search for: safestate

Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello all, > > In your view, what is the most reliable and safe way to increase an LV > housing the root filesystem of a Centos 6 VM. I am thinking either growing > the virtual HD virtual device, or creating a new device and adding it as a > PV to the VM, or perhaps migrating the whole FS to a new virtual disk. > > Any input on how best to proceed

Boris Epstein wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:57 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Boris Epstein wrote: > > >> > In your view, what is the most reliable and safe way to increase an LV >> > housing the root filesystem of a Centos 6 VM. I am thinking either >> > growing the virtual HD virtual device, or creating a new device and >>

> > > Ok, that *is* small. I'd worry about a logfile suddenly growing massively, > and freezing your system. (Yes, it has happened here, and then there was > the time a summer student ran something, wouldn't be back until Monday... > and got a 20G logfile, which blew out the NFS-mounted home directory fs, > on which a number of other people resided... including *me*,

.. what is? fellow centosians. how to you mount your loopback targets? I'm trying lvm backstore, I was hoping I would do it with uuid, but it's exposed more than once and how would kernel decide which device to use I don't know. thanks

nobody does use iscsi loopback over an lvm? On 05/02/16 17:36, lejeczek wrote: > .. what is? > fellow centosians. > > how to you mount your loopback targets? > I'm trying lvm backstore, I was hoping I would do it with > uuid, but it's exposed more than once and how would kernel > decide which device to use I don't know. > > thanks >

On 2/11/2016 5:14 AM, lejeczek wrote: > nobody does use iscsi loopback over an lvm? I'm not sure what 'iscsi loopback' even means. iSCSI is used to mount a virtual block device hosted on another system (initiator mode) or to share a virtual block device (target mode), while loopback is used to mount a local file as a device, such as an .iso image of an optical disc. can you

On 11/02/16 20:20, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/11/2016 5:14 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> nobody does use iscsi loopback over an lvm? > > I'm not sure what 'iscsi loopback' even means. iSCSI is > used to mount a virtual block device hosted on another > system (initiator mode) or to share a virtual block device > (target mode), while loopback is used to mount a

dear list. this question is rather related to samba, although not exclusively. I consider it related enough to ask here, please apologise if you don't. we are in the process of setting up a samba domain at my company. a goal is to replace our current nt4 servers. another goal is to provide an easy way to access the documents on the lan (and peoples home directories) from 'outside'

I raised the questions below a couple of months ago by sending it to the developers mailing list, but I don't know if it got through since no one replied to it. Looking at the [R] distribution, the UseMethod() is used in the following way: alias <- function(object, ...) UseMethod("alias") or barplot <- function(height, ...) UseMethod("barplot") What I

Hello all, In your view, what is the most reliable and safe way to increase an LV housing the root filesystem of a Centos 6 VM. I am thinking either growing the virtual HD virtual device, or creating a new device and adding it as a PV to the VM, or perhaps migrating the whole FS to a new virtual disk. Any input on how best to proceed would be appreciated. Cheers, Boris.

On 29/05/20 11:27 pm, mj wrote: > Thanks to all who participated in the interesting discussion. > > It seems my initial thought might have been best after all, and > discontinuing port 143 might be the safest way proceed. Yes and no. Some of the attack vectors mentioned are not reasonable and it really depends on the client. Thunderbird, for example, used to have settings for

Greetings, everybody I've browsed around a bit, but there seems to be no single practical list of this kind. What would you do to make a new Centos server which must run apache, IMAP (Dovecot) and SMTP (PostFix) and nothing else for a few domains as secure from attacks as possible, using only standard RPM packages as much as possible? (Please note that choice of other IMAP and SMTP servers

Once upon a time, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> said: > The cluster software and any hosted services aren't running. It's not > that they think they're wrong, they just have no existing state so they > won't try to touch anything without first ensuring it is safe to do so. Well, I was being short; what I meant was, in HA, if you aren't known to be right, you are

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:57 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Boris Epstein wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > In your view, what is the most reliable and safe way to increase an LV > > housing the root filesystem of a Centos 6 VM. I am thinking either > growing > > the virtual HD virtual device, or creating a new device and adding it as > a > > PV

I initially thought this is "documented behaviour". ?sprintf says: Numeric variables with __exactly integer__ values will be coerced to integer. (emphasis mine). Turns out this only works when the first value is numeric and not NA, as shown by the following example: > sprintf("%d", as.numeric(c(NA,1))) Error in sprintf("%d", as.numeric(c(NA, 1))) : invalid

I''m using the One-click 1.8.7rc2 Ruby Windows installer, everything has been working fine up till now, when i want to start getting into testing, i got this error, any reason why? C:/Ruby/bin/ruby -Ilib;test "C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/ lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/unit/word_test.rb" C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/erb.rb:469:in `scan'': You have a

https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/issues/2171 The fix was easy, it's just surprising to see the behavior change almost on a whim. Just wanted to point it out in case this is unknown behavior, but Evan seems to have found this as well. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Michael Chirico <michaelchirico4 at gmail.com > wrote: > Astute observation. And of course we should be

I am currently running Dovecot on DoD production email server (Postfix) and the latest version the software available from Redhat is dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4. According to you guys, this is ancient and I was wondering what is the safest and easiest way to get my version updated without breaking it... Thanks for any help and or points in the right direction... [root at mail ~]# dovecot -n Usage:

>>x <- c(1, 2, NA) >>is.constant(x) > > [1] TRUE > > For data such as c(1, 1, 1, NA), I should think the safest answer should be > NA, because one really doesn't know whether that last number is 1 or not. > > Andy > My version is is.constant <- function(x) { if (is.numeric(x) & !any(is.na(x))) identical(min(x), max(x)) else FALSE }

Hi, What's the best/safest way to "cat" the following job into crontab? */3 * * * * /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_megaraid_passive.sh > /dev/null 2>&1 I am used to doing this manually via crontab -e, but now I simply have too many centos servers to build in a given week (get to toss another 120K at some more 2U chenbro/tyan/amd64's -w000ooo). -karlski