search for: samaccountname

...winbind use default domain = yes >> >> 9999 start range is "Domain's user" GidNumber. To have a default >> primary group. >> Shared uid and gid starts with 10000. >> >> The test for groups : >> -------------- >> # net ads search '(SamAccountName=info2)' samaccountname gidnumber -P >> Got 1 replies >> >> sAMAccountName: info2 >> gidNumber: 10002 >> ------------------ >> # getent group info2 >> info2:x:10002: >> ------------------ >> All is OK >> >> >> >> For...

...iles is not a dfs root. get_referred_path: |home| in dfs path \fileserver.mydomain.lan\home is not a dfs root. My test users have uidNumbers und gidNumbers defined. I found this nifty command to list them root at fileserver:/var/log/samba# net ads search '(|(uidNumber=*)(gidNumber=*))' sAMAccountName uidNumber gidNumber -P Got 15 replies sAMAccountName: Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers gidNumber: 10005 sAMAccountName: Administrator uidNumber: 10000 gidNumber: 10000 sAMAccountName: Enterprise Admins gidNumber: 10004 sAMAccountName: workgroup-1 gidNumber: 10010 sAMAccountName: Users g...

...winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind use default domain = yes 9999 start range is "Domain's user" GidNumber. To have a default primary group. Shared uid and gid starts with 10000. The test for groups : -------------- # net ads search '(SamAccountName=info2)' samaccountname gidnumber -P Got 1 replies sAMAccountName: info2 gidNumber: 10002 ------------------ # getent group info2 info2:x:10002: ------------------ All is OK For the User, it is not working as expected : ------------- # net ads search '(SamAccountName=b.btstest)' s...

...me it successfully imported the users. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [20-05-15 00:40:42] 3288 rndb_ads_utils.c:176 info: ADS CMD::ldap search open: LANG=C net -P ads search \(objectClass=group\) sAMAccountName objectSid distinguishedName [20-05-15 00:40:43] 3288 rndb_account.c:1425 info: 111 domain groups found [20-05-15 00:40:43] 3288 rndb_account.c:1470 debug: sAMAccountName=Incoming Forest Trust Builders sid=S-1-5-32-557 is not domain object. domain sid is S-1-5-21-940051827-2291820289-3341758437...

Thank you both precisions : ) My users have no "@" in their names (samAccountName nor userPrincipalName nor anything) except in mail attribute). >From https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679635%28v=vs.85%29.aspx which I read before initial post I understand AD can have this limitation of 20 chars if and only if you decide to support (so) old clients (that we should st...

...red_path: |home| in dfs path \fileserver.mydomain.lan\home > is not a dfs root. > > My test users have uidNumbers und gidNumbers defined. I found this > nifty command to list them > > root at fileserver:/var/log/samba# net ads search > '(|(uidNumber=*)(gidNumber=*))' sAMAccountName uidNumber gidNumber -P > Got 15 replies > > sAMAccountName: Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers > gidNumber: 10005 > > sAMAccountName: Administrator > uidNumber: 10000 > gidNumber: 10000 > > sAMAccountName: Enterprise Admins > gidNumber: 10004 > > sAMA...

...es >>> >>> 9999 start range is "Domain's user" GidNumber. To have a default >>> primary group. >>> Shared uid and gid starts with 10000. >>> >>> The test for groups : >>> -------------- >>> # net ads search '(SamAccountName=info2)' samaccountname gidnumber -P >>> Got 1 replies >>> >>> sAMAccountName: info2 >>> gidNumber: 10002 >>> ------------------ >>> # getent group info2 >>> info2:x:10002: >>> ------------------ >>> All is OK &gt...

Thank you again Rowland for precision : ) In userPrincipalName there is a "@". It is forged with cn at ad.domain.tld and cn is forged with firstname.sn, as samAccountName, which often is longer than 20 chars. I'll change that... Thank you again all, have a nice day! mathias 2015-07-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 01/07/15 17:44, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> Thank you both precisions : ) >> &gt...

...cot/on2it-ldap-users-userdb.cfg driver = ldap } valid_chroot_dirs = /var/mail/on2it $ cat /usr/local/etc/dovecot/on2it-ldap-users.cfg hosts = dc2.office.on2it.net ldap_version = 3 base = dc=office,dc=on2it,dc=net scope=subtree auth_bind = yes dn = [suppressed] dnpass = [suppressed] pass_attrs = sAMAccountName=user user_attrs = \ =home=/var/mail/on2it/%{ldap:sAMAccountName}, \ =mail=maildir:/var/mail/on2it/%{ldap:sAMAccountName} user_filter = (&(ObjectClass=person)(sAMAccountName=%u)) pass_filter = (&(ObjectClass=person)(sAMAccountName=%u)) iterate_attrs = sAMAccountName=user iterate_filter =...

Hello all, I've been trying to use a Samba3 fileserver with security = ADS in a domain where the DC is Samba4. It all seems to work, except for users with long names. What happens is that users can log in to the domain with their userPrincipalName as well as the sAMAccountName. Unfortunately, if the username is longer than 20 characters (which, because of our username = first_name.last_name policy, is the case for a few users), then the userPrincipalName and the sAMAccountName differ. So when users that have logged in using their userPrincipalName try to access a sha...

...> 9999 start range is "Domain's user" GidNumber. To have a default >>>> primary group. >>>> Shared uid and gid starts with 10000. >>>> >>>> The test for groups : >>>> -------------- >>>> # net ads search '(SamAccountName=info2)' samaccountname gidnumber -P >>>> Got 1 replies >>>> >>>> sAMAccountName: info2 >>>> gidNumber: 10002 >>>> ------------------ >>>> # getent group info2 >>>> info2:x:10002: >>>> -------------...

Reading here i've understod that for LDAP query it is better to use SAMAccountName as 'login', but today i've found: https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/windows/desktop/ADSchema/a-samaccountname so, 'SAMAccountName' is a compatibility field with NT mode, limited to 20 chars. Someone here use 21 chars logins? ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key...

...dows DC:s. Is it possible to configure the new (4.11.4->) Samba to behave like 4.9.4 used to, because the current behavior is not consistent with the Windows DC:s and breaks this OU check? It is not apparent to me why the behavior has changed - surely the same criteria for uniqueness of the sAMAccountName etc have existed in 4.9.4, yet it chose to not return results outside the search base. Regards, -P On 2020-01-31 17:08, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 31/01/2020 13:50, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed the following problem with records returned out...

Hai Marco, What i did mean. You can have 255 chars in total with these limitation's Windows NT 4.0, Windows 95, Windows 98, and LAN Manager : 20 = sAMAccountName Windows 2000 and up : 256 chars = sAMAccountName at alias.domain.tld ( full distinguished name ) The SAM-Account-Name attribute (also known as the pre?Windows 2000 user logon name) is limited to 256 characters in the Active Directory schema. However, for backward compatibility the limit is 20...

...ening to the LDAP ports and is serving me the answer to my query? This problem does not only happen when the LDAP database is searched using ldapsearch, it happens also using other tools that connect to the LDAP ports. I still don't fully grasp what this has to do with the uniqueness of the sAMAccountNames - they are unique throughout my directory and I don't expect them to be otherwise. I also don't get why it is fine for the LDAP port to respond to queries in a different manner than ldbsearch? Ldbsearch honors the basedn, but the LDAP port does not. Furthermore, it seems that this is n...

...uth default { passdb ldap { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap-pass.conf } userdb ldap { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf } ... } plugin { quota = maildir:User quota #quota_rule = *:storage=2M // tried with and without this line } dovecot-ldap.conf: ... user_attrs = sAMAccountName=mail=maildir:/var/vmail/%$/Maildir, quotaMail=quota_rule=*:storage=%$ user_filter = (&(objectClass=person)(|(mail=%u)(sAMAccountName=%u))) pass_attrs = sAMAaccountName=user,userPassword=password pass_filter = (&(objectClass=person)(sAMAaccountName=%u)) Quotas are set by the quotaMail in...

...ail plugin: sieve: ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir: ~/sieve sieve_storage: ~/sieve Further, here is my dovecot-ldap.conf: hosts = delldb.sau24.org:3268 base = dc=sau24, dc=org ldap_version = 3 dn = cn=Mail User,cn=Users,dc=sau24,dc=org dnpass = secret auth_bind = yes scope = subtree user_attrs = sAMAccountName=home=/home/vmail/%$,=uid=501,=gid=501 pass_attrs = sAMAccountName=user user_filter = (&(objectclass=person)(|(sAMAccountName=%n)(mail=%n at sau24.org)(otherMailbox=%n at sau24.org))) pass_filter = (&(objectclass=person)(|(sAMAccountName=%n)(mail=%n at sau24.org)(othermailbox=%n at sau24.org...

On 01/07/15 17:44, mathias dufresne wrote: > Thank you both precisions : ) > > My users have no "@" in their names (samAccountName nor userPrincipalName > nor anything) except in mail attribute). What have you got in userPrincipalName ? > > From https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679635%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > which I read before initial post I understand AD can have this limitation > of 20 chars if and o...

...any of the > filters rely on. Interestingly, I've now found that (on my current DCs, running 4.18.5), ldbsearch *does* seem to return the expected result, but the same query via ldapsearch does not. dc2$ sudo ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb "(&(objectCategory=Person)(sAMAccountName=*)(memberOf:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:=CN=somegroup,OU= someou,DC=mydomain,DC=org))" samAccountName # Record 1 [...] # record 39 dn: CN=A User,OU=Users,OU=someou,DC=mydomain,DC=org sAMAccountName: auser # Referral [...] # returned 42 records # 39 entries # 3 referrals whereas no results are r...

On 5/16/2020 5:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/05/2020 19:52, James Atwell via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> ??????? I upgraded two DC's to 4.12.2 from 4.11.6 before I noticed >> authentication issues with a couple Netgear ReadyNAS we have. For >> reference I have a total of 6 DC's with 4 running 4.11.6 and two now >> running 4.12.2.?