Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "safesvao".
Did you mean:
safesvaos
2011 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Language Reference Strictness
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Shea Levy <shea at shealevy.com> wrote:
>. The
> (probably impossible) end-goals to this project would be a) that every
> program which passes its checks would be as safe to run in kernel mode
> with full memory access as it would be in user mode
That would be a very useful thing to have for embedded systems. Some
such as uCLinux run ports of
2011 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Extend llvm to fix global addresses
On Dec 6, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Peter Cooper wrote:
> The best case i can think of is embedded developers needing to layout functions or globals in memory.
> Currently they would have to resort to a linker script or assembly hacks for this.
This proposal also requires extending object file formats and linkers,
and this impacts a lot of people, so it would want a pretty
compelling
2011 Oct 20
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM Language Reference Strictness
On 10/19/11 11:58 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Shea Levy<shea at shealevy.com> wrote:
>> 2. Are target-specific behaviors documented for each supported target?
> When anything has target-specific behavior, that fact should be
> documented. Beyond that, if you have a question about what some
> construct is supposed to do, please ask.
What I