search for: sagowitz

...olume = Private writable = yes comment = Private Share valid users = %S browseable = no create mode = 0764 directory mode = 0775 [general] path = /shares/general writeable = yes public = yes valid users = @users,@root,root force group = users force create mode = 764 Brad Sagowitz Operating Systems Specialist III A+, MCP, Linux+, CCAI-UNIX 1125 E. Alameda Norman, OK 73071 brad@jdmc.org

Hi: I want to upgrade a Fedora Core 1 Linux machine that is running Samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. Initially, I compiled the 3.0.2a source, with defaults, and installed. The installation resides in /usr/local/samba. Can I download the 3.0.5 source, compile and install without breaking anything? Will the configuration be broken? Does anyone know a way to do this cleanly? Anyone's help is

Hello recently I set up XFS share under samba , and played from Win2K with ACL entries of shared files, and noticed that Win2K never DENY ACL entries , so for example for a XFS file with acl: # owner: a user::r-- group::rwx other::rwx Win2K security tab shows for user "a": Read & exec = <nothing here> Read = Allowed Write = <nothing

Wondering if anyone can help. Here is my situation, I have a RH 7.3 machine running a compiled from source rpm version of samba 2.2.7. We have been a win98se (which works great) shop for sometime but are migrating to XP Pro machines slowly. I can get the XP machine to join the domain (and the machine account is created in both the /etc/passwd and /etc/samba/smbpasswd file) but when I reboot and

I've posted this before but had to leave town and wasn't able to follow up... I'm still having this problem. Here is what is in the logs when I try and log in. [2004/07/14 07:58:02, 0] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(863) authorise_login: rejected invalid user nobody Original Message: Wondering if anyone can help. Here is my situation, I have a RH 7.3 machine running a compiled