search for: sacrileg

...'s in co-lo 3 hours away. Plus, until now, I don't think anyone knew Icecast may be effected by this stuff. Hunter > From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 10:23:33 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Sacrilege, but... > > Glibcs are identical. Is this redhat? Mandrake? > > What version of Redhat (that's my guess from the package names :) > > i have RH7.0 with glibcs of 2.2.2-10 > > You guys _do_ install errata right? > > jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http...

...system: Linux 2.2.19 glibc-2.1.3-15 glib-1.2.6-3 glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 (I think pretty close to Mike's). Hunter > From: Mike Prudence <mjp@filmsat59.com> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 18:15:51 +0100 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Sacrilege, but... > > Only remaining irritation is ices desire to just go away after a while with > this error.... > > Warning: Encountered error while transfering > /usr/local/icecast/mp3/mjp01/trk8.mp3. [Libshout reported send error: > Libshout socket error.] > Libshout communica...

...1-88-99-88 ------------------------------------------- $ To understand the program, you have to become both the machine and the program $ ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Prudence <mjp@filmsat59.com> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 3:51 AM Subject: [icecast] Sacrilege, but... > Hi all, > > I'm afraid that having spent yet another entire day floundering around in > the world of icecast, I've really now got to the point of asking a > difficult question. > > I set up an icecast server back in early 1999, and it seemed to work fine &gt...

On Tuesday, 24 July 2001 at 23:51, Mike Prudence wrote: > I've reached the end of my very, very long tether, and not being an > afficionado of the online mp3 streaming scene, I'd just like to know:- > > - icecast is the open source equivalent of something. > - can I pay some money and get the non-open source version of that > something that will run on my Linux box and

On Tuesday, 24 July 2001 at 19:38, Dale Ghent wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Brendan Cully wrote: > > | you can get the not-open-source version free from shoutcast.com. Your > | symptoms imply that you may be trying to stream high-bitrate MP3s? > | (that would be 160kbit+). For starters, try setting sleep_ratio to 0 > | in icecast.conf. Although it burns more CPU it may save you

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Brendan Cully wrote: | which patch exactly is that? I looked into Mark's patch and it seems | to be unsafe (try setting up a client which reads much too slowly and | see if it bogs down all the other clients). I may have misapplied it | or applied it to the wrong version of icecast though, or you could be | talking about a different patch. This one... it probably is the

Hi Brendan, Thanks for your quick reply! >you can get the not-open-source version free from shoutcast.com. I'll purloin that today and see if it makes any difference..... > Your >symptoms imply that you may be trying to stream high-bitrate MP3s? >(that would be 160kbit+). Bzzzzt - nope, sorry, a 128Kbps stream. Another experiement for today is to go down to say 24Kbps and

> Linux 2.2.19 > glibc-2.1.3-15 > glib-1.2.6-3 > glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 Glibcs are identical. Is this redhat? Mandrake? What version of Redhat (that's my guess from the package names :) i have RH7.0 with glibcs of 2.2.2-10 You guys _do_ install errata right? jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To

On Wednesday, 25 July 2001 at 10:23, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > Linux 2.2.19 > > glibc-2.1.3-15 > > glib-1.2.6-3 > > glibc-devel-2.1.3-15 > > Glibcs are identical. Is this redhat? Mandrake? > > What version of Redhat (that's my guess from the package names :) > > i have RH7.0 with glibcs of 2.2.2-10 > > You guys _do_ install errata right? >

Hi all, >It looks like there's a legitimate hard-to-find bug in there somewhere, >but on the bright side, icecast 2 seems to have _none_ of these >problems. We might try all reporing our glibc versions, OS versions and >vendors, and system load while broadcasting to see if there are any >obvious similarities. Well, just for the record... Linux 2.2.16-3 #1 Mon Jun 19 18:49:25

On Wednesday, 25 July 2001 at 18:15, Mike Prudence wrote: > I've had a bit of trouble locating some of the other tools mentioned > briefly (hampered by the lack of search facility on the mailing list > archives). What are people using in general to feed playlists to ices ?? it's got a pretty straightforward scripting interface. I use a python script which gets tracks out of

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Brendan Cully wrote: | you can get the not-open-source version free from shoutcast.com. Your | symptoms imply that you may be trying to stream high-bitrate MP3s? | (that would be 160kbit+). For starters, try setting sleep_ratio to 0 | in icecast.conf. Although it burns more CPU it may save you some | grief. Alternatively you could try checking out icecast from CVS, | although

> I consider icecast as a testing application server. You just cant deploy it > all of a sudden becuse it needs a lot of work still and the UI needs to be > friendlier. Lets wait till the top programmers come up with a central I don't know why there's lots of problems lately. I assume some small libc implementation changed that icecast must have depended on. I ran icecast on 4

Hi all, I'm afraid that having spent yet another entire day floundering around in the world of icecast, I've really now got to the point of asking a difficult question. I set up an icecast server back in early 1999, and it seemed to work fine for months. We had a server crash here that meant I had to go and reget the sources to rebuild, and ever since then it has been nothing but

...I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise. Never more than 15 web servers for most sites. But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the client.I actually like to install Apache and PHP from source and by hand. Although I know that's considered sacrilege in some shops. I do this because on RH flavored systems like CentOS the versions of Apache, php and most other software are a little behind the curve in terms of versions. And that's intentionally so! Because the versions that usually go into the various repos are tested and vetted thoroughl...

...was wondering if it has been considered that the new repo could simply just be called llvm/llvm? This would be a nice and short name which is not taken, and then llvm/llvm-project could be archived, and people would only have to change their git remote once. I hope such a suggestion is not seen as sacrilege - my understanding of the llvm-history is hazy at best, but AFAICT the "-project" suffix is not necessary anymore, now that all the subprojects have been absorbed in the monorepo for a while. >> >> Best regards >> H. >> >> >> >> >>...

...lated to some particular initrd / lvm / whatever setup. I believe I''ve seen it first with 2.6.36-rc8, and now wih 2.6.36 mainline kernel. Haven''t tried 2.6.35, because systemd seem to rely on newer kernel features. Uname -a (I use same kernel for physical machine and vm): Linux sacrilege 2.6.36-fg.roam #9 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 27 14:22:03 YEKST 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Keywords: btrfs, systemd, init, boot, fsck, mount, oops, hang, loop, 2.6.36 Oops message (both links lead to the same data): http://fraggod.net/share/systemd_btrfs_oops/oops.txt http://paste.pocoo.org/raw/290857/...

I'm a little confused about some of these terms. What is: .imap/.imap/ (other than directories) mbox INBOX (I think I have this one) maildir ??????? I'm not sure how all of these things work together. Thanks, Andy

Hi, I just got finished installing Asterisk to a Windows 2003 server. While I might be weak with that part, I am totally at odds in finding a Windows Client to mount on the other machines. Any ideas?