search for: samba3.6

In some tests of moving from samba3.5 to samba3.6 I find that the netapp filer don't recognize the groups of the users. Anybody knows where is the problem? Thanks. -- ------------------------- Alejandro Escanero Blanco Servicio de Inform?tica Sistemas - GISI Tel: 671 569 262 (769262) Edificio Empresarial Aljarafe, mod. 36 41940 Tomares (Sevilla)

Hello. I'm trying to update their samba3.6 to the new version. Use the instructions https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/samba-tool/domain/classicupgrade/HOWTO Just use the latest build of sernet. My samba3.6 work is not in the role AD, and as a standart file server with LDAP Backend, which stores users and groups. I'm trying to take advantage of the update utility. But getting

On 23/06/15 10:35, Florentin Richard wrote: > Hi i'm actually trying to migrate my samba 3.6 PDC NT-4 domain with openldap as backend to samba4 AD type domain witch bind_dlz > > so i followed the documentation https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Classic_Upgrade_%28NT4-style_domain_to_AD%29 > the command : > samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/root/sambe/

We are running Arch Linux as a new sever and only has samba4 available officially I am trying to migrate my samba 3 config to work with samba 4 I currently use samba to authenticate windows users to use our Linux shares using the unix groups as the valid users. Here is the problem. I can see the shares using samba 4 but it uses the "Domain users" group to write to the shares and not

Hi i'm actually trying to migrate my samba 3.6 PDC NT-4 domain with openldap as backend to samba4 AD type domain witch bind_dlz so i followed the documentation https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Classic_Upgrade_%28NT4-style_domain_to_AD%29 the command : samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/root/sambe/ --use-xattrs=yes --realm=mydom.local --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ

We are running Arch Linux as a new sever and only has samba4 available officially I am trying to migrate my samba 3 config to work with samba 4 I currently use samba to authenticate windows users to use our Linux shares. Then using the Unix groups setup in NIS to validate the users access to a particular share. Here is the problem. I can see the shares using samba 4 but it uses the

I'm triing to put some samba3.6 server like print server, the load of ntprinters and ntdrivers is ok, but when I try to do a backup of the registry I find it: #net rpc registry export 'HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Print\Environments\Windows NT x86\Drivers\Version-3\Canon iR2270/iR2870 PCL6' printers.reg Violaci?n de segmento (Segmentation Fault) Export fail but enumerate

Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: >bloatware means unsecure, uncomfortable webinterfaces with limited >functionality compared what iptables alone offers you with some knowledge > all that embedded crap is for people which needs handholding and have > fun to own a dozen of halfbaken devices instead just one real box It seems you still have some

ta ocorrendo um problema na instala??o do samba3.6 no Freebsd na release 8.2errro: make: don't know how to make intall. Stop# make clean===> Cleaning for libgcrypt-1.5.0===> Cleaning for cups-client-1.5.0# make install===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found===> License LGPL21 accepted by the user===> Found saved configuration for cups-client-1.5.0===>

Jeremy Allison <jra <at> samba.org> writes: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:16:36AM +0000, Andy Walsh wrote: > > > > Also keep in mind that samba3.6 was successfully adopted on any device that > > had a usb2.0 port in the past. So slapping a usbstick/sdcard/hdd on a cheap > > router is already a common scenario. > > Yes, and I'd like to help

Dear Team, I am trying to use this option on RHEL-6.9(samba3.6) version while accessing samba shares, but its not working?? Is this kernel specific or package specific also? setup is something as this: *[RHEL 6.9]** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** [windows-client]** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **

Hi... With samba4 I sometimes feel like a bloody beginner even I use samba since ages. Miracle of the day: Users connecting using samba4 cannot write to group writeable folders even they should be able to. I upgraded one 3.6 fileserver to 4.2.3. PDC is always a samba 4.2.3 instance. I am using samba4 in classic PDC mode for a couple of reasons. On my fileserver I have a folder called

** hello folks, all started with searching for an MS exchange server connector to fetch my office my by Thunderbord on my private machine. So far I used Davmaill (OWA) but I'm not that satisfied, so I found OpenChange but that needs Samba4 installed on my NAS. So I was checking the Samba wiki and mailing archive but I'm bit confused. There are several version available, plus franky, what

4.11 - But am hoping it will be broadly backported On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Draxter <admin at draxter.me> wrote: > Thanks Steve. > > > That's great news. Pretty recent commit. Which kernel version (onward) is > it in? > > > Regards, > > Draxter. > > > On 01/04/17 00:49, Steve French wrote: > > Kernel cifs supports encryption!! (Thank

Thanks Steve for Quick response!! *My question is*: => Accessing encrypted shares fully depends on kernel fix (as you provided), If no? => How can we use /etc/samba/smb.conf "smb encrypt = mandatory" parameter to access encrypted shares? Because using this parameter I am not able to access samba-shares either from windows/RHEL client Thanks Amit On 04/03/2017 11:48 AM,

On 12/03/16 11:16, Andy Walsh wrote: > Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes: > > >> bloatware means unsecure, uncomfortable webinterfaces with limited >> functionality compared what iptables alone offers you with some knowledge >> all that embedded crap is for people which needs handholding and have >> fun to own a dozen of halfbaken

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:19:13PM +0000, Andy Walsh wrote: > Jeremy Allison <jra <at> samba.org> writes: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:16:36AM +0000, Andy Walsh wrote: > > > > > > Also keep in mind that samba3.6 was successfully adopted on any device that > > > had a usb2.0 port in the past. So slapping a usbstick/sdcard/hdd on a

Hello, I am looking to check out the performance impact of vfs commit for different threshold values. I downloaded samba3.6 for RHEL6 (http://www.enterprisesamba.org/samba-packages/red-hats-rhel/rhel-6/) and added the following settings in the smb.conf: * vfs objects = commit * commit:dthresh = 4K Irrespective of dthresh value (4K, 64K, 512K) I don't see any performance

Really sorry to re-post but it looks like my thread has been buried and had no responses. I am using samba3.6 winbind to connect a RHEL5.8 linux box to a new Windows Server 2012 Active Directory which has Unix Identity Mapping installed. So I have all the uidNumber/gidNumber stuff in the windows schema. I am able to log in but I am not getting the right uid/gid. My AD uids start at around 800.

CIFS or SMB3 mount (vers=3.0)? I doubt that RHEL has backported the encryption feature in the kernel client yet, but would be a good question for RHEL support. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:15 AM, amit kumar <amitkuma at redhat.com> wrote: > Dear Team, > I am trying to use this option on RHEL-6.9(samba3.6) version while > accessing samba shares, but its not working?? > Is this