to make it talk to the socket. > > I hope this helps, > > Andrew Bartlett I regret to say that I do not know what that means. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data

On Tue, February 7, 2017 13:06, James B. Byrne wrote: > In any case, we have resolved most of these issues. In dealing with > this I ran across > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation which contains > this instruction: > > Set up the ntpd.conf File on a DC > . . . > ntpsigndsocket /usr/local/samba/var/lib/ntp_signd/ > > Now, on the FreeBSD host I

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 20:17:11 -0500 "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > > Does this mean that I have missed a step in provisioning? Or does it > mean there is a defect in the packaging for FreeBSD? > I am wondering if you have actually fully provisioned. I have tried to provision samba44 and, for some reason, it will not run the provision command

...ller at tropenklinik.de > www.tropenklinik.de > www.bauen-sie-mit.tropenklinik.de > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Juan Garcia [mailto:juan at ish.com.au] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016 13:47 > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: [Samba] Samba43 ACL's issues > > Hi there, > > I'm having trouble with permissions and ACL's running samba43. > > I want to be able to set permissions on a folder to an specific user. > > I'm having a similar issue reported here https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-Jul...

On 22/03/16 05:24, Juan Garcia wrote: > Hi There, > > I have an odd issue with my samba4 infrastructure, I have two servers > both replicating fine. > DC1 passes all tests documented here: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller > Except the following test: > > # kinit administrator > # kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Client

On 05/04/16 20:23, Rowland penny wrote: (I understand this might be specific to FreeBSD, but I asked on its mailing list and got no answer...) >> Then why is it an option *in alternative* to BIND? > > What do you mean '*in alternative*' ?? I mean when I build Samba port, I can choose NSUPDATE *or* BIND99 *or* BIN910 (where "or" means "exclusive or",

On 05/03/16 22:55, Rowland penny wrote: > Don't use freebsd, but Samba 4, when run as an AD DC, uses nsupdate to > update a computers DNS records in AD. First off, thanks for answering. Alas, I don't really understand what you mean... Is it used to dynamically add A records for clients that connect to the AD? >> Is it intended to work with BIND (like the other two in

Hi, Try to add "rdns = false" in krb5.conf on SERVER1. 2016-06-21 13:36 GMT+02:00 Juan Garcia <juan at ish.com.au>: > Hi There, > > I have an odd issue with my samba4 infrastructure, I have two servers both > replicating fine. > DC1 passes all tests documented here: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller > Except

...oningError: Your filesystem or build does not > > > support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires. Try the mounting the > > > filesystem with the 'acl' option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To provision/upgrade the domain I had to install samba43 which > > > > worked first time, however I had to specify --use-ntvfs to > > > > classicupgrade. I am unsure if this has caused any issues, but > > > > as domain controllers they seem to work find, etc. > > > > > > Well, yes it will work, but nt...

Recently we have been having a lot of trouble with time synchronisation between our samba DC and the domain clients. We are not sure what started this issue since the Samba domain went live on October 11, 2016 and the issues only began to surface this past January but at some point the time on the clients and the DC diverged enough that we began to get strange network errors. Once we figured out